Hi guys.
I ran photographic labs for 17 years. In the last 5, I had been totally digital at my custom lab.
Chemical printing is much cheaper than digital printing in terms of costs; digital printing can last a lot longer (depending on the printer, ink and paper used). Inkjet, from a good printer, can deliver a result significantly better than chemical can produce.
The chemical format is not inherently better -- my own experience is that you can get a much better result from inkjet, for a lot of reasons that I can get into if you really want to hear about it. But the reason you're seeing better results from a lab than you're getting at home is because the labs basically know what they are doing.
