|
|
 |
|
03-28-2007, 11:34 AM
|
#61 of 220
|
|
Member
Location: Southern Cal
Join Date: Mar 2000
Local Time: 02:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,431
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
Kyle:
It is unfortunately probably a good idea not to get our hopes up unless and until there's explicit confirmation of high resolution aud. If it doesn't say high rez surround it probably isn't.
". . . includes these 13 new songs in hi-resolution audio, the entire album in 5.1 surround sound . . ." could definitely be read to mean, say, 16/48 stereo and lossy surround.
Please do drop in again if you see any specs somewhere.
Last edited by Paul.S : 03-28-2007 at 11:37 AM.
|
|
|
03-28-2007, 11:53 AM
|
#62 of 220
|
|
Kyle
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Local Time: 05:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 566
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
If I find any, I'll report them.
|
|
|
 |
 |
03-28-2007, 12:18 PM
|
#63 of 220
|
|
Kyle
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Local Time: 05:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 566
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
Some general info:
http://online.wsj.com/public/article..._20070803.html
This is all I could find on specs.
http://www.twice.com/article/CA6360704.html
Quote:
In Warner’s case, the music tracks could be in DVD-Video’s traditional 2.0- and 5.1-channel compressed Dolby Digital format, which is playable on all existing DVD–Video players and DVD-ROM drives, or in the two- and 5.1-channel DVD-Audio format, which is playable in any DVD-Audio/Video player that supports the format. If DVD-Audio is used, then the DVD-Audio tracks will also be available on the same disc in compressed Dolby Digital 5.1 in the disc’s video zone and be playable on more common DVD-Video players and PC’s DVD-ROM drives.
|
Sounds like dual-disc. You never knew what you were going to get, except for Sony which never put high-rez audio on it's dvd side. Since Warner backed dvd-audio, I would say there is a fair chance that it has dvd-audio tracks.
Last edited by ElevSkyMovie : 03-28-2007 at 12:30 PM.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
03-28-2007, 03:49 PM
|
#64 of 220
|
|
Kyle
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Local Time: 05:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 566
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
New review, posted at
http://www.getreadytorock.com/reviews2007/rush.htm
Quote:
RUSH Snakes & Arrows Atlantic (2007)
Rush
Nothing concentrates the mind better than having to review a new Rush album after just one solitary play. And after this playback at Atlantic Records HQ in Kensington I was left breathless, if not stunned by the sheer power of an album that stylistically throws in the proverbial kitchen sink.
I suppose after such an enduring and varied musical career, it's not surprising that Rush have gone back to their Proggy musical roots. And with former Foo Fighters Alex Raskulinecz at the controls, the band are given a free reign to indulge their musical excesses, as they stretch out and jam in a post Zeppelin heavy duty deluge that manifests itself in a stunning wall of sound.
Aside from a high in the mix raucous drum sound and some complex arrangements, vocalist Geddy Lee's successfully uses his impressive high range to give full meaning to Neil Peart's esoteric lyrics. Where once there was a thin high register vocal line, there is now a more mature vocalist whose phrasing puts him up there with Robert Plant in his element.
'Snakes & Arrows' opens with the new single 'Far Cry', which after a big, powerful staccato drum intro opens into a slice of melodic hard rock with a lilting chorus. 'A Far Cry' is much more accessible than much of the rest of the album and sets the standard with a belated chorus that stays in the mind long after the conclusion of the song.
The following 'Armor & Sword' features some of Peart's best lyrics, and might be regarded as a metaphor for both personal faith and contemporary world events. The line, 'Our better natures seek elevation, A refuge for the coming night, No One gets to their heaven without a fight', seems to be a personal reflection but can be taken as a wry comment on our times, while 'The suit of shining armor, becomes a keen and bloody sword', is an uncompromising analysis of the machinations of religion and faith.
'Working Them Angels' employs a big wall of sound and is punctuated by urgent time changes which build up a tension that is finally resolved by the 'Working them angels-Overtime' line. 'The Large Bowl' is a more radio friendly affair and is one of the highlights of the album. Opening with an acoustic guitar and a vocal line that recalls Mark Bolan, the hook has a hypnotic quality about it, before Alex Lifeson delivers a trademark solo.
There's more of the evocative big sweep wall of sound on 'Spindrift'. The song cleverly uses natural elements in the lyrics as metaphors and delivers big booming chords and a heavy duty rhythm track topped by some lovely bass notes and jangling guitar.
Guitarist Alex Lifeson sounds a little like U2's The Edge as the band use an ascending chord sequence and a stop time rhythm before plunging back into an explosion of riffs. 'Spindrift' impresses if only for the fact that Rush manage to make the music conjure up the lyrical imagery.
'The Main Monkey Business' is the first and certainly the most impressive of three instrumental outings. It's interesting to see what Rush make of a piece that doesn't have to accommodate the lyrics, and the result is a guitar-led motif with a vaguely Celtic/Zeppelin sounding feel, and a real sense of presence and controlled power. The mid-section slips into a Space Rock outing that resolves itself in a Prog Metal oeuvre as layers of keyboards beef up the melody line.
'Monkey Business' is both coherent, powerful and delivers a polished production without ever losing the essential band dynamic. Another drum intro graces 'The Way the Wind Blows' before giving way to a surprising heavy duty bluesy guitar led shuffle. If anything there are elements of Jethro Tull's soft Metal period of the late 80's with the song's poignant lyrics about the pseudo East/West religious divide glued together by repeated heavy guitar riffs, some belated space rock elements, and impressive vocal swoops. The second instrumental 'Hope' is a pleasant if unchallenging acoustic link piece with a Eastern, almost sea shanty feel, while 'Faithless' is an impressive return to the lyrical raison d'etre of the album. The line 'I've got my own moral compass to steer by' neatly summarises the song's meaning, and it is essentially a simple outing that derives an anthemic quality from some big production trappings that include the use of a mellotron. If 'Faithless' is another high point of the album then 'Bravest Face' continues the upwards curve, with its acoustic intro, some complex crunching chords, and impressive lyrics that dwell on the nature of mankind's duality.
'Good News First' doesn't work as well, with the high register vocals struggling manfully to unravel the lyrical meaning over another big production wall of sound. Curiously enough the sometimes impenetrable nature of the previous track adds lucidity to the following hard hitting rocked out instrumental 'Malignant Narcissism'. This short piece of guitar drenched Space Rock works really well and even finds time for some impressive bass and drum breaks.
The closing 'We Hold On' is the perfect kind of powerful and coherent outing to finish with and features soaring vocals, feverish guitar, a pounding rhythm track and a strong chorus.
'Snakes & Arrows' is a powerful album which in striving to be contemporary is possibly a little heavier and a touch more cluttered than it needed to be. Neil Peart's heartfelt lyrics are impressive throughout, and Geddy Lee's vocals suggest a new maturity. Above all the band find room to jam out enthusiastically, but in occasionally over egging the arrangements and sometimes falling in between the Prog Rock, Space Rock and melodic Metal genres, 'Snakes & Arrows' might be a CD that seeks to consolidate rather than break new ground.
****
Review by Pete Feenstra
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
03-28-2007, 04:30 PM
|
#65 of 220
|
|
Member
Location: Southern Cal
Join Date: Mar 2000
Local Time: 02:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,431
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
Thx, Kyle. I'm avoiding reading reviews for now. A quick skim of that one though reveals that the writer got the co-producer's name wrong.
Anywho, although it's on a different label (RCA), the Raskulinecz-produced One By One has 24-bit/96k stereo and surround tracks. Here's hoping he does the same or better for Snakes.
|
|
|
03-29-2007, 09:33 AM
|
#66 of 220
|
|
Kyle
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Local Time: 05:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 566
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
Here is a link to a pdf file that Anthem put out for retailers. It says the dvd has all 13 tracks in "high resolution audio". I hope that means dvd-audio, but it might just mean 16/48 stereo.
http://www.2112.net/powerwindows/cov...salessheet.pdf
|
|
|
03-29-2007, 10:47 AM
|
#67 of 220
|
|
Member
Location: Southern Cal
Join Date: Mar 2000
Local Time: 02:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,431
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
Thx for that sell sheet PDF link, Kyle.
It's remarkable how it nicely includes so much info, except that which the arguably core audience for the "DVD-Album" wants to know: the rez specs of the aud tracks.
Nathan, to make explicit what already seems implicitly obvious by your not returning to substantiate the claim: unless and until I see some evidence to the contrary, I call b.s. on your claim that a VT remaster "was being held back until the release of the new album." I think we would be seeing promo info about that reissue right alongside S & A info were that true.
It's too bad it's apparently not true though--the absence of a VT remaster compared to every other Atlantic studio album is conspicuous in the "Also Available" discography section of the sell sheet.
|
|
|
 |
 |
03-30-2007, 11:46 AM
|
#68 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Local Time: 05:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 221
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
Paul, Google is an amazing thing. Enter "Vapor Trails Remaster," and it's a click away.  No need to call b.s. on me so quickly in a world of such easily accessed information.
At http://www.2112.net/powerwindows/VTnews.htm#remaster
Quote:
|
"May 16, 2005: Atlantic Records once again delays the release of the Vapor Trails Remaster. Fans hoping for a clean recording without the audio problems found in the original release will have to wait. What is confirmed is that the album has been remastered, and although nothing has been said officially, it is rumored that Atlantic decided to delay releasing the remaster until the next Rush release, as there are apparently plenty of the original in stock."
|
Now, you may doubt the veracity of this rumor. But at least I didn't make it up.
The news on the DVD-album has been some of the best news I've heard in a while. I'm really excited about this release!!!
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
03-30-2007, 12:52 PM
|
#69 of 220
|
|
Member
Location: Southern Cal
Join Date: Mar 2000
Local Time: 02:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,431
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
| . . . you may doubt the veracity of this rumor. |
Nathan, with all due, you're a little foggy on the definition of facts versus rumors. Rumors by definition don't have veracity.
| . . . the remaster of Vapor Trails--which was apparently completed last year--was being held back until the release of the new album. The reasoning was that since there were many of the original VT CDs still in stock, no need to release it yet. |
The delay of the reissue's release is a fact. The reason(s) behind that delay is/are fansite rumor, which you then regurgitated as fact (despite the site explicitly stating that it is rumor).
You may think this is putting too fine a point on it, but given all the speculation, blue balls and disappointment in the past three years over everything from the VT remaster to Rush SA-CDs that never happened, I think it important to be precise and clear: rumor is NOT factual information.
Last edited by Paul.S : 03-30-2007 at 01:14 PM.
|
|
|
 |
 |
03-30-2007, 03:22 PM
|
#70 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Local Time: 05:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,603
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
True high-rez audio or not, I'm just glad that it seems apparent at least we won't have the Vapor Trails debacle this time.
|
|
|
03-30-2007, 04:29 PM
|
#71 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Local Time: 05:54 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 221
|
Re: Rush: "Snakes and Arrows" discussion
Very good point, Scott. I was thinking the same thing. At the very least, they *appear* to have made SQ a priority again.
Paul, I'm willing to allow the rumor to work its magic with me. I read it as hopeful, rather than a reason to anticipate dissapointment. The rumor part is only about the release date. "What is confirmed is that the album has been remastered . . . "
You might think that's flimsy, but I've been reading that particular site for a long while, and I've never read anything that turned out to be unreliable that I can remember. Either way, I don't mind getting my hopes up, even if they're false. It appears we differ in this.
|
| |