|
|
 |
|
08-28-2001, 03:00 AM
|
#1 of 58
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Local Time: 02:14 AM
Local Date: 10-14-2008
Posts: 1,250
|
Remake of The Wicker Man in the works (BEWARE SERIOUS SPOILER IN LINK!)
|
|
|
08-28-2001, 03:48 AM
|
#2 of 58
|
|
Cees Alons
Administrator
Location: Amsterdam, Holland
Join Date: Aug 1997
Local Time: 08:14 AM
Local Date: 10-14-2008
Posts: 18,191
|
Aryn,
I changed your topic title to warn members that the story in the link you gave contains a very serious spoiler.
Whoever didn't see The Wicker Man yet and doesn't want to have his/her experience spoiled, do not read that article!
Cees
[Edited last by Cees Alons on August 28, 2001 at 03:50 AM]
|
|
|
 |
 |
08-28-2001, 07:07 AM
|
#3 of 58
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Local Time: 10:14 PM
Local Date: 10-13-2008
Posts: 2,440
|
Urk. Where's that puke smiley now that I really need it?
I believe this says it all:
quote:
"I was told it was a very remarkable film in some ways, but when I went to see it at a showing in New York I didn't think it was that good," said one executive. "However, it is a very 'remakable' film and when Nicolas Cage suddenly became interested we started to respond to it."
[/quote]
Somehow I'm just not surprised that (1) an exec at Universal doesn't like one of the most unusual and fascinating films I've ever seen and (2) he only got interested in it because of a big name star.
BTW, I've been thinking about spoilers wrt Wicker Man. Of course, everything should be done to protect plot points from those who haven't seen it, but...what about the title itself?
------------------
My DVDs
"Some people think I'm over-prepared, paranoid...maybe even a little crazy. But they never met any pre-Cambrian life forms, did they?"
[Edited last by Julie K on August 28, 2001 at 07:29 AM]
[Edited last by Julie K on August 28, 2001 at 07:30 AM]
|
|
|
 |
 |
08-28-2001, 08:07 AM
|
#4 of 58
|
|
Michael Reuben
Administrator
Location: New York City, Lehman Bros. was here
Join Date: Feb 1998
Local Time: 02:14 AM
Local Date: 10-14-2008
Posts: 19,596
|
All true, Julie, but the article also says that Neil LaBute is attached to the project. If LaBute writes the script and directs, the results could be interesting. He has a knack for presenting obsessed, repellant characters in a way that makes them seem both logical and compelling (the best example being his series of one-act plays called Bash).
M.
|
|
|
08-28-2001, 09:39 AM
|
#5 of 58
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Local Time: 10:14 PM
Local Date: 10-13-2008
Posts: 2,440
|
Quote:
He has a knack for presenting obsessed, repellant characters in a way that makes them seem both logical and compelling
|
That could work, then, as long as other things are handled in a manner similar to the original.
| Spoiler: |
What I like about the original is that while Howie is obsessed and a character whom you really don't like, neither does the audience feel good when he's burned alive. I hope the remake can avoid the trap of (1) making Howie so repulsive that the audience is glad he's killed or (2) making the islanders one-dimensional badguys and I'm not sure a Universal-backed movie is up to the task.
|
------------------
My DVDs
"Some people think I'm over-prepared, paranoid...maybe even a little crazy. But they never met any pre-Cambrian life forms, did they?"
|
|
|
08-28-2001, 11:14 AM
|
#6 of 58
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Local Time: 01:14 AM
Local Date: 10-14-2008
Posts: 353
|
What's the point?
Generally speaking I hate remakes - esp. when something is a "bonafide" cinema classic already. This one looks to have no hope right from the start.
Casting Cage as Howie seems to be a particularly poor choice ... He would more likely join right in with the Pagans instead of being a believable prude
The setting of it the US makes no sense either. Part of the Beauty of "The Wickerman" was the use pagan Celtic rituals that were native to the region before the Christian invasion. There is no pagan tradition in the US to fall back on, so the entire premise would seem to fall apart.
Maybe Cage will will feel the need to play Charles Foster Kane next 
|
|
|
08-28-2001, 02:08 PM
|
#7 of 58
|
|
Michael Reuben
Administrator
Location: New York City, Lehman Bros. was here
Join Date: Feb 1998
Local Time: 02:14 AM
Local Date: 10-14-2008
Posts: 19,596
|
The same considerations ("remakes are bad", "classics shouldn't be touched", "the setting shouldn't be changed") should have precluded Sergio Leone from remaking Yojimbo as For a Few Dollars More. I'm glad they didn't, though.
Playwrights, novelists and filmmakers have been borrowing and retelling stories for centuries. There's nothing inherently wrong with remakes. It's just that most of them are badly done.
M.
|
|
|
08-29-2001, 06:07 AM
|
#8 of 58
|
|
Cees Alons
Administrator
Location: Amsterdam, Holland
Join Date: Aug 1997
Local Time: 08:14 AM
Local Date: 10-14-2008
Posts: 18,191
|
Julie,
I disagree with you that the title is a spoiler. The thing is part of a ritual we learn to know late in the movie. It solves a few questions, but is not particular.
And no viewer
| Spoiler: | | would expect it to have a heart. |
Cees
|
|
|
08-29-2001, 08:52 AM
|
#9 of 58
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Local Time: 01:14 AM
Local Date: 10-14-2008
Posts: 353
|
Michael,
Thanks for being so dismissive.
My reading of the article suggests that they just want to make the same film, but with an American cast. This (IMHO) is not a good justification for remaking a classic.
Changing a story from one about Japanese Samurai - in Japanese - to an "American" Western or adapting literature is not a remake, but an adaptation. This is different.
The very heart of "The Wickerman" is its grounding in Celtic Traditions. I could see the story being adapted as a Mexican film in which the ancient Mayan/Aztec practices are used, but North America lacks the rich pagan tradition that would make this a true cautionary tale like the original.
If cage and crew just uses the basic idea and finds a uniquely American version of the cult and DOES NOT use the same ending, then it may be a worthwhile story....but not "The Wickerman" and that's my point.
|
|
|
|