Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum

Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum Forum Search: 
 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum


 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors


Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-06-2005, 12:00 PM   #1 of 5
Austin R
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Local Time: 10:52 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 12

16:9 or 1.85:1(widescreen)?


I am planning my home theater and have originally thought of putting in a 16:9 screen, but am now wondering if 1.85:1 would be better for my environment. I would rather give preference in presentation to DVD movies(or other digital formats) rather than TV. Does that mean I should choose a widescreen format or what other things should I be considering?

thanks!

Austin
Austin R is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-06-2005, 12:44 PM   #2 of 5
Leo Kerr
Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Local Time: 12:52 PM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 1,569

Point 1 in your consideration: Go to a common denominator:

1.33:1 - Television
1.37:1 - SMPTE/Academy Silent Full Aperature
1.66:1 - so-called 'European' wide-screen, also commonly used by Disney Animation
1.77:1 - HDTV aspect (also called 16:9)
1.85:1 - North American spherical wide-screen
2:1 - common shoe-box compromise screen aspect
2.35:1 - Commonly quoted, but often refers to 2.39:1 and 2.4:1 aspect, anamorphic wide-screen (aka Cinemascope.)

Those are the common formats floating around. Yes, you do occassionally get the odd-balls - the super-ultra-magna-MGM-Pana-Scopes(tm) with the 3.2:1 aspect ratios, or some of the really funky Russian 3-D formats that are pretty close to 1:1 (actually, I think they're .9:1 - narrower than they are tall, but I said they were funky.)

Anyway, back to the original point, there's a lot of stuff in the 1.66:1 - 1.85:1 range. How much would it hurt you to go to a minimum aspect of 1.85:1? I don't really know. Individually, the steps between 1.66 and 1.77, and then 1.77 to 1.85 are fairly small, but if you look at the difference between 1.66 and 1.85, well, now we're looking at real differences!

Another point is, often, projectors have a 4:3-shrink mode, that'll reduce the 4:3 area into something that'll fit (pillarboxed) into the 16:9 frame. Except with your 1.85:1 screen, it'd be artifically letterboxed on top of that, too.

In case you're wondering, I'm not really trying to be helpful - I don't know what helpful is in this case.

Leo
Leo Kerr is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-12-2005, 11:09 AM   #3 of 5
RickGagne
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Local Time: 08:52 AM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 1

I went with a 16x9 specifically because there are so many formats out there and I find it's the best compromise. HDTV is spectacular and is in that format. When there are more movies on PPV in HDTV I can see ordering those instead of going to the video store because until blu-ray or the other HD DVD's come out they offer better PQ.
Also the new PJ's now do a very good job of renedering the bars to almost black. The bars are simply not as anoying as they used to be.

Another option for you might be a masking screen, but those are quite costly.
RickGagne is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-12-2005, 09:33 PM   #4 of 5
Jack Ferry
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Local Time: 12:52 PM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 220

Quote:
Another option for you might be a masking screen, but those are quite costly.


I made some pretty decent masking using $3 worth of black fabric and some velcro.
Jack Ferry is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-14-2005, 10:51 AM   #5 of 5
Greg_Hammond
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Local Time: 04:52 PM
Local Date: 10-07-2008
Posts: 37

Personally, I'm glad I went with a 4:3 aspect ratio. I tend to watch a good bit of DirecTV on my projector, and find that the black bars across the top/bottom with 1.66:1 and 1.85:1 aren't bad at all. On extreme widescreen 2.35:1, I've considered making black painted 1/4" plywood masks and hanging them when needed, but honestly - it's not that bad with a 400:1 contrast projector and a grey screen today.

Greg
Greg_Hammond is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Post New Thread  Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.
Total Page Views Since 7/8/2006: 165,283,077 | Page Views Today: 99,191


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

© 1997-2008 PARRON Enterprises, LLC
No part may be copied or reproduced without the
express written permission of the owners of this site.

  
Skin Chooser: 
Forums Directory