I want to ask a question here, as my thread was maybe too specific. I'm in the same boat.
I want to spend the money it takes to get to "90%" performance, in other words, right at the point of the curve where you start to get to the law of diminishing returns. I want good cables made on scientific principase, but I'm not interested in paying any extra for voodoo magic.
I am currently looking at using interconnects made from (more than likely) RG-6/U coax cable.
Chu pointed me in the direction of Beldin's site, and I actually saw a reference elsewhere on the web from a ham radio guy talking (in very detailed terms, mind you) about cable used for antenna applications. RG-59/U is good, then RG-6/U is better, then he actually gosh darn said that Beldin is a level up from "regular" RG-6/U.
And then there is mylar foil shielding, and Cu braid shielding, and sometimes more than one layer of Cu braiding.
And from some other thread here, I got pointed in the direction of Vince's cables:
http://cables.musicianassist.com//about.htm
So that's where I'm at right now. (I've heard good things in the past about Canare component cables.) Does that sound like a plan?
Looking for analog cables from SACD/DVD-A player to pre/pro, and then from pre/pro to the amps.
And then, maybe a stupid question: is there any reason why you'd want to, or *not* want to, use coax for speaker cables too? I just really like the idea of the built-in resistance to EMI/RF interference that coax cable has.
Chu? Brian? Sanjay? Others?
THANKS!!