|
|
 |
01-26-2004, 11:48 AM
|
#2 of 9
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 05:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,450
|
There wouldn't be a need to use an encoding scheme like DD at all. Given the creativity of the live sound engineer, I imagine you could use just about any speaker array you wanted...
|
|
|
01-26-2004, 12:10 PM
|
#3 of 9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Local Time: 05:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 221
|
Tim, so you're saying that Dolby Digital encoding is unnecessary for live surround, that a sound engineer could produce live surround without it? Or is DD actually inappropriate and/or unusable for live shows?
I was under the impression that the 5.1 format was a way to get surround sound into your home in a small, easy-to-use system, and that this kind of setup is inappropriate for applications involving 10's of 1000's of people. If someone wanted to use it for concerts, could they?
|
|
|
01-26-2004, 12:10 PM
|
#4 of 9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 1999
Local Time: 05:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,593
|
There are several live surround boards, the Beastie Boys did a large scale arena surround tour in the mid 90's. Just like "cd" audio is not involved in the concernt environment, DD5.1 is not involved.
Do need for an encoding scheme at all (especially a lossy scheme like DD)-- live instrumentations can be routed to "surround" placed speakers by the mix engineer.
Vince
|
|
|
01-26-2004, 12:21 PM
|
#5 of 9
|
|
Member
Location: The Land of Oranges, Mickey Mouse, and foreclosures
Join Date: Jan 1999
Local Time: 05:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,985
|
In a live situation, the sound mix would just be routed to whatever speakers (including LFE) that the sound engineer wanted. DD is a compression and encoding scheme for squeezing 6 channels of sound into a single data stream (i.e., one that travels from your DVD player to your decoder via a single cable).
"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick
|
|
|
01-26-2004, 12:36 PM
|
#6 of 9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Local Time: 05:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 221
|
Well, it seems a consensus is developing. Thanks for the help. In the discussion I mentioned above, a couple guys with a lot of technical jargon have kind of "ganged up" on me, and used my audio ignorance to make their opinions sound like facts. I didn't think it made sense to use DD 5.1 in concert, but since I don't have the technical jargon down, I couldn't effectively argue against them. Thanks again.
|
|
|
01-26-2004, 12:56 PM
|
#7 of 9
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 05:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,450
|
LOL....Nathan, I think you're getting the hang of it just fine. DD is an encoding scheme used for the storage and reproduction of multichannel sounds. Since the music would be played live, there would be no need to encode it, as the sound engineer could just bounce the sound to whichever speaker he wanted to in real time.
|
|
|
 |
 |
01-26-2004, 02:36 PM
|
#8 of 9
|
|
Michael Reuben
Administrator
Location: New York City, Lehman Bros. was here
Join Date: Feb 1998
Local Time: 05:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 19,769
|
A few more points:
Quote:
|
Given that it was developed for home theaters (I assume)
|
DD's first application was in movie theaters. It was developed for a wide variety of uses, including theaters, home theaters and HDTV.
Quote:
|
the format is designed to accommodate small satellite speaker systems that divert low frequencies to the LFE channel
|
The opposite is true: DD was designed to provide five full-range channels (as opposed to the old Dolby Surround, which had frequency limitations in the rear channels). The fact that many HT systems use speakers that are less than full-range, thus require receivers with crossover to divert low frequencies to the subwoofer, results from equipment design, not the DD format.
Also, do not confuse the LFE channel (the ".1" in "5.1") with bass frequencies in general. There is nothing in the LFE channel that could not be included in any of the five other channels, and indeed there have been some mixes that don't use the LFE channel at all. It's there to give sound designers the option of including an extra "boost" to the low frequencies if they so choose.
M.
"Most people never have to face the fact that, at the right time and the right place, they're capable of anything." -- Chinatown
"What kind of movies would there be if everyone in them had to do what we thought they should do?" -- Roger Ebert
HTF Beginner's Primer and FAQ
|
|
|
 |
 |
01-31-2004, 07:39 AM
|
#9 of 9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Local Time: 10:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 12
|
As an ex live engineer myself (retired due to injury), I cannot even begin to imagine why on earth I would ever want to use a perceptual (ie lossy) compression algo at a show!
Technically it would be easy to do, but WHY?
If I needed more punch in the low end, I used to have a feed into the subs from Aux1 on the desk, and wind in what I needed from the channel - so if I wanted a bit extra on the Bass guitar, or whatever, just dial it in from the Aux.
At a live show, you need all the poke you have. I certainly wouldn't shoot myself in the foot by throwing away 10/11 of my audio!
www.opusproductions.com
Digital Audio Specialists
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|