|
|
 |
07-09-2003, 06:11 PM
|
#2 of 14
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Local Time: 03:47 PM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 128
|
Richard:
I generally agree with the charecterizations you quote from another thread, although I don't find the Onkyos all that neutral. Nevertheless, they are generall true. But you are looking at a Pioneer Elite receiver, which is different from the regular Pioneer line. The Pioneer Elite line has long tried to emulate the sound of tube amplifiers, which are very warm. In that sense, they are very much a different brand from Pioneer.
I would also agree that your Klipsch speakers are on the bright side, so the 45TX should be a good match. I actually think it will help to tame the harshness that you have detected in your speakers. I would also consider the Harman/Kardons for those speakers, but you should audition a receiver in your home if at all possible before you commit to buying.
Good luck.
|
|
|
07-09-2003, 06:16 PM
|
#3 of 14
|
|
Member
Location: San Jose, Ca.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 08:47 AM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 11,228
|
I don't find the Elite line to be bright at all. With my limited auditioning, the 43 and 41 sounded a bit flat, while the 45 and up seemed relatively neutral.
I would consider H/K, Marantz, NAD, Rotel with Klipsch.
"The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so." - Mark Twain
HT: Marantz SR-8300, MA500 monoblocks x 2, 5X GR Research A/V-2s, Adire Audio Tempest sub, Denon 2900, Oppo 980H, Toshiba HD-A2, RC2000MkII remote, Panamax 5100, Panamax Max2 sub, Slim PS2, PS3 60G + 320G USB
Bedroom: Marantz PM-7200 Integrated, GR Research A/V-1s, Sony 222ES SACD, RC3200 remote, Panamax M8EX
Audio: Audioquest * Video: Bluejeans
My DVDs My HT
|
|
|
07-09-2003, 07:29 PM
|
#4 of 14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Local Time: 03:47 PM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 271
|
I didn't find my old Pioneer to be bright at all, quite the contrary. But, it was a much older model. About ten years or so. One thing I can tell you though, it was sorely underpowered. I paid the same price for my old Pio and my new Yammie. The Pio had 65 more watts per channel (Stereo, I don't have surrounds yet) than my new Yammie, but it actually seems the other way around. Most people think the Yammie to be bright. But I don't see it that way, in my case; however. It just seem to make my CV's much clearer, by way of the extra power one would assume.
Note: The Pio I had was not an Elite. Could make a major difference on that power issue, also the fact that mine was a much older model as well.
|
|
|
07-09-2003, 07:38 PM
|
#5 of 14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Local Time: 03:47 PM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 120
|
I have a Klipsch Ref 3II setup, and use the 45tx with them.
I love the way they mate together, a very pleasing sound.
However, you might want to wait until the new Elites are released supposedly later this month...
The 53tx and 55tx both have 9 band equalizers for the auto-MCACC as opposed to the 5 band on the 45.
It is also unclear (more than just the numbers matter) as to which unit is the replacement for the 45 (which has been discontinued).
It is my understanding that the 55 is basically the 53 with the iLink, but I suppose no one will actually know until the actual specs are released.
All of the info provided comes from the press release, so not much info is out there yet.
BTW:the 53 mrsp is 1500 and the 55 is 1700 i beleive.
Just to give you an idea, the 53 should street right at around 800 when released. 
|
|
|
07-09-2003, 07:39 PM
|
#6 of 14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Local Time: 11:47 AM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 400
|
The Pioneer Elites I have heard were far from bright.
|
|
|
07-09-2003, 10:02 PM
|
#7 of 14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Local Time: 09:47 AM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 105
|
Thanks for all the feedback. I have heard about the 53tx but was startled by the msrp, I keep forgetting that is not actual price. I seems the consensus that the Elites, along with several other brands, will work out with the Klipsch.
|
|
|
07-09-2003, 10:39 PM
|
#8 of 14
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Local Time: 11:47 AM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 7,403
|
You may wish to consider placing something, like a large, thick, woven wall hanging (assuming you don't want to buy/make an acoustic panel) at the first reflection points on the two side walls which may make the Klipsch less fatiguing to your ears.
|
|
|
07-10-2003, 08:14 AM
|
#9 of 14
|
|
Member
Location: Northeastern Oklahoma
Join Date: Sep 1999
Local Time: 09:47 AM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 7,805
|
Chu,
In my experience with Klipschs its very difficult if not impossible to tame their brightness/shrillness. Horn loaded tweeters are just that way and you either love them or hate them.
The Elites as of late should be enough current to drive your Klipschs and from the last listening I did I didn't find them bright at all. Yamahas however I did find bright and fatiguing.
|
|
|
07-10-2003, 08:31 AM
|
#10 of 14
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Local Time: 11:47 AM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 7,403
|
well I agree they're not for everybody but then why buy a speaker that wasn't for you? playing around with determining if mitigating first order reflections by tacking up some heavy blankets is a pretty easy thing to do.
different speakers for different peepers and all that.
|
| |