Re: IT's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World Restoratiion
Hi Robert and all IMMMW fans. After having seen the cut and restored versions several times I believe the LD restoration is quite the better movie. Restored are a considerable amount of scenes featuring byplay and character moments between major and minor characters, all of which give variety of tone and incident to the movie. Many players get to show a bit more of their repertoire. Most importantly, these additions show the know-how of the director, who recognized the value of all this to his first cut, and the screenwriters, who, reportedly, planned pause moments to fit in between the big slapstick gags. So, when they finally come, they are all the more effective. A bit like the relationship between the highs and lows you experience on a rollercoaster. (Useful comparison: long and short versions of 1941). But it´s really Comedy 101.
The restoration does not contain stills. Some sequences are alternate takes (look for squeeze effect left and right in the image). One or two continuity errors occur.
I sincerely believe IAMMMW deserves as full a restoration as possible. The LD and DVD look good. Change the main title color background back to the original one, restore all other available A/V incl. police calls, add necessary stills, audio-only segments and/or subtitles for lost audio (all to clarify lost segments) plus the LD docu, scans of the full screenplay and a Robert A. Harris (+ cast members) commentary and you´ll have a fine DVD-based restoration/documentation. I´ll buy it. Branching could be used for the stills sequences. A Robert A. Harris-quality 65mm film restoration is a different matter.
I believe the film is a quite vicious satire on greed with a lot of silent movie-style slapstick along with satirical caricatures of people and trends of the day. This openly satirical bent is quite possibly the reason many people dislike the film, especially if you´ve read the usual stuff about "gargantuan silent comedy homage" beforehand and then being disappointed because the movie is not an uncomplicated farce. But Kramer was a director of socially conscious, issue-driven melodramas, so a satire on greed fits in.
Can any IAMMW fan tell me where the scenes with Howard Da Silva, silent star Minta Durfee and Phil Arnold (who´s he?) would have fit in the movie? My guess is Phil Arnold played Barrie Chase´s husband (Dick Shawn steals his car to save mama?). If i remember correctly the Phil Arnold scene was found by the Save IAMMMW campaigners in the late 90s. Ms. Chase was once listed as playing one Mrs. Haliburton but that´s changed on the ImdB listing. Makes sense in a satire that beachboy Dick Shawn would be frugging with a married woman!
S Andersson
SWEDEN