Peter Kline wrote in post
#18:
Quote:
|
The Cinram deal is for CD manufacturing and distribution only.
|
It's for DVD manufacturing, packaging and distribution as well.
Here's the
press release regarding the acquisition at Cinram's site.
Given that the deal includes Snapper manufacturer Ivy Hill Corporation (this is explicitly mentioned in the above-linked press release), I suspect you are right on target, Bryant, in your post #19 when you said:
Quote:
|
My guess is the new six-year contract with Warner Home Video includes printing and packaging by Ivy Hill — thus ensuring a continued cash flow for this part of the business — but I'm not sure.
|
I have not seen reference to this six-year contract in my reading on this. But unless this contract stipulates use of the Snapper and that contract was an unlikely explicit component of the deal, senior management at Cinram could decide to do something differently in the future (just as New Line senior management obviously decided to break with the Snapper despite their corporate parentage). It's all speculative

at this point.
But at this juncture, that
Reloaded Keepcase should probably best be looked at as exactly that: a fluke, not an oracle

. IMO, there's nothing inherent to this deal that
ipso facto spells the demise of the Snapper.
Paul