|
|
 |
12-04-2003, 10:30 AM
|
#1 of 24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Local Time: 05:08 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 374
|
To educate those of us who are still new at this game, would you tell us when you bought something new and it didn't meet your expectations. For example, you went from a low end to a higher end receiver or to separates and didn't notice that much difference or maybe you went to more expensive speakers and didn't notice that much difference. I read threads that say "I went from (insert brand and model here)to something else and WOW what difference!" But surely we don't hit a homerun everytime. What did you go from/to, and were you dissapointed?
|
|
|
12-04-2003, 12:11 PM
|
#2 of 24
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Local Time: 01:08 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 5,468
|
Sort of in reverse...
I bought a Denon 4802, that now seems overkill, I'll bet a Denon 3802/3 would have met my needs, and I could of saved some serious cash.
But, I got headroom to burn well beyond even reference levels, thats for sure.
I must add that the 4802 has exceeded my expectations in every possible way in the two years I have owned it, so more a related post, more than what you were particularly looking for.
|
|
|
 |
 |
12-04-2003, 12:17 PM
|
#3 of 24
|
|
Member
Location: San Jose, Ca.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 06:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 11,228
|
Back in the day, I owned a Sony STR-DE815 receiver. When upgrade time came around, I did a lot of auditioning and found that what I thought was decent, was really below average. I move to Marantz and have been very happy since.
THEN, I was looking for a little system for the bedroom. I found a DE475 receiver very cheap, brand new, and against my own judgement, I bought it. Needless to say, I was completely disappointed again and "pawned" it off on a friend within a few days (he was happy, it was better than no sound). Again I looked to Marantz for the bedroom system, found an open box SR4000 for the same price as the Sony. I was just floored by the difference in power deliver and sound quality overall. Never again will I purchase Sony DE, or recommend them.
"The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so." - Mark Twain
HT: Marantz SR-8300, MA500 monoblocks x 2, 5X GR Research A/V-2s, Adire Audio Tempest sub, Denon 2900, Oppo 980H, Toshiba HD-A2, RC2000MkII remote, Panamax 5100, Panamax Max2 sub, Slim PS2, PS3 60G + 320G USB
Bedroom: Marantz PM-7200 Integrated, GR Research A/V-1s, Sony 222ES SACD, RC3200 remote, Panamax M8EX
Audio: Audioquest * Video: Bluejeans
My DVDs My HT
|
|
|
 |
 |
12-04-2003, 12:46 PM
|
#5 of 24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Local Time: 01:08 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 491
|
i am mildly disappointed with my denon dvd2200. its a great player for the price, but its not what its being touted as online. its still a entry level higher end player. i will at least replace it with a decent cd transport and dac.
other than that, im happy with all my purchases.
|
|
|
12-04-2003, 01:03 PM
|
#6 of 24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Local Time: 01:08 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 17
|
I would like to share my mild disappointment from my Yamaha RXV1300 reciever. Due to some reasons I did not get the bass and depth of sound I expected from Yamaha recievers I owned. I compared it with Marantz and Elite recievers and ended up with Elite. That was the one and only issue I had with my Yamaha recievers. I bought RXV540 first and was happy with it except the bass issue. I wanted to stick with Yamaha due to its flexibilty and features in there price range. So, I upgraded to rxv1300 and felt the same thing. I ended up selling it to my friend and swiched to Elite.
|
|
|
12-04-2003, 02:13 PM
|
#7 of 24
|
|
Member
Location: San Jose, Ca.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 06:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 11,228
|
Quote:
|
i am mildly disappointed with my denon dvd2200
|
I have the Denon 2200 as well, but I bought it for video only, and in that respect, it does quite well. I didn't buy it for it's audio capability, since I already have an SACD player that is definitely better. DVD-A was a bonus, but not a selling point.
"The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so." - Mark Twain
HT: Marantz SR-8300, MA500 monoblocks x 2, 5X GR Research A/V-2s, Adire Audio Tempest sub, Denon 2900, Oppo 980H, Toshiba HD-A2, RC2000MkII remote, Panamax 5100, Panamax Max2 sub, Slim PS2, PS3 60G + 320G USB
Bedroom: Marantz PM-7200 Integrated, GR Research A/V-1s, Sony 222ES SACD, RC3200 remote, Panamax M8EX
Audio: Audioquest * Video: Bluejeans
My DVDs My HT
|
|
|
12-04-2003, 03:04 PM
|
#9 of 24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Local Time: 06:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 544
|
Well - when I first got into HT - I spent $3,000 in Bose tower speakers. The Circuit City guy claimed that it was the best equipment at the best value. Boy was he wrong! Now I have a full set of KLH speakers with $1,000 in Monster Cable that totally wipes it out!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
j/k - I've never been steered the wrong way with this forum or AVS when I first started this hobby. I think it took me 3-6 months before I even made my first purchase because I was so new into this and didn't want to dive into an immediate pitfall. Bottom Line - this place ROCKS! 
|
|
|
 |
 |
12-04-2003, 05:46 PM
|
#10 of 24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Local Time: 08:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 70
|
The only times I was disapointed were when I didn't do my research and got caught up in the excitement of buying a new toy. And back before the Internet, it was a lot harder to get good information and make comparisons.
For example, I bought a Technics Dolby Surround Receiver back when surround sound first came out (before Pro-Logic even). It cost $475 back in '88, and was a very nice receiver, the front channels with 100 watts of power, the back with FIVE watts of power. Couldn't hear a thing in the back channels.
When DVD players first broke the $300 mark, I decided to get one and a new TV. After I got the DVD and TV, I stopped at Circuit City to buy a special $30 video cable since this was my first "high definition" video source. The old tv just had an RF input; didn't even think to check to see if the TV had an S-Video input (it didn't, just composite).
Now I force myself to calm down when I have a few bucks, and thoroughly think my purchases through. (That is until I see some shiny lights, and LEDs flashing, and fancy remote controls......)
|
|
|
 |
 |
12-04-2003, 06:18 PM
|
#11 of 24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Local Time: 09:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 324
|
One thing I noticed, is that for me atleast, it is difficult to remember how my system sounded before I upgraded, and that makes it hard to hear the improvement. But going back to the old equipment and using the new equipment for a while is really easy.
I went over to my friends house who I sold a lot of my old equipment to, like toshiba DVD and JBL speakers and sub. I can really hear how much better my new equipment sounds
\"Part of intelligence is knowing someone elses version of reality is more accurate than yours\"
---
My DVD Collection
|
|
|
|