|
|
 |
12-06-2003, 11:41 PM
|
#1 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Local Time: 08:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 7
|
Whaddya mean "HDTV **receiver** "? A rec'r is for SOUND only, right?
Here I am ready to order the Yamaha 5660 receiver (basically like the 640) and someone else in this group mentions (in a different topic) that they suggest the more expensive 1400 "for its HDTV capability".
Excuse me? Isn't a receiver for *sound*? Why the mention of how a 1400 is HDTV-ready and a 5660 ISN'T?
Oh man, I had done so much research on what rec'r to buy and now it may have to start again.
Info:
- use: 90% DVD films [the source will probably be a Denon DVD1200 or 1600], the rest TV and CDs.
- display is a front projector: Boxlight 1HD / Sanyo Z1 [NB: this is an "exactly 1/2 HD projector"]
- Speakers will be Axioms [can't wait]
- here in Ontario Starchoice is offering an HD satellite box, so I may get that over the standard box.
THX!
|
|
|
12-06-2003, 11:59 PM
|
#2 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Local Time: 01:07 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 876
|
Well recievers are basically audio and video, most of them anyways.
Home Theater recievers usually do both audio and video. Higher models will have stuff like S-Video and component video. They will also be able to handle things like HDTV signals and progressive scanning and such.
It all depends how much you are willing to spend on the unit though.
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 12:02 AM
|
#3 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 06:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 391
|
They do both, which is why they're called A/V receivers. But the Video part is more of a pass-through. You could run only your audio through the receiver and route the video directly to your TV/Projector etc. and in fact many people do this, especially with receivers that don't pass HiDef through very well.
- Jack
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 12:08 AM
|
#4 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Local Time: 08:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 7
|
"... They will also be able to handle things like HDTV signals and progressive scanning and such.... "
I just want to know what concrete difference there'd be if you put a HD signal into both the 1400 and the 5660, and ouputted this to a HD TV, or to my 1/2 HD Boxlight. Would the 5660 kind of downgrade the signal to a less-than-HD image? like what, 99% of HD's resolution? 50%? See, it'd be nice to see what it actually would look like.
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 12:13 AM
|
#5 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Local Time: 08:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 7
|
Jack said " You could run only your audio through the receiver and route the video directly to your TV/Projector etc. and in fact many people do this, especially with receivers that don't pass HiDef through very well."
Hmm, I suppose then this would negate the HD issue as far as the rec'r is concerned, which is good to know. So if i ever get that Starchoice box, I'll try putting it through either re'cr, and then try doing a straight-to-the-imager setup to see which is better.
Kinda makes me wonder why people use their rec'rs as video pass-throughs in the first place, unless they do other special things. Does it make switching easier? Anything else?
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 12:35 AM
|
#6 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Local Time: 01:07 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 22
|
i actually ordered the 5660 and returned it just for the reason that it had only 30 mhz video switching. i bought the 1400 with dplIIx and it has a ton of more features and a little bit more power.
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 07:09 AM
|
#8 of 12
|
|
Member
Location: Singapore
Join Date: May 2003
Local Time: 09:07 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 1,252
|
Quote:
|
Kinda makes me wonder why people use their rec'rs as video pass-throughs in the first place, unless they do other special things. Does it make switching easier? Anything else?
|
Some people have a game box, VCR, LD, DVD and a cable STB and there may not be enough inputs on the TV to accommodate all the sources. The other consideration is convenience - switching video thru the rcvr allows you to select the source on the rcvr remote and automatically have it on screen instead of having to switch the input source on the TV. 'course in most cases to preserve hi quality video the source goes direct to the TV (DVD or HD signals)
>
DVD-A registry for hirez/surround audio
Bluray, DVD-Audio, DAD/HDAD, DualDisc, MVI
<
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 09:24 AM
|
#9 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Local Time: 08:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 7
|
Chu said
"I think the 1400 has a slightly higher bandwidth (down 3dB@60MHz) while the 5660 is down 3dB@30MHz ... one generally wants a bandwidth for the device to be ~3x the bandwidth of the signal you're pushing through it in order to avoid noticeable degradation. Regular DVD is 6.75 MHz, 480p is 13.5 MHz, while 720p & 1080i both are 36MHz ... Neither can reliably do the highest resolution. For that you'd need something with a 100 MHz or higher bandwidth."
Thank you for this valuable explanation. Your post has made it very clear to me.
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 11:16 AM
|
#10 of 12
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 1999
Local Time: 05:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,622
|
Note: there are some good video switch box's for $80-$180 that take 4 HD video sources (including optical or coaxial digital) and switch them to 1 output. So if you found a great receiver that has everything BUT HD video switching, these external box's let you expand without upgrading to a +$500 model.
|
|
|
12-07-2003, 08:10 PM
|
#11 of 12
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Local Time: 09:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 7,403
|
Now if Bob would just post that link to what I consider a pretty damned good thread 
|
|
|
12-08-2003, 12:11 AM
|
#12 of 12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 06:07 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 391
|
I personally run everyth | |