Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › DVD › Official HTF DVD Reviews › HTF Review: The Howling Special Edition (Recommended)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HTF Review: The Howling Special Edition (Recommended)

post #1 of 31
Thread Starter 





The Howling: Special Edition





Studio: MGM Year: 1981 Rated: R Film Length: 91 minutes Aspect Ratio: 16X9 Enhanced Widescreen (1.85:1), Full Frame (4:3) Subtitles: English, French & Spanish Audio: Dolby Digital 5.1, Mono





Greetings all! I want to begin by telling you how grateful I am to have been given this opportunity on this great forum, and I truly look forward to interacting with all of you! Hopefully, at the very least, you will find all of my reviews informative and useful! There is a lost of product out there these days, so I will attempt to make my reviews as complete as possible to help you make purchase or rental decisions. Of course, I welcome feedback, as long as it is tastefully presented, as it will help me to incorporate things that you want to see in my reviews. Anyway, enough ranting, and on to my first review...



1981 was a watershed year for the modern werewolf movie, with the release of three well received lycanthrope films, An American Werewolf in London, Wolfen, and The Howling For me though, The Howling, director Joe Dante’s B-movie horror classic, stands above the others as the werewolf movie of the 1980s. I do have some minor quibbles with the film’s pacing, but the mix of tongue-in-cheek humor, groundbreaking effects and makeup work by Rob Bottin, and effectively frightening horror elements all add up to a genuinely satisfying movie experience. Largely for these reasons, the film was honored with the 1981 Saturn Award for Best Horror Film by the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films. Moreover, it has influenced countless horror films since, and spawned six sequels, albeit mostly horrible ones. Without further adieu, let’s take a closer look at this Special Edition release of The Howling.



At the outset of the movie, a serial murderer, Eddie Quist (Robert Picardo) is stalking television reporter Karen White (Dee Wallace Stone). In order to help the police apprehend Quist, Karen agrees to be wired and bait him into an ambush. When the wire fails during the set-up, things almost turn out badly for Karen, but fortunately, several police officers are able to follow her anyway, and gun down Quist before he can add her to his list of victims.



This experience severely traumatizes Karen, rendering her unable to function as a reporter, so she seeks help from a renowned psychologist, Dr. George Waggner (Patrick Macnee). Upon meeting her, Dr. Waggner convinces Karen and her spouse Bill (Christopher Stone) that it would be beneficial for her to visit his retreat, The Colony, so she can recuperate. Ironically, shortly after reaching The Colony to confront her inner demons, Karen becomes perturbed by the odd nature of the rest of the guests, and the guttural, demonic sounds emanating from the nearby woods.



In the meantime, a couple of White’s colleagues, doing some snooping of their own, journey to her assailant’s residence and find some rather bizarre items inside. To decipher these clues, they travel to a bookstore that deals in the occult. The owner tells the pair that their discoveries are related to werewolves, and informs them that most of the myths associated with werewolves are just that – myths. For example, werewolves are called shape-shifters because they can change forms at will, not only when the moon is full. They can also regenerate when injured, and unless killed correctly, they will rise from the dead. Apparently, however, silver bullets are the real deal, and can indeed fell werewolves. Coincidentally, he just happens to have a case of silver bullets lying around, but then again, who doesn’t? :wink:



The film continues drawing the two storylines together, and it turns out that The Colony is sort of a commune for werewolves, where they have organized to help ensure their own survival. The most interesting plot points and horrific scenes are unveiled during the final 30 minutes of the film, with the mortals struggling to stay alive, and the residents of The Colony battling each others’ philosophies about their place in the world. For those who haven’t seen the film, I really don’t want to spoil any more of the story, so I will leave it up to you to find out how these events play out for yourselves.



As I inferred in the previous paragraph, the final third of the film is where the meat of this story lies. This brings up my only real complaint about The Howling. The pace of the movie is never laborious, but it takes some time to really get moving, and in my opinion, the general lack of action hinders the first hour of the film somewhat. I found this especially true when comparing the first hour with the almost breakneck pace of the latter portions of the movie. Perhaps Dante was trying to build up anticipation for the seriously cool transformation scenes, but I think a little more excitement during the first hour would have been welcome.



Pacing issues notwithstanding, this is a pretty good flick, which succeeds on many levels by not taking itself too seriously. The performances are little better than average, but that is forgivable, as this is clearly supposed to be a B-movie. More importantly, there is a subtle balance between wit and horror that never gets out of control, and the ending is well constructed. Finally, the skillful make-up and effects were carried out with such precision that they remain effective despite the passage of over twenty years. Joe Dante’s The Howling is not quite perfect, but it remains more fun and entertaining to watch than many of today’s creature features, which makes it easy to recommend it.









So, How Does It Look?
The film is presented two ways, in anamorphic widescreen (1.85:1), and in full-frame (4:3). Cheers to MGM for giving those who are still, for whatever reason, watching films in full-frame a choice. Obviously, after making that statement, I viewed the anamorphic widescreen presentation of the film for this review, and given the age/budget of this film I was impressed. I do not own the previous movie-only version, so I could not do an A/B comparison of the two discs. I have seen it though, so if memory serves this transfer is a slight improvement over the previous one.



To be more specific, although the source material shows its age a bit, flesh-tones are spot-on, and colors are bold and vivid, giving greater impact to the visceral images in the late stages of the film. Blacks are also deep and rich, giving the film a nice texture and good shadow detail, which is important because many scenes occur at night. Thankfully, it seems that compression was kept to a minimum. As such, fine detail extends well into the background, and I did not see any noticeable artifacting. I must say that I am surprised MGM was able to pull off a transfer this good with two versions of the movie and a commentary track on one side of the disc. A very respectable transfer overall, especially considering the age of the source material.






What Is That Noise?
The audio in this Special Edition of The Howling has been given a full-blown Dolby Digital 5.1 re-mix, although the original mono soundtrack is included for those who want to experience the sound as it was originally. I should point out that I am a big advocate of surround mixes, so I chose to listen to the Dolby Digital mix. Again, considering the age of the source material, I thought the 5.1 mix sounded very good, but LFE extension is a somewhat disappointing and the high frequencies seemed a little muddy.



Surround effects were also used somewhat sparingly, but I thought it actually heightened the tension of the film because they were aggressive during the right moments. The really good news is that the sound field of this new mix is expansive, dialogue is crisp and clear, and there seems to be a good balance between the soundtrack, effects, and dialogue within the mix.






Extras, Extras!!!



Please note that most of the extras (except the commentary track) are on side two of this flipper disc. Also, although it is debatable that these classify as extras, this DVD comes with an attractive, textured cardboard slipcover and a four page leaflet that contains some interesting trivia along with the standard chapter selection list.



** Unleashing the Beast: Making The Howling documentary:
Without a doubt, this is the most interesting new addition to The Howling, in terms of added-value material. This is a wonderful documentary, sliced up into five sections, that runs for approximately 45-minutes. Most of the major cast members have participated in this well produced supplement, including Dee Wallace-Stone, Dick Miller, and Robert Picardo. There are also interviews with some of the production team, including Joe Dante, John Sayles, and Mike Finnell.



Throughout the five segments, these individuals cover the journey of this project to the big screen, including how Dante was brought on board and the story was changed to depart from the original novel. There is also exhaustive coverage of the creative processes that went into creating the creatures and morphing effects. To put it bluntly, if there is something you want to know about The Howling, it is in this documentary. In all respects, this is a thoughtful, interesting, and creative documentary, so make sure and watch it!!!



**Making A Monster Movie: Inside The Howling featurette:
It is easy to see that this 8-minute promotional piece was filmed in 1981. The music is horribly dated, and there is little reason to watch this except for nostalgia, now that the far superior Unleashing the Beast has been included on the disc. You may wish to watch the first two minutes for a look at circa-1981 Rob Bottin though. I think he could have passed as a lycanthrope in this movie without any makeup!




**Audio Commentary:
Originally recorded for the laserdisc release, the feature-length commentary, in stereo, re-unites Director Joe Dante and stars Dee Wallace Stone, Christopher Stone, and Robert Picardo. This commentary differs from many of the others I have listened to, in that the participants really seem to have had a good time doing it. Dante does the majority of the talking, but the others join in frequently, poking fun at the fashions of the time, telling stories about people in the film, and relaying the experiences they had on-set.



During the commentary, Dante fires off a lot of interesting information about The Howling. Serious fans will probably already know most of this information, but I was fascinated to learn how the budget was kept to a mere $1.1 million. For example, Wallace-Stone wore her own clothes, and news coverage of dead bodies early in the film was not filmed by Dante, but was actual coroner’s footage. Dante also provides a lot of detail about the people in the film, and alerts viewers to the fact that most of the characters in The Howling are named after the directors of famous horror films.



For budding directors, producers, or just people interested in the art of filmmaking, Dante goes into a lot of depth about various cinematic techniques employed on the film. Among them include, the piecing together of important scenes, getting actors to visualize and respond to creatures that are not really on-set, and the thought process behind trimming scenes and dialogue from the movie.



That is the good, so let’s move on to the very few not-so-well done aspects of the commentary. Really, other than some haphazard editing, there is not a lot wrong with this commentary track. At certain points, there are large breaks between comments, and there were a couple instances where someone would make an inquiry that was never answered. One thing is for sure, there certainly are a lot worse commentaries out there. Overall, this one is a fun listen, and can easily be recommended to fans of the film. However, if commentaries are not your cup of tea, do not worry, because much of this information is also present in the new documentary “Unleashing the Beast”.



**Deleted Scenes:
There are many scene extensions/edited scenes here, and they play continuously in non-anamorphic widescreen. Most of them were wisely cut from the film, at least as far as I am concerned, but here are some of the highlights:
-- Additional footage of the barbeque on the beach
-- A group therapy session at The colony
-- A conversation between Karen and Dr. Waggner
-- A scene with Karen outdoors in a hot tub, which included an effective “cheap scare”, but was overly long.



**Outtakes:
Nothing terribly interesting in this set of outtakes. Just the standard 5 minutes of line flubs and other similar antics. There are some interesting shots of burning stuntmen jumping out of the window of a barn though.



**Photo Gallery:
Two sets of promotional and production photos have been included, and most of the photographs are in color.



**Theatrical Trailers:
Two original theatrical trailers for the film are featured (in widescreen).



The Score Card
Movie: 4/5
Video: 4/5
Audio: 3/5
Extras: 4/5
Overall: 4/5



The Last Word
The Howling has enough going for it to make it my favorite werewolf film of the last twenty years. It is a great mix of genuine frights, dark humor, respectable (if not memorable) performances, and stellar FX work. It is easy for me to recommend the purchase of this Special Edition release, even if you own the original DVD, as MGM has really done it right this time. The transfer is film-like, and largely free from digital distractions. Better still, to my ears the new Dolby Digital 5.1 re-mix is a vast improvement over the sound on the previous movie-only release, and the great supplements should satisfy fans of the film. Go pick it up, turn the lights down, and enjoy!!!



Stay tuned…





Release Date:
August 26th, 2003
post #2 of 31
Well done Jason!

I've been looking forward to this DVD for a while now. Your review has gotten me all excited again.

post #3 of 31
This "Joe Dante's Living Room" commentary is probably one of my favorite commentaries in terms of entertainment value. The actors, especially Picardo, are frequently very funny, and Dante is Scorsese-like in his ability to work up into a frenzy of densely packed information about the making of his film when he gets going.

Regards,
post #4 of 31
I am probably one of the few who have NEVER seen this movie, but your review was excellent This is definitely on my list of 'must-haves' now.

Thanks!
post #5 of 31
A terrific first review! Jason, if you get a review copy, I'd ask you to please write up Raw Meat the first chance you get. It's a real little gem.
post #6 of 31
Exemplary DVD review, Jason. Thorough, insightful and fun.

Thanks for mentioning the slipcase - I wasn't aware that it would have one, as The Fog didn't. Cheers.

Are you going to be reviewing all the other Midnite Movies? I gotsta see some reviews of the Corman DVDs soon!

And Raw Meat is a gem - Pleasance's finest role? It's a superb performance. But I wish that the there was a reversable "Death Line" cover, as I prefer that title.

Anyway, thanks for the review!


Gordy
post #7 of 31
Thread Starter 
Hello everyone! Thanks for all of the positive comments so far, I really appreciate them...

Gordon,

Hopefully, I will be able to get my hands on some of the Midnite Movie discs so I can fill you in on what to expect. Unfortunately, all the Roger Corman films I have requested so far are unavailable as screeners.

I will keep looking into it...

Regards,

Jason
post #8 of 31
Very nice review! It's interesting that MGM chose to put both widescreen and full-frame on the same side, with most of their current releases it seems they are putting full-frame on one side(single layer) bare bones and widescreen on the other side (dual-layer) with extras. I'm glad to hear the video quality doesn't suffer in The Howling though! I'll be picking this one up, thanks for the review!
post #9 of 31
Why pat MGM on the back for offering a full frame version? Would you also celebrate if MGM offered colorized versions off all their black and white films? Would you clap for censored television versions of their R and PG-13 films? If studios want to offer all these things to consumers that's fine, but I see no reason to praise them for it.
post #10 of 31
Thanks, Jason. I'm sure the Corman DVDs will show up at some point in the next two weeks, but if they don't, I'm sure I'll read about them elsewhere. But it must be annoying if DVDs you really want to review aren't made available to you. As I recall the last batch of Midnite Movie were very much under-reviewed before the street date.


Gordy
post #11 of 31
Great review Jason - very thorough and interesting. Thank you.

Herb.
post #12 of 31
A very well done review, Jason. I'm really looking forward to picking this one up as I haven't watched The Howling in at least a decade. Your thorough review just made the wait all the more agonizing for me.
post #13 of 31
Quote:
Why pat MGM on the back for offering a full frame version?


Because it's a much better option than having dual releases, which can lead to many retailers only stocking the full frame version, making the widescreen version more difficult to acquire. If a studio is going to have to provide full frame releases as per the requests of their biggest customers (certain retail chains), I'd much prefer that they do so on a single release. That said, I think that Jason's "cheers" to MGM may have been sarcastic, but only he could answer to that.

DJ
post #14 of 31
Wow, GREAT review Jason. I hope all your reviews will be this thorough! Good Work!! I'm definitely picking up this DVD.
post #15 of 31
Great Review!!! Werewolves are scary... I must watch this movie again...

post #16 of 31
So this disc is double-sided? No sale, then.

Thanks for the review.
post #17 of 31
Yep, very good review... covers all the bases.

Was the audio only average or slightly better than average? A 3 out of 5 suggests (to me) a ho-hum feeling.

I've not seen this film but always wanted to. May rent this first, but if it's better than AW in London, I might have to open a spot for it.

Great job!
post #18 of 31
I can't be sure, but given comments made by Joe Dante (regarding his preferences when comparing 1.66:1 and 1.85:1 transfers of THE HOWLING) I think that the 'full-screen' version supplied by MGM here may actually be an unmatted transfer, with more picture on the top and bottom. That's what I'm assuming anyway. Folks with access to the disc will be able to easily compare the two. Dante has confirmed that he prefers a widescreen presentation but, from memory, felt that THE HOWLING worked better with a 1.66:1 transfer than with the more extreme 1.85:1 cropping that MGM have used on the new DVD. Dante made some suggestions, but was advised that MGM usually opt for the 1.85:1 matte (when preparing 'widescreen' versions of films that have been shot with a full 1.33:1 negative) as a default.
post #19 of 31
It could actually be closer to 1.78:1 than 1.85:1.


Gordy
post #20 of 31
Thanks Jason for the great review! I've never seen this movie but might just have to give it a spin...

dave
post #21 of 31
like David, never seen the movie so might as well pick it up when comes out

post #22 of 31
This was one of the first movies I bought on DVD a couple of years back. The film is full framed and only in Dolby Digital Mono so I have to use a "virtual" surround mode to get decent sound. I might just have to upgrade this movie to the more recent one, especially if it is in 5.1 and widescreen. The transfer of the film I have now is pretty good. The sound sucks though. Great to know that they are gonna release an improved version of this great werewolf film.
post #23 of 31
Nice review. Guess I'll have to put this on my wanted list, too. It'll have to go some to beat An American Werewolf in London, though

Jack
post #24 of 31
Excellent review Jason,The Howling is one of my favorite werewolf films, although I would put American Werewolf in London ahead of Howling as best lycanthrope movie, and I also have a soft spot for Lon Chaney Jr as Lawrence Talbot, the most famous werewolf of them all.

I'll definitely be buying this, and watching it when the moon is full and bright.
post #25 of 31
jason -

a great review. informative and well laid out.



btw - the font is a touch big for my tastes, but that's a very minor (and silly) quibble.

[edit] oh yeah...does your "recommended" equate to the oft-seen "highly recommended"? or are you using some other sort of recommendation scale?
post #26 of 31
Jason Perez wrote (post #1):

Quote:
1981 was a watershed year for the modern werewolf movie, with the release of three well received lycanthrope films, An American Werewolf in London, Wolfen, and The Howling For me though, The Howling, director Joe Dante's B-movie horror classic, stands above the others as the werewolf movie of the 1980s. I do have some minor quibbles with the film’s pacing, but the mix of tongue-in-cheek humor, groundbreaking effects and makeup work by Rob Bottin, and effectively frightening horror elements all add up to a genuinely satisfying movie experience.
. . . . .
The Howling has enough going for it to make it my favorite werewolf film of the last twenty years. It is a great mix of genuine frights, dark humor, respectable (if not memorable) performances, and stellar FX work.

One quibble. Wolfen is not a "lycanthrope film". It is a pro-environmental story involving a super-intelligent wolf-species. What you might have said here, instead, is that The Howling (1981) was the first of a triad of "transformation" films---call them "lycanthrope films", if you like---that pushed forward the art and techniques of film make-up effects at the time. The second was, of course, John Landis's American Werewolf (1981). But the third was not Wolfen---no one is transformed there---, but 1982's obscure and little successful Philippe Mora film, The Beast Within (already made available on disc from MGM Home Video), which was far more like a traditional "werewolf film" than the either of the other two. (Only
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
insects are substituted for wolves.)


Tom Burman did the effects for the latter.

I agree completely, however, about the transformation effects in The Howling. I like them so much better than Rick Baker's stuff (done on a significantly higher budget, no doubt). And the end result is a lot "scarier" as well. The good part about them is that they made the transformation look the way any radical disruption in body systems is likely to be: extremely painful and traumatic. And, of course, the work here is just a "warm-up" for the masterful effects of John Carpenter's The Thing (1982).

The only major problem I've ever seen with this film is that it is too self-consciously aware of the tradition: there are too many "inside" references to previous films in the sub-genre, and the tongue-in-cheekiness is sometimes too outrageously inconsonant with the gory horror. But the whole is greater than the sum of the parts, and it ends up as one of the best "werewolf pictures" ever. (Not that there's much by way of strong competition.)
post #27 of 31
Thread Starter 
Ted (and everyone else), thanks for your feedback! I will consider your suggestion, as the font does make for a lot of extra scrolling !! Keep the comments coming, as that is the only way my reviews will serve you best...
post #28 of 31
Thread Starter 
Rex, point well taken! I have not seen Wolfen in a long time, and it slipped my mind, but you are indeed correct when you say it is not a lycanthrope film. It has also been a long time since I heard anyone mention the Beast Within. My grandmother took me to see that when it came out (I was 8 years old), and it creeped me out! I think I had nightmares for about a month. Thanks for bringing back the memories....
post #29 of 31
Thread Starter 
Hello all!

I was thinking about what Ted Lee said (post #25), and I believe there should be some kind of standard established, so from now on I will use the following:

Title only (Rent It, Purchase at a Discount, or Pass)
Recommended (Worth a Purchase)
Highly Recommended (A No-Brainer!)

I hope this helps, but I will let you know up front that you might not see "Highly Recommended" from me too often.

Regards,

Jason
post #30 of 31
Quote:
So this disc is double-sided? No sale, then.

Why no sale? Because you actually have to get up to flip the disc, or because you are worried about scratches? I, for one, have no issues with double sided discs and consider the double sided MGM SEs among some of the finest discs in my collection.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Official HTF DVD Reviews
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › DVD › Official HTF DVD Reviews › HTF Review: The Howling Special Edition (Recommended)