|
|
 |
12-24-2006, 12:53 AM
|
#2 of 10
|
|
Alon Goldberg
Member
Location: Vancouver, BC
Join Date: Jul 2006
Local Time: 04:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,082
|
Re: $200ish receiver
For receivers I would probably lean towards the Yamaha RX-V459, available for $250. Sony receivers aren't well received for home theatre (their ES models being the exception to the rule).
For speakers, you can get far more value than the Bose Acoustimass 16 ($1,169 list). For instance:
Speakers: Hsu Ventriloquist VT-12, $200
Subwoofer: Hsu STF-2, $400
The Hsu speakers will put the Bose speakers to shame, at half the price.
|
|
|
12-24-2006, 09:42 PM
|
#3 of 10
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Local Time: 12:20 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 2,557
|
Re: $200ish receiver
In the $200 range the Denon AVR786S, Onkyo SR603 or SR504 from eCost would all be good choices. In the $300 range you could get a Pioneer 1015TX. If you need HDMI in that price range then look at the Panasonic XR57S or even the Sherwood RD-7502 would work well for under $300. If you can stretch your budget into the $350 range then the Pioneer 1016TX would give you a lot of power, HDMI passthrough switching, and THX Select2 certification/processing. Honestly these are all good options and I doubt any of them would disappoint, the decision should really be made based on what features you need and how much you can stomach to spend.
|
|
|
12-25-2006, 03:09 PM
|
#4 of 10
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Local Time: 07:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 45
|
Re: $200ish receiver
As an owner of the HSU Ventiloquist I agree with Alon Goldberg 110%. Even with the STF-1 sub they would put the Bose to absolute shame. You can get both as a package for only $500.
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 11:06 AM
|
#5 of 10
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Local Time: 07:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 250
|
Re: $200ish receiver
brendy,
I take it you like the Hsu Ventriloquist system. How large of a room do you have it in?
How large of a room do you think it would be able to perform well in? My father needs a system but he is cheap. I am also looking at the SVS SBS-01 system for him.
We are talking 30 foot cielings in a room that is about 1,200 square feet when all told.
My budget system constrained by WAF
JVC HD-ILA HD-52G787
Panasonic DVD-S52K
Marantz SR5600
Marantz CC4300
NHT IW3s all around
PureAV PF60
SVS PB12-NSD/2 <--- The Bone Crusher!
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 11:13 AM
|
#6 of 10
|
|
Alon Goldberg
Member
Location: Vancouver, BC
Join Date: Jul 2006
Local Time: 04:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,082
|
Re: $200ish receiver
No satellite speaker system in the world will be able to fill a 1200 square foot room (especially one that is 36000 cubic feet). These systems are designed for small rooms or condo's. Your dad will be very disappointed with either the HSU or SVS package. What is his budget for speakers, subwoofer and receiver?
|
|
|
 |
 |
12-27-2006, 11:31 AM
|
#7 of 10
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Local Time: 07:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 250
|
Re: $200ish receiver
Alon,
I figured, but he like so many other people hear the ads and amazing claims for such systems and think they will work for him.
The main listening area though is about 20' wide and about 25' deep. The additional sq footage mentioned is the kitchen (connected to the main area) and dining room/hallway also connected. There are some walls to break them up, but not alot.
I would say, if I really pushed him I could get him to $1,000 to $1,200 including a receiver and new DVD player. He is getting a new 42" LCD TV and needs a new DVD player. So maybe a couple bucks more at the best.
Placing the rear right channel is going to be a big challenge because of room layout and getting the wires to it in a clean fashion. So i was thinking that he could start with a 3.1 system and then add the surround down the road if he felt he needed it.
Was looking at speakers from Swan, Paradigm, and a couple others.
Suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Remember, need the receiver, speakers, sub, and DVD player.
Thanks!
My budget system constrained by WAF
JVC HD-ILA HD-52G787
Panasonic DVD-S52K
Marantz SR5600
Marantz CC4300
NHT IW3s all around
PureAV PF60
SVS PB12-NSD/2 <--- The Bone Crusher!
|
|
|
 |
 |
12-27-2006, 02:16 PM
|
#8 of 10
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Local Time: 07:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 250
|
Re: $200ish receiver
Also, what about the Infinity Primus speakers? Can get a good deal on those.
My budget system constrained by WAF
JVC HD-ILA HD-52G787
Panasonic DVD-S52K
Marantz SR5600
Marantz CC4300
NHT IW3s all around
PureAV PF60
SVS PB12-NSD/2 <--- The Bone Crusher!
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 02:55 PM
|
#9 of 10
|
|
Alon Goldberg
Member
Location: Vancouver, BC
Join Date: Jul 2006
Local Time: 04:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,082
|
Re: $200ish receiver
Brian,
While the room is quite large, does the listening area and attending soundfield need to be that large? Can you construct a smaller, more manageable soundfield within the larger physical room?
|
|
|
12-27-2006, 04:07 PM
|
#10 of 10
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Local Time: 07:20 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 250
|
Re: $200ish receiver
Alon,
Honestly, I have no idea what you are talking about. Are you talking about adding partitions, acoustic treatments, or something like that?
If the answer is yes, no, that couldn't be done.
Also, keep in mind, my father could care less about audiophile quality or even something approaching true theater sound.
I am trying to prevent him from purchasing something that will be a total disappointment and just not do a decent job. Trying to get him to step up a little to something that will perform at an "acceptable" level.
He also would not be listening to movies, TV, or music at anything approaching "loud" or at a level where the sub will rattle the windows and the such.
My budget system constrained by WAF
JVC HD-ILA HD-52G787
Panasonic DVD-S52K
Marantz SR5600
Marantz CC4300
NHT IW3s all around
PureAV PF60
SVS PB12-NSD/2 <--- The Bone Crusher!
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
| |