|
|
 |
 |
 |
09-05-2008, 07:04 AM
|
#1 of 30
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 159
|
Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
I don't want to be overly rancorous in addressing this, but the lamentable trend of Warner Bros. giving certain Blu-ray releases lossy DD5.1 audio instead of the lossless treatment continues to disappoint me. We've already gone through this with "Speed Racer", which either (a) didn't make enough money at the box office to "deserve" lossless audio, or (b) doesn't need lossless audio because it's a "kids movie," whatever that inexplicable logic means. (It reminds me of Disney's marketing MAR-ed live-action releases as being presented in "family friendly widescreen," as if thick black bars was a leading cause for broken homes in this country.)
So now we have another announced release from Warners, "Kit Kittredge: An American Girl," with Abigail Breslin, Stanley Tucci, et al. I never got around to seeing it in theaters, but it did pretty well with critics (79% on RT), and it looks like a nice rental. It had fairly modest box office, about $17M, but with a reported budget of only $10M, this is hardly the financial catastrophe for WB that "Speed Racer" was.
Well, you can probably guess what's coming next . . . here's the back cover art for the Blu-ray release of "Kit Kittredge":
Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
No extras (granted, there may not have been the budget to produce any), and lossy DD5.1 audio. This is not exactly an unprofitable movie for Warners (at least, after DVD sales/rentals, it won't be), so what's going on? Is lossless audio somehow not "family friendly"? What decision rubric is being applied here? Apparently blockbuster family hits like "Harry Potter" get lossless. But something like "Iron Giant," if and when it comes to Blu-ray, probably won't.
I just don't get it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
09-05-2008, 09:27 AM
|
#2 of 30
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 8
|
Re: Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
I think the issue here is may be which disc type is being used: single layer of 25 GB or dual-layer of 50 GB. A single layer Blu-Ray disc is cheaper and probably easier to produce than a dual-layer (and I seem to recall an issue with reliability of yields for DL discs early on), but has less capacity than an HD-DVD, which may explain why it sounds like some Universal BR reissues of HD-DVD titles actually required applying more DNR and/or compression to fit this time around. And this would mean less space available for a lossless audio track. I would assume non "A"-list releases would not go the dual-layer route but might also be sold for a bit less retail as a result?
Howard
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 09:36 AM
|
#3 of 30
|
|
Michael Reuben
Administrator
Location: New York City, Lehman Bros. was here
Join Date: Feb 1998
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 19,771
|
Re: Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bryan Beckman
Well, you can probably guess what's coming next . . . here's the back cover art for the Blu-ray release of "Kit Kittredge":
Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
|
As I recall, some of the early materials for Speed Racer promised lossless audio. The lesson should be obvious: Don't rely too much on initial PR releases.
M.
"Most people never have to face the fact that, at the right time and the right place, they're capable of anything." -- Chinatown
"What kind of movies would there be if everyone in them had to do what we thought they should do?" -- Roger Ebert
HTF Beginner's Primer and FAQ
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 10:14 AM
|
#4 of 30
|
|
Member
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Join Date: Mar 2004
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 680
|
Re: Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
My answer to the title of this thread is "all of them". Even if the movie was a poor box office performer or an older catalog title with a mono soundtrack, all titles deserve to have lossless audio on Blu-ray. It just doesn't make sense why any studio would go not include lossless audio.
Even the budget Blu-ray releases from Echo Bridge have lossless and they are on BD25s, too.
Last edited by Rhoq : 09-05-2008 at 10:19 AM.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 10:19 AM
|
#5 of 30
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 159
|
Re: Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
Yes, the early press materials for "Speed Racer" featured the Dolby TrueHD logo, but the back cover art said Dolby Digital 5.1. (I'm crossing my fingers for the actual BD review, but I'm not getting my hopes up too high that the back cover spec is incorrect.) The site I linked to for "Kit Kittredge" features the back cover art, which is where I got my info. While they don't have perfect reliability, cover art specs are much less subject to change than early press releases.
|
|
|
 |
 |
09-05-2008, 01:47 PM
|
#6 of 30
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 12:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 3,194
|
I remember all this from '06! vvv
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Howard Tom
I think the issue here is may be which disc type is being used: single layer of 25 GB or dual-layer of 50 GB. A single layer Blu-Ray disc is cheaper and probably easier to produce than a dual-layer (and I seem to recall an issue with reliability of yields for DL discs early on), but has less capacity than an HD-DVD, which may explain why it sounds like some Universal BR reissues of HD-DVD titles actually required applying more DNR and/or compression to fit this time around. And this would mean less space available for a lossless audio track. I would assume non "A"-list releases would not go the dual-layer route but might also be sold for a bit less retail as a result?
Howard
|
Sacrilege!
(JJ)
EDitEDbyED:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rhoq
My answer to the title of this thread is "all of them". Even if the movie was a poor box office performer or an older catalog title with a mono soundtrack, all titles deserve to have lossless audio on Blu-ray. It just doesn't make sense why any studio would go not include lossless audio.
Even the budget Blu-ray releases from Echo Bridge have lossless and they are on BD25s, too.
|
Hooray!!!
I so glad someone else feels its not HiDef w/o HiDef sound.
Man & I've gone even crazier than that; I'm now addicted to LPCM soundtracks! =-I
(something I didn't EVEN care about at 1st, as I was OK w/lossless, now its uncompressed BABY!!!)
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
Last edited by Ed St. Clair : 09-05-2008 at 01:55 PM.
|
|
|
 |
 |
09-05-2008, 02:53 PM
|
#7 of 30
|
|
Michael Reuben
Administrator
Location: New York City, Lehman Bros. was here
Join Date: Feb 1998
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 19,771
|
Re: I remember all this from '06! vvv
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
Man & I've gone even crazier than that; I'm now addicted to LPCM soundtracks! =-I
(something I didn't EVEN care about at 1st, as I was OK w/lossless, now its uncompressed BABY!!!)
|
"Crazy" is definitely the correct term.
M.
"Most people never have to face the fact that, at the right time and the right place, they're capable of anything." -- Chinatown
"What kind of movies would there be if everyone in them had to do what we thought they should do?" -- Roger Ebert
HTF Beginner's Primer and FAQ
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 05:05 PM
|
#8 of 30
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 12:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 3,194
|
Re: Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
M,
Have you heard the Stones in LPCM?!?!?!
:-0 :-0 :-0
:-) :-) :-)
Paint it Black, BABY!!!
;-)
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 05:06 PM
|
#9 of 30
|
|
Member
Location: Toronto area, Canada
Join Date: Nov 2002
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 1,941
|
Re: Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
An HD movie is not HD unless the audio is too. As simple as that for me.
Regardless of an individual's hearing ability...the common reason some use to say we don't really need it. Some people can't see too well either, but we don't have 480i "HD" video to accomodate them...
Keep the standards high and let people grow into them.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 05:47 PM
|
#10 of 30
|
|
Michael Reuben
Administrator
Location: New York City, Lehman Bros. was here
Join Date: Feb 1998
Local Time: 03:21 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 19,771
|
Re: Warner Bros.: which titles "deserve" lossless audio?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
M,
Have you heard the Stones in LPCM?!?!?!
:-0 :-0 :-0
:-) :-) :-)
Paint it Black, BABY!!!
;-)
|
I don't actually remember which lossless format I selected on Shine a Light, and I don't care, because, you know, it's, like, lossless.
M.
"Most people never have to face the fact that, at the right time and the right place, they're capable of anything." -- Chinatown
"What kind of movies would there be if everyone in them had to do what we thought they should do?" -- Roger Ebert
HTF Beginner's Primer and FAQ
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 06:39 PM
|
#11 of 30  | |