Jeff: Thanks for the input. I still don't think the price is justified for me. The following isn't meant to attack what you said, I'm just posting it to clarify things for myself.
When I did a side-by-side comparison of the two at Crutchfield.com, the only i/o differences I noticed were the following: The 3803 has one more composite video monitor output (2 vs. 1), one more optical digital input (5 vs. 4), and one more optical digital output (2 vs. 1). This is, without question, more than I need.
This doesn't matter to me A) since the LCD part of the 3803's remote is tiny, and B) I'll likely be buying a 3rd party remote in any case.
True, but for the room I intend to use the receiver in, I think the 2803's power will be more than sufficient.
I don't think I really understand the purpose of this feature, but since I intend to have my DVD player connect straight to the TV via component cable, and my other video sources (PS2, SVHS VCR, PC) connected via video-switching using all S-Video cables, I don't know how upconversion would benefit me.
Right again, but from what I understand the difference between 96/24 and 192/24 is minimal, and I don't have (or intend to purchase anytime in the foreseeable future) any high-res sources such as SACD or DVD-A to take advantage of the 192/24.
So, to me, it still seems like the 2803 is a much better fit for me and my budget. If anybody else knows of any other major differences please let me know, because I'm not aware of any. Thanks!