|
|
 |
02-06-2006, 08:35 PM
|
#1 of 17
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 157
|
SVS B2 or B4
I am slowly replacing my gear and while I want the SVS for the performance factor, I wanted to know if anyone who owns it thinks it is feasible to cut a hole in my wall and put a grill over it to kind of hide it. I am adding on a garage to the room that I am using as a home theater and the back side of sub would stick out into the new garage.
Oh, and do they make the b4 anymore or just the b2 ultra?
Jay Foster
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:59 PM
|
#2 of 17
|
|
Member
Location: Charlotte, NC
Join Date: Dec 2003
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,556
|
The B4 is out of production right now due to the closing of a supplier. However, word has it that they're planning a replacement.
I don't think your plan will work though. Doing so would have the ports pointing out of the room which would hurt performance. Based on what you're looking for, I think you should consider an infinite baffle setup.
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 12:47 AM
|
#3 of 17
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 04:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,191
|
If you got an adjacent garage you want to build out into anyways forget about a commercial sub. Infinite baffle.
http://home.comcast.net/~klone-audio...-12Shiva1.html
There was a great forum dedicated to these, but it seems to be down right now. The above link will get the idea across though. For the cost of a B4 you could buy a ridiculous amount of these (and therefore even more output capability):
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=295-455
and a good quality pro amp. Do some searching in the DIY area for infinite baffle or IB subs. You'll get lots off good info on this and discover that no one who has built one regrets it and almost no one has willingly gone back to a regular sub after having one.
Also as the poster above noted, the design of any of the SVS box subs pretty much makes in wall placement impossible. I also wouldn't recommend it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
02-07-2006, 10:13 AM
|
#4 of 17
|
|
Parker Clack
Owner
Location: KC MO
Join Date: Jul 1997
Local Time: 04:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 38,815
|
Jay:
I am with Dustin on this one. If I had you situation I would build an IB.
Here is a link to the IB fact page that Dustin was referring to.
Faq Page
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 10:53 AM
|
#5 of 17
|
|
SVS Customer Service
Location: Jersey, USA
Join Date: Mar 1999
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,238
|
Yeah. If you're willing to cut a hole in the wall anyway (that's usually what stops people), might as well IB. At least four good 15's if you want try for B4 output/headroom.
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 11:41 AM
|
#6 of 17
|
|
Member
Location: Southaven, MS
Join Date: Aug 2000
Local Time: 04:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,606
|
Quote:
|
There was a great forum dedicated to these, but it seems to be down right now.
|
It's alive and well but at a different home. Infinitely Baffled
-Robert
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 05:38 PM
|
#7 of 17
|
|
Join Date: Jul 1999
Local Time: 10:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,320
|
"At least four good 15's if you want to try for B4 output/headroom."
And why not 4 good 12's with an IB instead of the 4 12's in the comparatively small box of the B4?
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 10:01 PM
|
#8 of 17
|
|
SVS Customer Service
Location: Jersey, USA
Join Date: Mar 1999
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,238
|
Quote:
|
And why not 4 good 12's with an IB instead of the 4 12's in the comparatively small box of the B4?
|
Because the SVS is bass reflex and can rely on the vents/resonators for output in the deep bass, while IB relies completely on the displacement of the drivers...like any sealed sub. In reflex, excursion actually decreases as you approach tuning...with sealed it just keeps increasing with decreasing frequency. So, as you see, there's lots more displacement required in sealed/IB to reach a given SPL. My estimate might even be conservative knowing the B4.
http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volum...ayporting.html
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 02:20 PM
|
#9 of 17
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 157
|
I appreciate all of your responses. I am looking into trying this idea of building a sub as suggested.
Jay Foster
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 05:12 PM
|
#10 of 17
|
|
Join Date: Jul 1999
Local Time: 10:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,320
|
Thanks Jack
I would have thought that an IB would behave just the opposite of a sealed enclosure given the infinite space behind the drivers.
The reinforcement of a ported design I can appreciate, however, the sealed box idea seems counterintuitive.
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 07:17 PM
|
#11 of 17
|
|
SVS Customer Service
Location: Jersey, USA
Join Date: Mar 1999
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,238
|
Quote:
|
I would have thought that an IB would behave just the opposite of a sealed enclosure given the infinite space behind the drivers.
|
I can't imagine what "the opposite of a sealed enclosure" would imply.
Quote:
|
The reinforcement of a ported design I can appreciate, however, the sealed box idea seems counterintuitive.
|
Not sure what you mean. An IB is a sealed box acoustically the volume of which affords effectively no back pressure on the woofers, allowing them to operate at their maximum deep bass efficiency and minimal rolloff. Unlike a ported design, sealed relies completely on the excursion of the woofers for output, and so needd more displaced volume for a given SPL/frequency.
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 08:14 PM
|
#12 of 17
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,987
|
Hi Jay,
The B4 isn't currently available but it will be introduced as the PB12-plus/4 a little later in 2006(along with our new powered-SS). But as others have mentioned...if you are planning on "cutting holes" you should definitely consider an IB. Just don't skimp on the overall displacement capabilities. Or, design it so that you can easily add more drivers (if needed) down the road..
Tom V.
SVS
|
|
| |