|
|
 |
|
10-31-2003, 08:21 AM
|
#211 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Local Time: 02:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,266
|
Yes, I agree with Walter as far as some of the films he listed that are better than Gladiator. But the problem is, none of those films hit a chord with the *majority* of the general public as much as Gladiator did.
~Edwin
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 12:18 PM
|
#212 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 02:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 323
|
Here's the thing about 'hitting chords' with the majority of the general public. Such movies are not neccesarily good, because they often pander to the lowest common denominator. Look at any hugely successfull action film. Gladiator succeeded because it made that denominator feel more sophisticated without ever actually being so. Gladiator looks classy, Gladiator sounds classy, but Gladiator is not a great movie. The substance isn't their, only the pretense of substance. In my estimation, Gladiator is a fair film and nothing more. Of course, these are merely my own meager opinions on the matter, I do not think to presume to tell anyone else how they should feel about the film.
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 12:35 PM
|
#213 of 220
|
|
Member
Location: London, England
Join Date: Apr 2000
Local Time: 09:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 12,857
|
It was the academy members who voted Gladiator best movie of 2000, people who work in the movie industry, so it's not as if only the man in the street liked the picture.
It was a two horse race between Traffic and Gladiator for the top spot, Traffic got the Best Director nod, while Gladiator had to make do with Best Picture of the year, and Best Actor of the year, I have no problems with that, but it would have been nice if Ridley Scott had got an Oscar too.
I agree with one member who remarked that the more popular a film becomes the less liked it is by the snooty film snob elite, spot on.
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 12:42 PM
|
#214 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Local Time: 02:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,266
|
Quote:
|
I agree with one member who remarked that the more popular a film becomes the less liked it is by the snooty film snob elite, spot on.
|
Agree. Even Memento is now getting a backlash.
~Edwin
|
|
|
 |
 |
10-31-2003, 12:49 PM
|
#215 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Local Time: 04:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
|
Such movies are not neccesarily good, because they often pander to the lowest common denominator. Look at any hugely successfull action film. Gladiator succeeded because it made that denominator feel more sophisticated without ever actually being so. Gladiator looks classy, Gladiator sounds classy, but Gladiator is not a great movie
|
Oh my god. I could spend a lot of time with this, but I will not. I think I love Gladiator, but obviously I'm mistaken, it's not even a good movie!
Quote:
|
I agree with one member who remarked that the more popular a film becomes the less liked it is by the snooty film snob elite, spot on
|
This couldn't be more true. It's like these guys that lived next door to me in college. 100,000 people would go to the football games every weekend, but they hated football. Why? Simply because they hated how everyone else liked it. They would hate anything that mass audiences liked because, and they would admit this, that they were smarter than them and wouldn't associate with what the peons do.
|
|
|
 |
 |
10-31-2003, 12:50 PM
|
#216 of 220
|
|
Member
Location: Lexington, KY
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 04:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 8,424
|
Quote:
|
I agree with one member who remarked that the more popular a film becomes the less liked it is by the snooty film snob elite, spot on.
|
First person to scientifically define that relationship gets to have the process named after them.
I'm hard-pressed to find a large quantity of evidence that is contrary to that statement. You'll always find exceptions, but in small cases though.
|
|
|
10-31-2003, 12:58 PM
|
#217 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Local Time: 02:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,266
|
Quote:
|
Gladiator succeeded because it made that denominator feel more sophisticated without ever actually being so.
|
Wow. One couldn't get any more condescending than that.
~Edwin
|
|
|
 |
 |
10-31-2003, 01:12 PM
|
#218 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 02:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
|
Wow. One couldn't get any more condescending than that.
|
Oh sure I could, but condescention isn't the point. I went into Gladiator really excited. I had been waiting for Galdiator for a long time, I wanted to love it. I sat through it, and came out feeling completely indifferent to the entire experience. What *I* saw (and I'm stressing the I here) was a film that was doing it's best too look and sound a lot more epic and important than it really was. The plot was simplistic and plodding, the acting was for the most part monotone and uninspired save for a few notable exceptions. The film had the potential to be so much more than it was.
Quote:
|
I think I love Gladiator, but obviously I'm mistaken, it's not even a good movie!
|
I will refer you to the end of my post, where I explicitly state that these are purely my opinions on the film and I do not presume to tell anyone else how they should feel about the film. If you love Gladiator, that's great. I'm glad the film worked for you and that you got something out of it. It didn't work for me, and I'm merely trying to articulate my personal opinion on the film.
Quote:
|
I agree with one member who remarked that the more popular a film becomes the less liked it is by the snooty film snob elite, spot on
|
Certainly, you see it all the time. However, that doesn't mean that someone who doesn't like a popular film isn't justified in their dislike. I don't dislike Gladiator because it was popular, I dislike it because I thought it was a poor film that could have been so much more. My dislike is compounded by the fact that I truly wanted it to be great, and the fact that it wasn't was a huge blow.
Anyway, keep in mind, these are purely *my* opinions, try not to take personal offence, I'm not trying to take away anyone's right to like this film, just stating the reason why I dislike the film.
|
|
|
 |
 |
10-31-2003, 01:21 PM
|
#219 of 220
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 03:44 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,810
|
Quote:
|
I agree with one member who remarked that the more popular a film becomes the less liked it is by the snooty film snob elite, spot on.
|
Since the phrase 'becomes' is used, which denotes a delta; I can only surmise that this statement suggests that film enthusiasts are modulating their opinions. I completely disagree. While opinions may change upon revisits of the film in question; I tend to believe that most individuals have fairly static opinions of film.
Opinions of a film in the context of Awards are an entirely different matter, which is the crux of the contention about a title like Gladiator. Also, opinions may be more forcefully or frequently communicated on boards such this one due to the notoriety of a film, but this represents a change in exposure, not a change of opinion.
- Walter.
|
|
|
|