Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum

Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum Forum Search: 
 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum


 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Entertainment and Media > Movies (Theatrical)
[ HOLLYWOOD/THE MPAA and MOVIEGOERS: The buck MUST stop here! ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 08:11 AM   #1 of 37
Matthew Prince
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Local Time: 10:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 57

I know I've only made a few posts but I'm mad. MAD! I tell ya.

You know what done it? Finding out that the new Alien V Predator movie was a PG-13. A f****n' PG-13! Check here if you don't believe me.

I just thought what the hell is going in Hollywood today? A film that could be a possible franchise based on dark, scary and gory movies has been turned into a desperately teenage friendly movie, designed to catch as many 13 and 14 year old as possible! The people at FOX should be ashamed of themselves!

The same thing happened with King Arthur. The script was written by David Franzoni, who wrote Ridley Scott's Gladiator, which practically revived the swords 'n' sandals epics and I'm sure the film was shot to be more graphic than it was.

Even in an interview, Jerry Bruckheimer promised not to hold back on the gore and sexuality... but lo and behold, the movie is a PG-13 with rumours ALREADY going around that Antoine Fuqua was hinting at doing an R-Rated Director's Cut on DVD. Makes you sick doesn't it?

Every year, but particularly in the Summer it happens, movies that are obviously meant for adults, that deal with sex, violence or strong language are heavily edited for the "kids" or "target demographic".

Damn, what happened to the producers' and directors' vision, where a film was just made, submitted for a rating and whatever it got that was it and it got released! Films with heavy sex, violence and strong language (and those "themes") were R and films without that were PG/PG-13!

Sometimes I look back to the '70s and '80s and think at least we had execs and producers with balls back then!

We had Die Hard, Predator, Commando, Rambo, Lethal Weapon, Apocalypse Now, The Godfather, Wild Bunch, The Shining, A Nightmare On Elm Street, etc... yes, those films may have been of varying quality, but at least the filmmakers believed in giving ADULTS at good night out!

That's why sometimes I thank God I live in England, because we have the BBFC. The British rating board is SO MUCH better than the MPAA it's unreal!

A quick history though. In the late '70s and '80s, a guy called James Ferman was in charge of the BBFC, much like your Jack Valenti, unfortunately, he was very conservative and observed the 'video nasty' craze at the time (cheap and nasty exploitation flicks made quickly and released straight to video, before ratings existed) and blocked a lot of movies from coming out. Controversial movies were heavily cut and others were simply banned. Unusually, he was in charge for 15+ years which is longer than a Director is supposed to be...

After he left in the late 1990s - IMPORTANT - a guy called Andreas Whittam Smith took over and was far more liberal (now Robin Duval is the new Director and he is similar to Mr Smith). Under his reign, many banned and heavily cut movies were re-submitted and PASSED! Among others, The Exorcist, Evil Dead 1 AND 2 were released again alongside the so called 'video nasties' which were let through with only 'minor cuts' than before and all new genre & boundary breaking movies were passed UNCUT like IRREVERSIBLE...

As well as the above the British ratings were relaxed and the 12 and 12A (similar to the PG-13) categories were introduced. They were primarily used for comic-book movies & summer blockbusters so producers & directors could push slightly harder with the action and set pieces for Spider-Man, X-Men, The Hulk, etc...

The MAIN reason why I love the British rating system (and just not because I live here ) is that it follows common sense:

Our U is equal to your 'G'

Our PG is equal to your 'PG'

Our 12 is debatable: over 90% of the time it matches your 'PG-13'... BUT YOUR 'PG-13's can sometimes be slightly too violent and become a...

(Our) 15, which is where you should pay attention. A 15 would match your 'R' because it would most likely have plenty of strong language (f-words, s-words, a LIMITED amount of m-fs and very FEW c-words). 15's are mostly applied to general action movies (The Rock) and thrillers (Spartan, Patriot Games), sex comedies (American Pie movies), martial arts (Mortal Kombat, Romeo Must Die) and strangely enough 'ghetto' movies (Friday). Then there is the 'final' rating...

Our 18, which ALSO matches your 'R'. In James Ferman's days most 18's were cut, but nowadays they are rarely. '18's in the UK are always more graphic adult movies, with more sex, nudity, violence or swearing (your typical '80s movie night out! ) They range from Blade 2 to Battle Royale to Pulp Fiction to Basic Instinct to Sexy Beast to Freddy V Jason to Goodfellas, etc...

Now here is a main point to American moviefans and Hollywood: THERE IS NO SHAME IN AN ADULT ('18') RATING! If a film is given an 18, then so be it! In England, 18-year-olds and above go to the movie theatre/cinema and just watch it! The film doesn't suffer from a stigma around an 'adult' rating, that's just the audience it's intended for! The Hollywood producers AND execs need to get a grip on this 'NC-17' nonsense!

"Oh, our movie got an NC-17, that means we can't get the teenage audience we want!" Boo-hoo! (Teenagers make up to the majority of the moviegoing 'demographic - any movie they go (or their parents take them) to = $$$$$!)

Even around Europe people respect and understand their country's movie ratings systems and it's no suprise that producers normally release 'International Extended/Uncut' versions over here...

And because of all this and the advent of DVD, it means that (studios want?) producers and/or directors frequently choose to submit and release a PG-13 OR light 'R' rated movie at the movie theatre/cinema and then IN ADVANCE announce that they will release a 'hard R' or 'Unrated' version on DVD. Is that spineless, or what? Unsurprisingly, the extra versions always have only small changes to the movie...

I wonder how many more movies will be released on DVD this year and next as 'Director's Cuts', 'Unrated' or 'The Parts You Could Never See!' (sound familiar?)...

Until the Hollywood big heads come clean, the MPAA applies some common sense and the Studios, Producers & Directors stop being so cowardly, WE should all view ANY big-budget/big-star movie with sceptism...

End of rant...
Matthew Prince is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 09:47 AM   #2 of 37
Peter Apruzzese
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Local Time: 05:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 2,814

Quote:
Until the Hollywood big heads come clean, the MPAA applies some common sense and the Studios, Producers & Directors stop being so cowardly, WE should all view ANY big-budget/big-star movie with sceptism...
What you should do is to stop seeing the junk Hollywood puts out - their major motivation is money. Deny them money and you *might* change their attitudes. Not likely, but at least you'll feel better about not supporting their dim-witted films.



Movies the way they were meant to be seen: Big Screen Classics at the Lafayette Theatre
Peter Apruzzese is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 09:55 AM   #3 of 37
Chris
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Local Time: 05:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 20,941

Send a message via ICQ to Chris Send a message via Yahoo to Chris
Eh. I actually kind of like the trend.. and their box office tends to show it to.. the big blockbusters have all been PG/G lately.. Nemo, Shrek2, SpiderMan, X-Men.. what the movie audience pays for is what they get. As long as their are major blockbusters that are PG/PG-13, and R rated movies don't become blockbusters, you'll see more PG-13 flicks.

I've never really found that it hurt the work, either.. good films can be done at PG-13; I didn't find the need for any graphic sex or bloody violence in XMen, SpiderMan, or ever Bourne Supremacy. All were good as they were.

Some films do need it (Pulp Fiction) and we have an audience for that as well. But it's no joke, studios will put out more PG/PG-13 films in an effort to get a bigger audience. Can't really blame them... the buck isn't stopping here, it's still going straight to the studio for flicks I like, no matter what the rating



My Current DVD-Profiler


"I've been Ostrafied!" - Christopher, Sopranos 5/6/07
Chris is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 09:57 AM   #4 of 37
Steve_Tk
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Local Time: 04:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 2,104

It is a shame. Why even make any movies R rated anymore?
Steve_Tk is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 10:04 AM   #5 of 37
Richard Kim
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Local Time: 06:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 5,018

Wow, who knew that slime would bump a film's rating to PG-13?
Richard Kim is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 11:13 AM   #6 of 37
Magnus T
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 11:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 704

I hate the trend too. I remember a time when R - rated action films were a dime a dozen. I miss those times. Alien VS Predator is an excellent example of a studio not having the balls to release a film based on a franchise that is OBVIOUSLY for adults.

The studios are always underestimating the audience. They think they make more money by dumbing down films and making the more accessible, when, in fact the opposite is true (anyone remember the first Matrix?). Donnie Darko is good example of a film that was never given a chance by the studio during it's theatrical run, but has since become the biggest cult movie in the last 10 - 15 years. So big in fact that it was re - released 3 years later in theaters.

The biggest problem is that the Hollywood machine have all become cowards. They refuse to take a chance... on anything! And we're now seeing the results. Tons of movies over the last couple of years that has had huge budgets have failed miserably.

Regardless of what Hollywood thinks, AUDIENCES WANT TO BE CHALLANGED!
Magnus T is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 11:49 AM   #7 of 37
Chris
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Local Time: 05:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 20,941

Send a message via ICQ to Chris Send a message via Yahoo to Chris
Quote:
Regardless of what Hollywood thinks, AUDIENCES WANT TO BE CHALLANGED!

I'm not sure where we get "mentally challenged" = "R" rating.

Some of the greatest films of all time have not been "R", and some of the films that have truly been "intelligent" and "well thought out" were not "R". It's based far more on the script then gore, etc.

2001 was a great film; etc. Pulp Fiction was also a great film

I think there is something amiss with equivocating "R" to having any meaning other then "R" or giving it more weight then a "PG-13" by immediately dismissing a film. Some of the greatest action films of all time were not "R". Indiana Jones was not "R", Star Wars was not "R", Lord of the Rings was not "R".

Studios are like anything else, they are profit machines. Donnie Darko never got a chance for multiple reasons, but in comparison, even through second runs, it's not a breakout blockbuster. It is a great cult film, in the same sense that Priscilla, Queen of the Desert is.

Look, I'll admit, I've been very on the other side, I find a lot of trouble with the fact that Hollywood is releasing fewer and fewer "G" rated films. Even many animated films have to make jabs, etc. that I don't necessarily want to take my kids to and end up "PG".

Studios have the same responsibility as any other company.. to their bottom line. And the bottom line tells them that if you want to crack a couple hundred million, it's not "R".. but the market is still there.. see Kill Bill Vol.2.

The goal is to tell the story as you want to tell it. Hollywood still releases plenty of "R" films. But you're right, the films that sell tickets aren't those, and so the studios have adjusted. Blame the moviegower as much as Hollywood.

As to "Challenged" there are plenty of truly challenging films out there this year, one of the best being "The Story of the Weeping Camel" which I believe is PG, and another "Super Size Me" which unrated would still likely be PG.



My Current DVD-Profiler


"I've been Ostrafied!" - Christopher, Sopranos 5/6/07
Chris is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 12:14 PM   #8 of 37
Magnus T
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 11:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 704

Chris, I agree completely. There has indeed been MANY great G and PG rated films. My point is that the studios as of late are not just lowering the rating of films, they are also lowering the intelligence of the film, you know, lowest common denominator and so forth.

By the way, Super Size Me is an independent film, we're talking big studio films here.
Magnus T is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 08-01-2004, 01:07 PM   #9 of 37
Holadem
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Local Time: 06:13 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 8,897

Quote:
Donnie Darko is good example of a film that was never given a chance by the studio during it's theatrical run, but has since become the biggest cult movie in the last 10 - 15 years.
Huh?

--
H



Holadem is offline Quote this post in a PM