[MandyHan]

Did anyone see this last year in 3D? I want to go see it this year because I heard they're re-releasing it again starting on Oct. 19. I think it's a perfect movie to make 3D...so if anyone saw it, let me know!

[Jeff Jacobson]

I saw it in 3-D last year. The 3-D effect worked well.

[Adam Lenhardt]

I saw it last year as well. Don't expect any dramatic difference from the 2D version; very few shots jump out at you. Mostly the 3D is used to add depth to the picture, and on that level it works incredibly well. I sort of felt like I was inside the movie at times.

[MandyHan]

It sounds like it's a pretty fun experience to watch it in 3D, and I'm definitely going to grab a group of my friends who like it as much as me to go see it. Are you guys going to see it again this year? I think it would make a for a fun Halloween tradition for me.

[IanDP]

I saw it last year in 3-D. It was my first time seeing it. I definitely recommend it, especially if you haven't seen it yet.

[MandyHan]

I've seen the original movie and I just love it...Tim Burton is one of my heroes. Thanks so much for the 3D recommendations, I'm really excited now to go out and see it on Halloween night.

[Chris Roberts]

I saw it last year and wasn't impressed. Everything looked too grey and even Zero's nose was very muted to me. I know its a darker-toned movie, but what colors there are seem more vibrant on my DVD (like the patchwork in Sally's dress) compared to the 3D version. Maybe I saw a bad screening of it though. Still a great movie, but I'd rather have seen it theatrically without the 3D layering since I didn't feel it added anything but gimmick.

[TheBat]

I also saw it last year in 3D. they also let you keep the 3D glasses.

Jacob

[Adam Lenhardt]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Roberts

I saw it last year and wasn't impressed. Everything looked too grey and even Zero's nose was very muted to me. I know its a darker-toned movie, but what colors there are seem more vibrant on my DVD (like the patchwork in Sally's dress) compared to the 3D version.

That's inherent in 3D projection. Polarized glasses by definition only let in the light angled in a certain direction; that's how the 3D effect is created. However, the loss of all the other light shooting off in other directions decreases the vibrancy. In this case, I don't think it was a deal breaker by any means.

[MandyHan]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam Lenhardt

That's inherent in 3D projection. Polarized glasses by definition only let in the light angled in a certain direction; that's how the 3D effect is created. However, the loss of all the other light shooting off in other directions decreases the vibrancy. In this case, I don't think it was a deal breaker by any means.

Wow, a science lesson and a movie recommendation! I think I'll still go see it if you say it's not a deal breaker, nothing could really ruin this movie for me as it's one of my favorites.

[Sam Favate]

Hoping to check this out tonight. Looking forward to it.

[ChrisBEA]

Saw it last year and loved it!