|
|
 |
|
01-15-2006, 11:40 PM
|
#1 of 54 
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Local Time: 12:59 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 185
|
Blu porn
http://www.xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=12735
Digital Playground one of the biggest porn companies has announced they will release on Blu-Ray. The first adult studio to commit to either format. Porn industry is big and which format they pick will have a large affect on which format succeeds as long as there are horny dudes. This is good news on many levels.
|
|
|
|
01-16-2006, 12:25 PM
|
#2 of 54
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Local Time: 12:59 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 8,915
|
Quote:
|
This is good news on many levels.
|
--
H
|
|
|
|
|
01-16-2006, 08:53 PM
|
#4 of 54
|
|
Member
Location: Oklahoma
Join Date: Mar 1998
Local Time: 12:59 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 2,172
|
Um, do we REALLY need high def porn? Some parts of Ron Jeremy need to stay at 480p, or less if at all possible! 
HD DVD? Check! Blu Ray? Check! High Definition Satelite? Check! HD Gaming systems? Check! 100% High Definition across the board!
http://mrbiggles.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
01-16-2006, 09:27 PM
|
#5 of 54
|
|
Ricardo C
Member
Location: Venezuela
Join Date: Feb 2002
Local Time: 01:59 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 5,142
|
Oh yeah, boobjob scars, stretch marks and hairy man-ass at 1080p...
I think it may be time give up porn altogether. Yikes.
Man, an hour wasted on this sig! Thanks, Toshiba! :p
|
|
|
|
|
01-16-2006, 09:43 PM
|
#6 of 54
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Local Time: 12:59 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 1,373
|
Will dudes get rid of their classic stash in a trunk in the basement, hidden under mom's shawls and such? - Election.
Do we really need it?
Probably.
Ryan 
This guy surrenders! (obscure Barb Wire reference)
Ryan
|
|
|
|
|
01-16-2006, 10:10 PM
|
#7 of 54
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 09:59 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 9,171
|
Kind of takes it full circle. Porn used to be watched on film in theaters, at higher resolution than the video formats available up to now.
|
|
|
|
|
01-16-2006, 11:20 PM
|
#8 of 54
|
|
HTF MGM Reviewer
Join Date: May 2002
Local Time: 09:59 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 6,210
|
EDIT
Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation. - Edward R. Murrow
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2006, 12:30 PM
|
#9 of 54
|
|
Member
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Join Date: Jul 2002
Local Time: 09:59 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 2,601
|
Quote:
|
Kind of takes it full circle. Porn used to be watched on film in theaters, at higher resolution than the video formats available up to now.
|
Yes, and the quality of "talent" was probably a little higher, too. It's a rare porn star now that stands up to scrutiny as well as Marilyn Chambers did back in the day.
R.I.P. DVDSpot 
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2006, 02:25 PM
|
#10 of 54
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 1999
Local Time: 12:59 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 4,240
|
High Def Porn, don't think I can handle that. Way too much information on screen. The last thing I ever want to see is the clarity of another man's semen. My guess these actors will go through a selection process with minimal imperfections on their bodies.
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2006, 02:29 PM
|
#11 of 54
|
|
Member
Location: SoCal
Join Date: Jan 2000
Local Time: 09:59 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 4,893
|
For HD-DVD, this means "game over man, game over"!
|
|
|
|
|
