|
|
 |
04-07-2004, 12:05 AM
|
#1 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 09:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 505
|
I have read several articles to the effect that this movie is a complete re-write of the history of the Alamo, incorporating Disney concocted political correctness, as well as damaging the reputation of the main characters ie Davy Crockett, Sam Houston, Jim Bowie, etc. I won't be wasting my money on this flick, either in the theater or on dvd.
|
|
|
04-07-2004, 04:44 PM
|
#2 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Local Time: 09:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 84
|
Well I saw it last night and really enjoyed it. A lot better than I expected. Billy Bob, Quaid, Jason Patrick and Patrick Wilson were all great. I didn't get the sense of any political correctness - I thought the film did a great job of depicting the horrors and realities of war.
|
|
|
 |
 |
04-07-2004, 05:49 PM
|
#3 of 26
|
|
Member
Location: Katy, TX
Join Date: Aug 1999
Local Time: 03:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
|
I have read several articles to the effect that this movie is a complete re-write of the history of the Alamo, incorporating Disney concocted political correctness, as well as damaging the reputation of the main characters ie Davy Crockett, Sam Houston, Jim Bowie, etc.
|
MUCH ABOUT HISTORY
Alamo movie filled with 'fairy tales'
Group says new film destroys memory of American heroes
Posted: April 6, 2004
10:30 p.m. Eastern
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
A new movie set to open this weekend entitled "The Alamo" is filled with revisionist history and political correctness, claims a pro-military nonprofit organization.

Billy Bob Thornton stars in 'The Alamo' (Touchstone Pictures)
In a statement, Freedom Alliance slammed Michael Eisner and Walt Disney Pictures, the film's maker, for rewriting history in the movie, which is scheduled to open April 9.
"The movie reads more like a Disney fairy tale and promotes a politically correct revisionist agenda aimed at destroying a traditional American hero," said B. Forrest Clayton, a Freedom Alliance visiting fellow.
Clayton says he obtained a screenplay of the film and found it to be "full of inaccuracies." He says Davy Crockett is portrayed as a "frightened wanderer" who wanted to escape "over the wall" in the dark of night during the historic battle, but felt paralyzed and trapped by his own underserved heroic reputation.
An unofficial website for the film calls it "a tale of a handful of men who stood up for their passion and ideals against an overwhelming force.
"In the spring of 1836, in the face of insurmountable odds, fewer than 200 ordinary men who believed in the future of Texas held the fort for 13 days against thousands of Mexican soldiers led by dictator Gen. Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna."
Freedom Alliance says the film has Crockett captured, bound and executed on his knees after the battle was over, "even though the historical evidence shows that he was killed fighting, in the thick of combat, during the battle."

1955 comic book: Fess Parker in Walt Disney's Davy Crockett at the Alamo
The group cites several historical witnesses who backed up the story of a heroic Crockett.
Said the group's statement: "The movie makers ignored these witnesses that corroborated Crockett's heroic death in combat and based his capture and execution in the film on a suspect portion of Jose Enrique De La Pena's supposed diary/memoir which handwriting expert Charles Hamilton proved was a forgery by John Laflin, aka John Lafitte, a prominent American forger of papers on American pirates and frontier heroes."
Disney also is criticized for portraying Gen. Sam Houston as a "venereal-diseased drunkard" and Col. William Barret Travis, commander of Texan forces at the Alamo, as a "deadbeat dad and serial adulterer."
In addition, says the group, Col. James Bowie, the Alamo defender famous for his knife-fighting skills, is portrayed as a land-swindling slave trader. The film reportedly has Crockett participating in a My Lai-style massacre in the Creek Indian War.
Freedom Alliance says in contrast, Manuel Castrillon, a Mexican general who attacked the Alamo, is portrayed as a "flawless, noble and brave hero."
"Heroes such as Davy Crockett must be vigorously defended by all patriotic Americans in the culture war. They represent Western culture. To sit back and allow them to be desecrated is an injustice to American students and a recipe for disaster for the future of the country," concluded Clayton.
A recent Variety article confirmed the film's perspective.
"'Alamo' is expected to deal with many of the historical complexities – including the Mexican point of view – that were glossed over in John Wayne's 1960 film," Variety reported. "Alamo heroes William Barret Travis' serial marital infidelities, Jim Bowie's slave trading and Davy Crockett's overall political incorrectness will also be addressed."
Richard Bruce Winders, curator of the Alamo museum, said moviegoers who expect a close remake of the John Wayne "Alamo" film will be disappointed. He says the new movie is more accurate and calls the 1960 classic film "real bad history."
"It's hard to believe that Hollywood would do a movie where there was so much historical information in it," he told the Associated Press. "If you're expecting a remake of John Wayne's movie, you're going to be pretty much surprised by what you'll see."
The movie is directed by John Lee Hancock. It stars Billy Bob Thornton, Dennis Quaid, Emilio Echevarría, Patrick Wilson and Jason Patric.
|
|
|
 |
 |
04-07-2004, 05:49 PM
|
#4 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Local Time: 04:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 157
|
I would agree with Jasmine-I was very impressed with the cast-Patrick Wilson from Angels in America and Billy Bob (Davy Crockett) were my personal favorites. It had a lot of depictions from the mexican side as well-which I thought was interesting and important to depict in the film. Additionally-the scenes of the sets were fantastic-and overall I thought the movie was a realistic look at war-with savageness and the poor conditions and also did a great job with the action even though it was PG 13.
If anyone has any questions-please ask away!
Link deleted by moderator; DO NOT REPOST.
|
|
|
04-08-2004, 03:50 PM
|
#5 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Local Time: 04:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,042
|
At Rotten Tomatoes the negative reviews are starting to come in (12 out of 14 are negative). I'm not really surprised since this is probably the main reason it was delayed.
I still plan on seeing it because I like historical films.
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 12:33 AM
|
#6 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 09:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 505
|
"I still plan on seeing it because I like historical films."
Historical? Better watch it with tongue in cheek!
|
|
|
 |
 |
04-09-2004, 12:56 AM
|
#7 of 26
|
|
Thomas
Member
Location: Columbus, OH
Join Date: Dec 2001
Local Time: 04:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,361
|
Larry, the article that Wayne posted at the top of the page seems much more biased against Eisner and Disney than The Alamo, and it seems like that may be the case for at least one of the articles you read as well. The article stated that the criticisms come from reading a screenplay of the movie, not the movie itself. The screenplay could have been a rough draft that went through revisions to make it more accurate. How about watching the movie instead of letting other people, who haven't even seen the final cut, form your opinion?
Quote:
|
Disney also is criticized for portraying Gen. Sam Houston as a "venereal-diseased drunkard" and Col. William Barret Travis, commander of Texan forces at the Alamo, as a "deadbeat dad and serial adulterer."
|
I don't know about the VD part, but according to this (go to the bottom of the page), Houston had a drinking problem. As for Travis, this and this states that he left his pregnant wife and son in 1831 to pursue a life in Texas, where he went around the block a number of times.
The man I loved - the man who vanished - he never came back at all. But maybe he's still out there, somewhere. Maybe some day, when Gotham no longer needs Batman, I'll see him again.
|
|
|
 |
 |
04-09-2004, 10:18 AM
|
#8 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Local Time: 03:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 10
|
I saw a preview on Wednesday night. This movie is a "Must Miss."
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 11:51 AM
|
#9 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Local Time: 09:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 84
|
I would definitely agree that the action was great for a PG-13 rating. The final battle was very powerful. It really brought the whole movie home for me.
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 12:20 PM
|
#10 of 26
|
|
Member
Location: Star Lake, NY
Join Date: Mar 2003
Local Time: 04:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 228
|
As for Crockett being executed and not fighting to the death, there was a Discovery Channel show of "Unsolved History" that claimed that Santa Anna's #2 guy wrote a diary in prison that, Crockett was brought to Santa Anna who had him executed like a common criminal. I'm not an Alamo scholar but who else other than the Mexicans could have saw this happen and survive? And in the end does it matter how he died?
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 02:51 PM
|
#11 of 26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Local Time: 01:08 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,211
|
Quote:
|
I'm not an Alamo scholar but who else other than the Mexicans could have saw this happen and survive? And in the end does it matter how he died?
|
Good point. It reminds me of when Pearl Harbor came out people wanted to make a big deal out of whether or not kids were playing baseball and if women were washing clothes. 
 ...When you eliminate the impossible whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth
| |