Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum

Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum Forum Search: 
 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum


 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Entertainment and Media > Movies (Theatrical)
[ *** Official SESSION 9 Review and Discussion Thread ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-11-2001, 07:17 PM   #1 of 15
Jason Seaver
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Local Time: 11:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 12,119

Send a message via AIM to Jason Seaver
*** Official "SESSION 9" Review Thread


Session 9 is an okay movie. It could have been terrific. From what I gather, Brad Anderson saw the Danvers State Mental Hospital and knew it would be the perfect setting for a horror movie. And he's right; this out-of-the-way, gothic, huge, decrepit building with various bits of bad history associated with it just crawls with atmosphere. To make it even scarier, Anderson posits that the building is loaded with asbestos, meaning that the dust all over everything is not just eerie, but dangerous.

So he sends a asbestos abatement crew (populated by well-acted, interesting characters) in there, under an extremely tight deadline (1 week for a job that should take at least three), has one of them find a series of tapes detailing 9 sessions by one patient with multiple personalities, and lets the story unfold.

Which it does. Slowly. With numerous red herrings. And, most unfotunately, no sense of urgency. We're told that hazmat disposal is a stressful job, and that there's a tight deadline with an associated bonus, but none of the characters ever really seem to particularly aware of it. This situation, which should be setting everyone on edge, doesn't do that so well. The last act does ratchet the suspense up more, but it tosses some things that had taken up a good chunk of screen time to the side.

One thing about the ending I did like, though, was the ambiguity (BTW, I'm serious about the spoilers):
Spoiler:
It's not explicitly spelled out whether the killings are a result of some sort of demonic possession, or whether Gordon just snaps. The former is hinted at, but not made anything close to explicit, although the latter is more frightening, IMHO.


One technical note: I think this is the first movie in (semi-)wide release shot using Sony's 24p high-resolution digital motion-picture cameras (The Anniversery Party and Timecode were both merely HDTV); I know Jason X and Attack Of The Clones won't be released for a while, while Spy Kids 2 won't start shooting for another month. Anyway, it looks fantastic, 2.35 widescreen and no hint of grain, and I only knew this because I stayed through the end credits. As unimpressed as I was with DLP, this "digital film" looks like the real deal.
Jason Seaver is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-11-2001, 08:37 PM   #2 of 15
Chris Dugger
Member
 
Location: West Palm Beach, Fl.
Join Date: Jun 1998
Local Time: 07:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 1,677

Send a message via AIM to Chris Dugger
This thread is now the Official Review Thread for "Session 9". Please post all HTF member reviews in this thread. Any other comments, links to other reviews, or discussion items will be deleted from this thread without warning!

Again, without warning, I will delete all posts that are not a HTF member review!

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Dugger
Chris Dugger is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-12-2001, 08:00 PM   #3 of 15
Julie K
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Local Time: 07:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 2,440

I really enjoyed this movie (even if I did leave the theater feeling somewhat shellshocked - but isn't that the feeling horror is supposed to leave you with?). This is the film that Blair Witch wanted to be, but failed at.

It's not for everyone. It moves slowly. I haven't been able to believe my good fortune at finding two movies, Session 9 and The Others, that haven't been afraid to take their time at setting up the story and mood instead of jumping into non-stop action.

I for one would be extremely pleased if teeny bopper slasher fare becomes extinct and the new horror is born from Session 9 and The Others.

------------------
My DVDs

"Some people think I'm over-prepared, paranoid...maybe even a little crazy. But they never met any pre-Cambrian life forms, did they?"
Julie K is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-16-2001, 01:55 PM   #4 of 15
Michael Reuben
Michael Reuben
Administrator
 
Location: New York City, Bear Stearns was here
Join Date: Feb 1998
Local Time: 11:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 19,404

I enjoyed Session 9 more than The Others. While Session 9 isn't as tightly constructed, it benefits from the novelty of its setting. It's hard to forget, when you're watching The Others, that the setting is a classic location for a ghost story. Session 9 has a setting unlike any I've seen before, and the place itself gave me the creeps. Perhaps because I found the setting so interesting to explore (from the safety of a movie theater!), the film never felt slow to me.

I concur with Jason's observations about the quality of the hi-def digital photography. The color, clarity and detail are astonishing, which is even more remarkable if (as I suspect) the 2.35:1 framing was created by cropping a 1.78:1 image. I know there are a lot of technical arguments about film vs. digital, but as far as I'm concerned, Session 9 answers all the objections. This format delivers the goods.

M.
Michael Reuben is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-21-2001, 02:19 AM   #5 of 15
Mark Cappelletty
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 08:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 2,851

Saw this in LA tonight after getting back from vacation yesterday. USA Films doesn't seem to know how to open a film if the executives' lives depended on it (Series 7 -- which I saw in freakin' March -- never hit Cincinnati, where my best friend lives, at all), so who knows when it'll hit the Midwest.

While not without its problems, particularly the too-rushed ending, this is an extremely frightening and atmospheric piece that literally had me jittering with nervous tension. Peter Mullan (from the great, largely unseen The Claim) is rock-solid and the writers do a terrific job in peeling back his unhappy life layer by layer.

I can't remember when I saw a good horror movie in the theaters (I think it was Stir of Echoes, nearly 2 years ago!) and to get this and The Others in the same week is a most enjoyable -- and frightening -- one-two punch.

The 24-frame digital photography is largely rock-solid, but not perfect yet. It looked more like blown-up 16mm than 35mm stock, but that could just be becuase I knew this was digital to begin with.
Mark Cappelletty is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-22-2001, 10:06 AM   #6 of 15
Holadem
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Local Time: 11:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 8,849

This is one movie that left me COLD. It has some memorable scenes (power outage) but overall it was just too dull. I found the voice "DO it now.." very annoying. The ending just didn't work for me. I felt like we were supposed to say "wow, so that is what happened" and found out I didn't care what happened. This is no "The Others". Oh well...

--
Holadem
Holadem is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 04-07-2004, 11:23 AM   #7 of 15
Andres Munoz
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Local Time: 11:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 3,417

Session 9: I'm confused (spoilers inside)


Spoiler Alert: This thread is not recommended if you haven't watched the movie!

.
.
.

I'm really confused after watching this movie. So what was the relationship between Mary and her multiple personalities (as heard on the session tapes) and the killer?

Gordon never listened to the tapes so why did he flip out?


Andres Munoz is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 04-07-2004, 04:42 PM   #8 of 15
Justin_S
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 03:50 PM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 3,387

Gordon flipped out because the Simon entity from the session tapes possessed him. Notice that Gordon hears the voice before the tapes are even discovered. There's also the classic end quote by Simon which gives even further proof to this. As for Mary, Princess and Billy were her only true multiple personalities, while Simon was an entity that had possessed her.


Justin_S is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 04-12-2004, 03:46 PM   #9 of 15
Andres Munoz
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Local Time: 11:50 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 3,417

But there is no indication that Gordon gets possessed by anything.
And the weird thing is this. Towards the end of the movie and by the sound of it (because it wasn't shown) we find out that Gordon actually killed his wife and kid and even his dog. Now this happened even before he got the job, didn't it?
I mean, wasn't he already limping the first time we saw him? And his limp was caused by the incident with his wife in the kitchen where he burns his leg with boiling water. This incident ends with Gordon just going nuts and killing his family.

I don't know. Maybe I got the timeline wrong but I don't think so. It looks more like Gordon just flipped but again, there is not much explanation as to why.


Andres Munoz is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 04-12-2004, 05:08 PM   #10 of 15
Justin_S
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 03:50 PM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 3,387

Gordon kills them after he first visits Danvers. He also first heard Simon's voice when he was staring at the wheelchair. I see it that he was definitely possessed. That's my take anyways.


Justin_S is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket