post #1171 of 1200
12/6/08 at 9:17pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
| The bottom line is that no studio thought to hold onto this stuff because they never had an idea that people would one day want to see it. Just think of all the silent films that were tossed because of this reason. Just think at how many outtakes/deleted scenes are missing from thousands of "classic" movies. No uncut BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN, no uncut FRANK MEETS WOLF MAN, no uncut version of countless pre-codes. No spider pit sequence to KING KONG. The list goes on and on. |
|
Originally Posted by MattFini
Poor Friday 5 ... it can't seem to catch a break but it's one of my favorites in the series.
|
|
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
it's aged better nowadays because at least it still feels like a vintage F13 film ... something JASON GOES TO HELL and JASON X don't.
|
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
Not to be a jerk but why is Part V one of your faves?
|
|
Originally Posted by MattFini
And just for fun, my ranking of the Paramount era would go something like this:
Jason Lives The Final Chapter Part 2 A New Beginning Part 1 3-D Jason Takes Manhattan The New Blood |
| But yet there were other "objectionable" scenes from KING KONG which were censored, but saved and then later re-incorporated into the film as we know it today - Kong fondling Fay Wray, Kong chewing on natives and stomping them into the ground... and the sme thing goes for the footage of the little girl being drowned in FRANKENSTEIN, which was edited for decades and then later found -- |
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
I don't hate the New Line ones as much as some fans (I'd rate Freddy Vs. Jason higher than Jason Takes Manhattan and Jason Goes To Hell above A New Beginning but Jason X is just lousy) but the Paramount movie are the ones that will always have a special nostalgic place in my heart. Even the crummy ones.
|
|
Originally Posted by MattFini
Jason X was a lot more fun at first. I think some of the humor that was shoehorned in there is pretty unfortunate, but there are some terrific bits.
|
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
None of these things were cut out of the films. All of this footage was shown when millions of people saw the films when they were originally released. These scenes were cut out of re-releases that happened after the Hayes Office took control and demanded the cuts. The same with March's DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE. In these cases everyone saw them uncut when they were released but future showings were cut. The F13 films have never been seen uncut outside the first one. KING KONG's issues were being in the hands of RKO who was notorious for not keeping anything and throwing away everything they could (just read the history of Welles at the studio).
|
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
I remember when I first heard about Jason X, I thought it sounded terrible but when I saw it, I liked it OK. They took a different approach to a familiar character and story, it had some funny gags and a couple good kills (like the liquid nitrogen head smash and a fun redo of the sleeping bag kill from The New Blood). Unfortunately, every time I've watched it since then, I've disliked it more each time.
|
|
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
I don't know if we can confirm that each and every cut sequence was in the films when they were originally released... maybe a couple of them never made it to the premiere, I don't know for sure. But that doesn't matter, really; the studios still didn't go ahead and throw out the footage once the edits were required for future showings.
|
| All I'm saying is that I don't think we can know for absolutely certain that all the gore sequences from the F13 sequels are long gone. I still think that filmmakers were more savvy by that time about the interest in alternate footage. |
| In the case of a few missing frames here or there with rough quality that won't match the rest of the film, I would think some of the gore cuts would be so quick that they could be restored (if they were available in ANY form) and it wouldn't bother or distract fans. Kane Hodder showed clips from Parts 7 and 8 at a convention I went to, and they were rough with the meter counters and so on ... |
| Fangoria could have had an issue of "what you won't see in F13 2" when the movie was released. There wasn't any call for this from what I've seen. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
Can you name a release from this period that had it? I mean, in 1980 did Cunningham say let's hold onto this footage so that they can release it on the VHS? I personally can't think of too many videos that were sold as being "uncut". |
|
Originally Posted by JeffMc
I have no idea if all the Ft13th censored footage still exists, but it's not that hard to believe that somewhere in Paramount's vaults actual prints of one of the original cuts of the various films still exist. How many prints did Paramount create to show the MPAA during the ratings process? One? Two? Five? Did they cut the same print down each time for resubmission? Were some prints not used at all? No one knows any of this. It's all just conjecture. To keep fighting and debating about it is pointless. Right now, the uncut footage is simply "not available" for public consumption.
|
|
Originally Posted by JeffMc
Yes, it wasn't the norm back then to release 'unrated" videos, but that doesn't mean the studios just threw away all extraneous footage, alternate scenes, or alternate cuts of a film once it hits theaters. It was a couple of years later, but VIDEODROME is one example where the film was trimmed to get an R rating in theaters and then the video release included the uncut unrated version. In fact, VIDEODROME even showed up on cable tv (A&E) many years later in an exclusive tv-version with lots of exclusive footage and alternate scenes never seen before - almost a completely different film made from scraps. HALLOWEEN 2 also showed up in a severely altered tv-version with a completely different alternate ending from the theatrical. That was also years after the original simply edited "tv-version" of the film. Where did that come from?
I have no idea if all the Ft13th censored footage still exists, but it's not that hard to believe that somewhere in Paramount's vaults actual prints of one of the original cuts of the various films still exist. How many prints did Paramount create to show the MPAA during the ratings process? One? Two? Five? Did they cut the same print down each time for resubmission? Were some prints not used at all? No one knows any of this. It's all just conjecture. To keep fighting and debating about it is pointless. Right now, the uncut footage is simply "not available" for public consumption. |
|
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
You've named two out of the hundreds of horror films that were cut down. That pretty much proves my point. Let's go even further back to 1889. How many movies have survived being cut and restored at a later date? Very few and most of them (like METROPOLIS) are found outside this country.
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuck West
Wal-Mart's website is indicating that the "Deluxe Edition" DVDs of parts 4, 5, 6 as well as the Blu-Ray releases of parts 2 and 3 are coming on June 9th.
Search results for friday 13th - Wal-mart |
|
Originally Posted by Simon Caleb
Did you notice Part's 5 & 6 are, so far, listed as not rated...
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuck West
I did, but it's Wal-Mart's listing, so I won't give it too much credibility until the official details arrive (hopefully soon).
|