Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Live Search: 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum




 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Entertainment and Media > Movies (Theatrical)
[ Good cinematography and pretty landscapes - any difference? ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 01:30 PM   #1 of 8
Patrick Sun
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Local Time: 04:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 38,686

Good cinematography and pretty landscapes - any difference?


Sometimes I get the feeling that people confuse pretty landscapes in a film with good cinematography, anyone else feel this way?



"I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar!"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Dragon Con 2008
Patrick Sun is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 01:34 PM   #2 of 8
Kami
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Local Time: 09:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,127

Not really, because landscape photography is actually pretty difficult. Just ask any photographer. It's not as easy as it looks. Even harder when shooting film/video IMO. Of course I am thinking from a TECHNICAL standpoint, there's only so many ways you can compose a big wide landscape shot.
Kami is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 01:38 PM   #3 of 8
MatthewA
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Local Time: 04:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,044

I've seen bad or mediocre cinematography of nice scenery, and good cinematography of rather dreary scenery. The main things I look for in cinematography are use of color or grayscale, depth of field, and composition in regards to aspect ratio.



STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!

My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray
MatthewA is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 02:05 PM   #4 of 8
Kami
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Local Time: 09:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,127

Re: Matthew's post...

Some good cinematography with dreary scenery would be Sleepy Hollow. I love the look of that film.
Kami is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 02:10 PM   #5 of 8
StevenA
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Local Time: 09:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 1,314

I always thought Out Of Africa's Best Cinematography Oscar was more for the scenery than for especially outstanding work from the DP (especially as the DP who won the award didn't shooot the aerial shots).
StevenA is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 02:49 PM   #6 of 8
Sean Moon
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Local Time: 04:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,211

Send a message via AIM to Sean Moon
Cinematography is all about use of color, lighting, and composition to me. Sleepy Hollow is a good example as mentioned above. Royal Tenenbaums has wonderful cinematography to me, and thats almost all interiors for that film, but the colors and coposition of hte frame is just breathtaking.



http://doctordoom.blogspot.com

We must stand in awe of the infinite capacity of the human mind to reject the introduction of useful knowledge.
Sean Moon is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 04:00 PM   #7 of 8
Chad R
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Local Time: 04:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,341

Whereas both outdoor (landscape) and indoor cinematography are difficult in their own regards, far too much weight is placed on the landscapes, usually at the sake of indoor work. When it comes to awards season, outdoor work consistently garners more praise than does indoor.

It's like the showy performances where an actor is called upon to cry or otherwise highly emote where a more inward, controlled performance is passed over (think some of the remarkable work done by Morgan Freeman). Both are difficult in their own regards, but awards typically go to those characters whose emotions are out there for the world instead of those whose emotions are bottled up.

The same is true for cinematography. The pretty landscapes usually take the edge over the moodier indoor or studio work. One simply needs the beauty captured on film (a difficult task as has been mentioned) and the other needs everything (light, shadow, color) created. One isn't really any better than the other so long as they serve the scene well, but the landscapes tend to get the accolades.
Chad R is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 12-30-2003, 04:55 PM   #8 of 8
Nathan V
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Local Time: 02:05 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 977

Cinematography is much, much more than pointing a camera at something pretty (a landscape, for instance). You're right, it is too often confused with beautiful imagery. It's HOW the dp shoots it, not WHAT he shoots. Cinematography is about composition, choice of angles, use of grain, lighting technique, choice of film stock, filters, and developing technique (bleach bypass, saturation, etc), among other things. Watch 'The Man Who Wasn't There,' dp'd by Roger Deakins, for examples of great cinematography. The film has no landscapes. Other well-shot non-landscape movies include Fight Club, Casino, and JFK, among others.



Body of Lies / Ridley Scott / Leo DiCaprio / Russell Crowe / Autumn '08
Nathan V is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Post New Thread  Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.
Total Page Views Since 7/8/2006: 175,727,605 | Page Views Today: 162,462


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

© 1997-2008 PARRON Enterprises, LLC
No part may be copied or reproduced without the
express written permission of the owners of this site.

  
Skin Chooser: