Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Live Search: 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum




 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Entertainment and Media > Movies (Theatrical)
[ Jumpy Camera Technique getting old! ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-28-2005, 04:38 PM   #31 of 37
TonyD
Member
 
Location: where ever my wife lets me
Join Date: Dec 1999
Local Time: 12:32 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 10,151

Send a message via AIM to TonyD View Member's Myspace Profile
i dislike the shaky cam thing very much.
as others have noted, it takes me out of the movie.

hand held shots can be great in a movie or tv show but even i can buy a hand held camcorder for $500 that has a SteadyShot image stabilization feature.


TonyD is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-28-2005, 07:57 PM   #32 of 37
Eddie W.
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Local Time: 05:32 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 147

I'm glad there seems to be a growing backlash against this awful technique. I tried watching the new NBC series 'Medium' and while they don't use the zoom & pan method, the camera is constantly wobbling around like Anna Nicole Smith in a funhouse during an earthquake. Even intimate scenes with Patricia Arquette and her husband in bed talking are filmed with camera bobbing up & down, swaying left to right.

I sometimes get the feeling that this is the cinematic eqivalent of shaking keys at a baby. They seem to be afraid that if everything stops moving for a few seconds, we'll divert our attention elsewhere.
Eddie W. is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-01-2005, 11:01 PM   #33 of 37
Rob Tomlin
Member
 
Location: SoCal
Join Date: Jan 2000
Local Time: 09:32 AM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,893

Quote:
Just imagine Ben-Hur or Lawrence of Arabia ruining some of its big moments by getting in overly tight and jumpy.


NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




I admit that I am tired of this technique as well. I tried watching "24" for the first time, and was disappointed to see that they too are using this technique.




For ordinary men, it's a burning, fiery furnace.

My DVD's My HT
Rob Tomlin is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-02-2005, 07:43 AM   #34 of 37
TonyD
Member
 
Location: where ever my wife lets me
Join Date: Dec 1999
Local Time: 12:32 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 10,151

Send a message via AIM to TonyD View Member's Myspace Profile
rob, i was just coming in to say that if you want to see this technique used to advantage(or well) watch 24.

i dont think it is overused and is just right for the style of the show.

there is no constant zooming in and out or back and forth.
it's there but it doesnt overwelm, the way it does in "bourne".


TonyD is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-02-2005, 11:10 AM   #35 of 37
Malcolm R
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Local Time: 12:32 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,723

Didn't "NYPD Blue" start this unfortunate trend?



That thing's uglier than a chipmunk's behind.
Emerson Cod, Pushing Daisies

My Home Away From Home
Malcolm R is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-02-2005, 01:21 PM   #36 of 37
Rob Tomlin
Member
 
Location: SoCal
Join Date: Jan 2000
Local Time: 09:32 AM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,893

Tony-

I will agree that the method wasn't used constantly on 24, but it was still distracting (to me).




For ordinary men, it's a burning, fiery furnace.

My DVD's My HT
Rob Tomlin is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-02-2005, 02:34 PM   #37 of 37
Rutgar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Local Time: 12:32 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 456

"24" is an example of the "moving/zooming" camera technique being used correctly. Sparingly, and under exagerated.

Bourne is an example of it being over/mis-used.


Rutgar is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Post New Thread  Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.
Total Page Views Since 7/8/2006: 175,669,569 | Page Views Today: 104,426


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

© 1997-2008 PARRON Enterprises, LLC
No part may be copied or reproduced without the
express written permission of the owners of this site.

  
Skin Chooser: