|
|
 |
05-19-2004, 03:46 AM
|
#1 of 15
|
|
Crawdaddy
Administrator
Location: Michigan
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 04:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 18,319
|
This thread is now the Official Review Thread for "Shrek 2". Please post all HTF member reviews in this thread.
Any other comments, links to other reviews, or discussion items will be deleted from this thread without warning!
If you need to discuss those type of issues then I have designated an Official Discussion Thread.
Crawdaddy
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
|
|
|
05-19-2004, 09:58 AM
|
#2 of 15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Local Time: 01:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,031
|
This is, without doubt, the best movie I've seen so far in 2004, no contest.
Between the very good storytelling (almost as good as the original!), superb animation, GREAT new characters, and so many parodies that you either need to see the movie at least three times and/or eventually get the DVD to see it all, I enjoyed the movie from almost the beginning to the end!
Two characters I really liked are Puss'n'Boots (perfectly voiced by Antonio Banderas--and I really mean it!) and the Fairy Godmother as voiced by Jennifer Saunders of Absolutely Fabulous fame--just perfect for this movie, to say the least.
By the way, this movie definitely parodies Beauty and the Beast (the Disney animated feature) brilliantly, especially if you've seen the Special Edition.
 out of 
Raymond in Sacramento, CA USA
|
|
|
05-19-2004, 07:10 PM
|
#3 of 15
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Local Time: 04:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 38,686
|
You'll walk out of the theater with a big smile on your face. After a beginning segment paced a little slow (and intentionally awkward), once the film kicks into another gear, it never lets up on the fun and the homages. I liked how they integrated the homages to push the story forward.
Pus-n-boots (Antonio Banderas) was so funny to me, he pretty much stole every scene he was in. The rest of the cast chimed in when needed and added to a fun viewing experience.
I give it 3.75 stars, or a grade of A-.
|
|
|
 |
 |
05-20-2004, 01:31 PM
|
#4 of 15
|
|
Member
Location: St. Louis, MO
Join Date: Feb 2000
Local Time: 09:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 10,460
|
While an improvement over the original, if only because there's slightly less Shrek, the most unlikeable star of a mainstream animated movie in recent memory, (how many hours of ogre angst are we going to be subjected to?) the movie is still weighed down by its premise of apeing fairy tale structure. The creators use zero imagination in the telling, only in how many oh so clever fake product placements and references can be squeezed into the running time.
The film would be a dull sit if not for the presence of Eddie Murphy's donkey character, who carries this movie on his furry back even more than he did the original. Virtually all the laughs are his lines after the enormously promising but quickly disappointing debut of Puss 'n Boots. Puss, while not given "The Bob Barker Treatment" physically, receives it from the writers who turn a great idea into just another supporting character.
I laughed more than I make it sound like I did, but the final straw is the movie's atrocious soundtrack. Wasn't the shelf life of "La Vida Loca" up at least three years ago? And yet it's a centerpiece tune here.
C+ w/ a B+/A- for Murphy and a C- for all the rest.
Yes, Captain Hammer's here, hair blowing in the breeze. The day needs my saving expertise! - Captain Hammer, Corporate Tool
2002 Sight & Sound Challenge: 314 Last Watched: An Autumn Afternoon
Last 10 Films Watched:
Mon Oncle Antoine - B / Late Autumn - A-
Paranoid Park - B / An Autumn Afternoon - A
Forgetting Sarah Marshall - B / Run, Fatboy, Run - B
Get Smart - C- / Rendition - B-
Springtime in a Small Town - B+ / Evan Almighty - C
DVD BEAVER My Collection
|
|
|
 |
 |
05-21-2004, 04:51 PM
|
#5 of 15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Local Time: 09:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,333
|
My wife and I saw this last night and had the best time! Of course your enjoyment factor goes up exponentially depending on how many movie references and in jokes you catch....
|
|
|
05-22-2004, 12:59 PM
|
#6 of 15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 04:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,555
|
Shrek 2 is a hilarious Scary Movie of animation (Scary Movie series is not funny at all) but it is basically a recycle of the original Shrek.
Shrek, 2 (B, 75) [Shrek, B+/A-, 89/90]
[Yeah, yeah, yeah I expected Shrek 2 (& filmmakers behind Shrek franchise) to be like what Tarantino had done to Kill Bill 2/s or at least for it to have the same virtuosity and inventiveness of Babe: Pig in the City and Toy Story 2 (though they are not as great as The Triplets of Belleville, Finding Nemo, Spirited Away and Grave of the Fireflies, they are more daring and arguably, a step-up or even better than their originals)]
|
|
|
05-23-2004, 02:07 AM
|
#7 of 15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Local Time: 04:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,803
|
A very enjoyable and funny film, but it seemed to be lacking the heart of the original.
Good: Puss N' Boots
Fairy Godmother
The colors were brilliant
Better animation than the original
Bad: Thin Plot
Shrek was more of a supporting character
The whole marital problems issue seems slightly out of
place here.
Overall: ***/****
Original Shrek: ***1/2/****
|
|
|
 |
 |
05-23-2004, 04:03 AM
|
#8 of 15
|
|
Adam_S
Member
Location: Marina del Rey, CA
Join Date: Feb 2001
Local Time: 01:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,060
|
  (out of four) - great movie
Shrek 2 isn't as good as the first, but that's because it's trying to hard to imitate the first. The moments when the film gets to cut loose and build on the original spirit of the first are the best moments, the moments when they're deliberately trying to imitate the great moments of the first are the most annoying moments. The first of these really occurs in the opening montage, both the little mermaid reference was a bit forced (though funny in the middle of the from here to eternity reference) and especially annoying was the fiona kicks ass moment in the montage. The numerous times sad songs intrude seem to be a pale imitation of Shrek's Hallelujah sequence (which in my opinion is the best non pixar american animation sequence since Iron Giant and one that is comparable to the best moments of the great Disney films and for me is what elevated the film to four stars).
There are a handful of plot inconsistencies such as what happened to dragon when donkey took the potion and how the pals got to the jail so fast (my guess is that a sequence with dragon taking them was dropped for the middle end credits sequence gag).
Also I've been annoyed since seeing the previews that Donkey is a white stallion. What the F is up with that? why not a black stallion, they could even work in a lot of fun jokes that way. I guess the problem is that our culture subconsciously equates white with beauty, success, purity, desirability etc and so we get it as those representations. Since Donkey is essentially an updated Stepinfetchit character/sidekick, I suppose it seems natural for hollywood writers to have him want to be white as his greatest desire. 
BUT, the goods tend to outweigh the bad, the film is almost always as sly and clever as the original was, sometimes it obvious sometimes not, thankfully the phallic jokes are absent, but there's a lot more bodily function humor. What's more is that we already like or love these characters and it's a delight to join them in yet another story, even if the story isn't all that original it is still, ultimately, very fun and definitely enjoyable. I would watch this again, and I will when it comes to DVD.
I think David Poland hit this on the head by saying it takes the "Leathal Weapon" sequel route. but I was disapointed that PussnBoots was never playing a double game--and how on earth did the filmmakers miss an oppurtunity to reference the Princess Bride in his 'debt-repayment' scene?
Adam
|
|
|
 |
 |
05-23-2004, 03:41 PM
|
#9 of 15
|
|
Neil Joseph
Administrator
Location: 43.4ΊN 79.2ΊW
Join Date: Jan 1998
Local Time: 04:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 15,519
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
05-24-2004, 01:12 AM
|
#10 of 15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Local Time: 02:09 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,266
|
Shrek 2 lacks the forward momentum of its original predecessor but is still a worthy follow up to the original. The sequel works using the same elements as its predecessor parodies, lampoons, satire and the recurring jabs at Disney. The three main characters - Shrek, Donkey and Princess Fiona, are back along with some fairy tale creatures from the original and the introduction of some new ones.
The most talked about addition to the cast of characters is Puss In Boots played by Antonio Banderas. Puss makes quite a grand entrance to the proceedings but is quickly de-clawed after just a few minutes onscreen. Thats too bad because they could have done a lot more with this character rather than becoming just another sidekick and singing Livin' La Vida Roca.
Jennifer Saunders as the Fairy Godmother is the one that actually adds some spice to the entire picture. Her character and contribution is key to the sustainability of this outing.
The animation is well done with some vibrant colors and additional emphasis to background detail. However, as to the music, the original is better able to weave previously released musical material to its storyline.
Shrek 2 contains a lot of jokes that will surely be missed the first time around. Repeat viewings will be needed to fully digest all of the referenced jokes. The film is also the latest from DreamWorks Animation (DWA) sporting a brand new logo and introduction (that I have seen). DWA recently had Wall Street abuzz about a possible initial public offering to rival Pixar Studios. But in order for DreamWorks to beat Pixar in the computer animated film arena, it will have to be more creative in its total work product along with some very original storytelling.
~Edwin
| |