[Rob P S]

James B. gives it quite a spanking:
http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/mo...ut_paddle.html

This will probably tank like Harold & Kumar did. I have no use for Seth Green or Matthew Lilliard movies, but does this look appealing to anybody?

[Rex Bachmann]

Rob PS wrote (post #1):

Quote:

This will probably tank like Harold & Kumar did.

In fact, the producers will be . . . up the creek.

[DaveF]

I've had no interest in the gross-out / sex-out movies of the past several years -- I've not seen There's Something abot Mary or American Pie. But this movie is strangely appealing to me. I may rent it when it comes to video.

[Dan Rudolph]

Harold and Kumar didn't tank. The movie only cost 9 million to make and it's grossed nearly twice that.

[Chris]

Yep.

But this movie is way worse then Harold & Kumar. It's just mentally offensive. I put it in a category slightly above "Freddy Got Fingered"

[Shawn_KE]

Looks amusing.

[Ron-P]

Quote:

...but does this look appealing to anybody?

Not in the least bit. This looks so bad I'll most likely never see it.

[steve frechette]

Did any of you people ripping on it actually see it? I saw it a few weeks back (my theatre has had the print sitting around for awhile now); and it's actually quite funny. THe marketing is TERRIBLE for this film and makes it look completely unfunny and pidgeonholed into the "skip" category. Give it a shot, it's actually quite a fun and funny movie.

[NickSo]

yeah, the diff between Harold and Kumar, and this is that... Harold and Kumar was GOOD...

[Scott Weinberg]

Here's