Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Live Search: 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum




 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Entertainment and Media > Movies (Theatrical)
[ The Lord Of The Rings (Bakshi) ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-29-2001, 06:08 PM   #31 of 105
Jeff Kleist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Local Time: 04:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 15,037

Send a message via ICQ to Jeff Kleist Send a message via AIM to Jeff Kleist
Quote:
It's true that a movie shot Super35 will have less resolution than one shot anamorphic. But DVD has MUCH less resolution than either film format. The puny resolution of a DVD can't capture the full resolution of film, even Super35. Wouldn't the extra resolution of an anamorphic film just be lost once you "shrunk" it down for DVD anyway?

In the computer world, there's a term GIGO for Garbage in, garbage out. If you start with more information, the end result will be far superior. Look at discs mastered from LD transfers and compare that to the High-def DVD masters. Noticeable right? With enough time, money and processing spent, Super35 transfers can look pretty darn good on DVD (Rock, Se7en) but the majority do NOT look comparable to comparable anamorphic transfers.

Look at Blade, and compare it to "The Matrix". Both films are heavily processed. Which looks sharper? Deeper blacks? More detail? It's Blade
Jeff Kleist is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2001, 02:43 AM   #32 of 105
Bill McA
Member
 
Location: Hamilton, ON Canada
Join Date: Oct 2000
Local Time: 04:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,512

Quote:
Now I gotta go out and buy American Pop. So far this month, I've watched Fritz the Cat and LOTR, and it still ain't enough. Besides Pop, the only other Bakshi out there on dvd is Heavy Traffic, and I hear it's pan and scan... boo! hiss!! And if they come out with Wizards soon, I'm gonna go postal!

Ben

I believe Heavy Traffic is open matte rather than P&S, but I'm not 100% sure as I never saw it theatrically.
American Pop is terrific with lots of kick-ass rotoscoping!!!
The opening pogrom scene looks fantastic!




My DVD Collection Film Lists: 2001 (416), 2002 (412), 2003 (374), 2004 (346), 2005 (302), 2006 (221) Film Tracking 2005 (862), 2006 (852) Last 15 Watched: Pulse (2006,Jim Sonzero) 2/5, In the Realm of the Senses (1976,Nagisa Oshima) 4/5, Sing a Song of Sex (1967,Nagisa Oshima) 2/5, The Passionate Friends (1949,David Lean) 3/5, Band of Ninja (1967,Nagisa Oshima) 1/5, Saw V (2008,David Hackl) 3/5, Quantum of Solace (2008,Marc Forster) 2/5, Role Models (2008,David Wain) 3/5, Dorm (2006,Songyos Sugmakanan) 3/5, Candy (2006,Neil Armfield) 3/5, Shutter (2004,Banjong Pisanthanakun, Parkpoom Wongpoom) 1/5, Skinwalkers (2006,Jim Isaac) 2/5, Out of Season (1998,Jeanette L. Buck) 2/5, Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence (1983,Nagisa Oshima) 5/5, The Catch (1961,Nagisa Oshima) 3/5
Bill McA is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2001, 11:26 PM   #33 of 105
Duane M Davis
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Local Time: 05:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 64

I actually like the look of the Bakshi film. It gives it a "pop art" look and is very unique. I can think of no other film that resembles it. Also, it's not "lazy". In interviews with Bakshi, he says they cut his budget way down after he had already started, forcing him to take shortcuts and not finish things the way he wanted to. He fully intended to completely animate the entire film.
As to the use of Super35. It's already been stated that with the forced perspective shots that fill the picture, 'scope lenses would not have worked. 'Scope lenses introduce a distortion that would have made the trick photography in this film quite impossible.



\"Would you like to play spider with me?\" ~Spider Baby

Duane M Davis is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-31-2001, 06:27 AM   #34 of 105
TheoGB
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Local Time: 09:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,857

Send a message via ICQ to TheoGB
I couldn't watch past Bree. Like that sarcasm article stated, the use of live action people coloured in there was just too ridiculous. Sometimes you need some help suspending disbelief you know...


TheoGB is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-30-2002, 05:02 PM   #35 of 105
Norm
Member
 
Location: Formally Boca Raton, FL now Media, Pa
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 04:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,475

If I watch Ralph Bakshi's version will it spoil the next two Rings movies, or does it just focus on FOTR?


Norm is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-30-2002, 06:05 PM   #36 of 105
John_Berger
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Local Time: 04:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,682

Send a message via AIM to John_Berger
Quote:
If I watch Ralph Bakshi's version will it spoil the next two Rings movies
It's the entire story; however, the movie itself is already spoiled. Do yourself a favor and read the books instead. Bakshi's version is simply horrendous and impossible to watch IMHO.
John_Berger is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-30-2002, 06:15 PM   #37 of 105
Rob Gillespie
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Local Time: 10:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 12,160

It's not the entire story. It goes about as far as the end of the battle of Helm's Deep from The Two Towers.



No longer here.
Rob Gillespie is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-30-2002, 07:09 PM   #38 of 105
Norm
Member
 
Location: Formally Boca Raton, FL now Media, Pa
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 04:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 3,475

How far into the book The Two Towers is the Battle of Helm's Deep?


Norm is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-30-2002, 07:39 PM   #39 of 105
Ben Osborne
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Local Time: 03:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 524

Helm's Deep occurs before the halfway point in the book, but the book doesn't cut back and forth between the two major plotlines like the Peter Jackson movie does. So chronologically, and in the Jackson movie, Helm's Deep takes place close to the end of TTT.



Ben Osborne is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-30-2002, 11:17 PM   #40 of 105
Ricardo C
Ricardo C
Member
 
Location: Venezuela
Join Date: Feb 2002
Local Time: 05:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,142

Send a message via MSN to Ricardo C Send a message via Yahoo to Ricardo C
Bakshi, Bakshi, Bakshi... What can I say about this film?

Well, as a kid, I ADORED it. I still have the photonovel as well As an adult who has seen PJ's version... Well, I still like Bakshi's film, but it feels... Wrong in parts. Line delivery is average, music is sub-par, and while the rotoscoping gives it that distinct Bakshi feel (a good thing, btw), the fact that some scenes feature segements of colored live action footage, rather than full rotoscoped work, makes it feel cheap. Look at Merry and Pippin fighting the Orcs, for example. It's mostly touched-up live footage. It's as if someone cut off funding for the picture towards the end. The background characters in Bree are pretty lame, as well.

That said, I still find it likable, and PJ must agree with me, since he paid homage to a couple of Bakshi's shots:

The shot of the Ring "abandoning Gollum" is pretty much identical in both versions, as is the shot of old man Proudfoot (Proudfeet!) at the Party.
Ricardo C is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-30-2002, 11:43 PM   #41 of 105
TheLongshot
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Local Time: 05:43 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,439

Send a message via AIM to TheLongshot Send a message via Yahoo to TheLongshot
I've always liked Bakshi's LOTR, as incomplete and as flawed as it is. Personally, back then I didn't know any better. It also got me to read the books, which probably wouldn't have happened any other way. Personally, the strength of this film is where Jackson's film is the weakest: going from Hobbiton to Rivendell. I also liked the way the Balrog was handled in that film as well.

For years, it was the only visual version that I had a reference to, and I still think it was a pretty good effort.

Jason