Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Live Search: 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum




 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Entertainment and Media > SD DVD - Film and Documentary
[ Paramount to re-do "Godfather" DVDs ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 12:15 AM   #121 of 289
Robert Crawford
Crawdaddy
Administrator
 
Location: Michigan
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 09:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 18,319

I guess you don't support OAR, huh? I am not counting you as an OAR advocate.

Damin,
Cut it out, stop stoking the fires here.




Crawdaddy



G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
Robert Crawford is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 12:41 AM   #122 of 289
Rain
Rain
Member
 
Location: The Movie Snob from Vancouver, BC, Canada
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 07:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,511

I can't accurately comment on the existing DVDs, as I have not watched them since obtaining my RPTV and have only viewed them on a rather shoddy TV.

But I'm always game for a re-dip if there is a significant improvement to the presentations.




"Imagine all the people, living life in peace..." - Imagine by John Lennon
Rain is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 12:55 AM   #123 of 289
Britton
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Local Time: 09:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 848

Whew, I'm glad there's SOMEONE out there who wants to talk Godfather too.
Britton is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 01:51 AM   #124 of 289
Kwang Suh
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Local Time: 07:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,118

Ahem...

Anyhow, looking forward to these.
Kwang Suh is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 06:10 AM   #125 of 289
Gordon McMurphy
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Local Time: 02:14 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 3,522

I can't believe all these 1.78:1 vs. 1.85:1 arguments. Matting to 1.85:1 is not a golden rule, you know. The framing doesn't have to be cut to the quick. 1.78:1 is a lot safer.

Most DVDs that are stated on the packaging to be 1.85:1 are in fact, 1.78:1, just as most 2.35:1 transfers are 2.40:1.


Gordy
Gordon McMurphy is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 08:36 AM   #126 of 289
John Alderson
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Local Time: 10:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 515

Any word yet on when the new editions will be coming out? I will be curious to see A/B comparison screenshots when they do. I don't think there's anything that would get me to double dip, but it'll be interesting.
John Alderson is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 08:44 AM   #127 of 289
Dave H
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Local Time: 09:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,060

John, according to the article, late next year they will be released.
Dave H is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 01:01 PM   #128 of 289
Dan Hitchman
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 07:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,493

If they are a significant improvement then I will purchase this new release. Thank goodness I didn't buy the first release as there was a large group of disappointed viewers.

Dan
Dan Hitchman is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 02:37 PM   #129 of 289
Victoria K.
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Local Time: 11:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 15

So does anyone know about the soundmix issue? Will the original mono mix be included this time around?
Victoria K. is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 02:59 PM   #130 of 289
Robert Crawford
Crawdaddy
Administrator
 
Location: Michigan
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 09:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 18,319

Thank goodness I didn't buy the first release as there was a large group of disappointed viewers.

Who's to say you would've been one of them? There are several here that are very happy with the first release dvd presentation.



G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
Robert Crawford is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 03:19 PM   #131 of 289
Ed St. Clair
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 06:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,194

Quote:
I can't believe all these 1.78:1 vs. 1.85:1 arguments. Matting to 1.85:1 is not a golden rule, you know. The framing doesn't have to be cut to the quick. 1.78:1 is a lot safer.

Gordy,
Once again, does this transfer 'technique', allow the DVD too be OAR?
Still thinking, an OAR DVD has to be the same as the film!
Am I wrong?



Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
Ed St. Clair is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-14-2003, 03:26 PM   #132 of 289
Ed St. Clair
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 06:14 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,194

Quote:
I sure hope you don't own any 1.33:1 transfers of 1.37:1 films, either.
I don't know.
Would sure like to find out more about this.
Funny thing I thought DVDFILE, had it wrong when they stated; Pumping Iron would be released in it's original 1,37:1 ratio.
I thought it was a misprint, of 1.33:1. :b
Learn something ALL the time, in this hobby!



Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
Ed St. Clair is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif