|
|
 |
|
03-30-2002, 10:46 PM
|
#61 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Local Time: 05:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,659
|
so how's ET going to do this weekend?
|
|
|
03-30-2002, 11:17 PM
|
#62 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Local Time: 04:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,723
|
Probably somewhere around $7-$8 million. The friday-to-friday drop was about 47%
|
|
|
03-31-2002, 11:17 PM
|
#63 of 89
|
|
Member
Location: Gurgaon, India
Join Date: Dec 1969
Local Time: 03:10 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 804
|
The estimated collections for the weekend is $6,130,000 with a huge drop of 57% over the prior weekend. The cume so far from the re-run is now $24,300,000. The film seems to be doing a lot poorer than other recent re-releases.
Sanjay
Member since 1997
|
|
|
04-01-2002, 01:17 AM
|
#65 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Local Time: 02:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,266
|
Quote:
|
The estimated collections for the weekend is $6,130,000 with a huge drop of 57% over the prior weekend.
|
The drop of Blade II was even higher at an estimated 60%. The re-release is not doing well as previously anticipated. It is now estimated to settle around $35M.
Ice Age came out as a surprise hit from Fox, a wild card that Universal was probably not expecting.
~Edwin
|
|
|
04-01-2002, 09:05 AM
|
#66 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Local Time: 04:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 7,684
|
So my $40M theory wasn't too off at all...this one just didn't seem like it would be a huge theatrical hit. I expect the DVD to sell like MAD though!
Take care,
Chuck
|
|
|
04-01-2002, 11:14 PM
|
#67 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Local Time: 04:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,060
|
The DVD is slated for August, right?
|
|
|
04-02-2002, 04:29 AM
|
#68 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 09:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,134
|
Heck, if I were them I would bump up that DVD release so all of that advertising money (which was probably not made back by the films recent theatrical run) does not go to waste. 
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 01:11 AM
|
#69 of 89
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Local Time: 03:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,039
|
This is probably the gold-plated bona-fide example of a populace NOT wanting a beloved film #@$%ed with. The truth is, my generation grew up with E.T. and Star Wars, my generation was pissed off with the "Greedo Shoots First" version of Star Wars, and we had no desire to see a politically-correct version of E.T.
Mel Gibson just learned the same lession with the re-release of The Passion. Nobody pays money to go the movies to see *less* of a beloved film, or to see a sanitized version of that film.
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 06:28 AM
|
#70 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Local Time: 09:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 428
|
Yes Ernest, that, or kids today only want to marvel at comic superheros.
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 07:27 AM
|
#71 of 89
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Local Time: 10:40 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,483
|
Ernest, just curiosity - why did you revive a thread that's three years old to make the 'Greedo didn't shoot first' argument?
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 07:39 AM
|
#72 of 89
|
|
| |