|
|
 |
|
03-30-2005, 04:28 AM
|
#61 of 289
|
|
Adam_S
Member
Location: Marina del Rey, CA
Join Date: Feb 2001
Local Time: 09:35 AM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,060
|
I can't think of any really violent scenes in Oldboy, I remember it as intense, but nothing like the violence "because violence is the coolest thing ever yo" Tarentino uses. Sure there's the corridor and penthouse fights, but the film didn't feel all that violent to me; really intense and impactful but not that violent. Oh wait, I'm thinking of violence as mainly actions perpetuated directly upon a person by outside means--such as fighting or beatings, not quite the more mental warfare (and its tangible results) the protagonist and antagonist wage in Oldboy. or maybe I'm just wierd.
What'd you think of 800 Bullets? I see it in your signature, and it never really had a decent release in the US.
Adam
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 11:50 AM
|
#62 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 12:35 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,555
|
.
Last edited by Arman : 09-24-2006 at 11:55 PM.
|
|
|
03-31-2005, 01:09 PM
|
#63 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Local Time: 12:35 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 12,185
|
Robots
6 of 10
While the CGI is nice enough and the characters and setting are interesting, fun designs, the film itself really lacks a spark. Sometimes it is funny, but not nearly often enough. The problem isn't that its formula, though it is. The problem seems to be in the editing, direction and writing, all of which kill most of the comedic timing.
The film COULD have lots of great gags, but too often they are stepped on or not set up right in the first place. Maybe they were on paper and the direction is bad. Maybe they got to "film" and then were edited bad.
All I could think of was "Spies Like Us", good talent, funny situations, but cut all wrong for the jokes.
|
|
|
04-02-2005, 11:40 AM
|
#64 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 12:35 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,555
|
.
Last edited by Arman : 09-24-2006 at 11:55 PM.
|
|
|
04-03-2005, 07:36 PM
|
#65 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 09:35 AM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,496
|
Finally got my list up and running. So much for my New Year's resolution of not procrastinating so much. 
|
|
|
04-05-2005, 01:54 AM
|
#66 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Local Time: 12:35 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 12,185
|
Sin City
9.5 of 10
Comic book film noir (review in official review thread). One of the best films I'll see this year, and I might yet bump it to 10 and call it one of the best I've seen in years.
|
|
|
04-11-2005, 12:49 AM
|
#68 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 12:35 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,555
|
.
Last edited by Arman : 09-24-2006 at 11:56 PM.
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 10:49 AM
|
#69 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Local Time: 10:35 AM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,266
|
 Danny Boyle's Millions
At Bat: Sin City
~Edwin
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 09:12 AM
|
#70 of 289
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Local Time: 10:35 AM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,266
|
 Robert Rodriguez's Sin City
At Bat: The Upside Of Anger
~Edwin
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 11:39 AM
|
#71 of 289
|
|
Member
Location: St. Louis, MO
Join Date: Feb 2000
Local Time: 05:35 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 10,460
|
My first two films of 2005 are
Sin City: I was really only impressed by Mickey Rourke in the Marv sequence. The other two are long on style but suffer from actors who can't sell Miller's hard boiled dialogue and have to simply act tough, i | |