|
|
 |
 |
 |
06-20-2006, 05:25 PM
|
#2 of 13 
|
|
Crawdaddy
Administrator
Location: Michigan
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 01:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 18,319
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dave Moritz
I have been waiting like many of us here for HD Blu-ray to come out. And now we have to wait again for Blu-ray players for some stupid reason. I know Samsungs model is now available but I am not interested in a Samsung. And to my knowledge it does not do 1080p so there is another reason not to go Samsung.
I was wondering if anyone knows what the major differences is between the Sony and Pioneer Elite players are? Besides the Pioneer costing an extra $500 more than the Sony. If the Pioneer is going to be a better HD player than the Sony I will not have a problem paying the extra cost. If it is basically the same player as the Sony I would rather save the $500 and buy the Sony. 
This new postponement of the Blu-ray release is getting old and is trying my patients.  |
What do you mean it doesn't do 1080P? To answer your other questions, since the Pioneer got pushed back to September and the Sony to the middle of August, who really knows what the specs. are going to be until they allow them to be published for the general public.
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
06-20-2006, 06:32 PM
|
#3 of 13
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 12:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 4,810
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
Quote:
|
What do you mean it doesn't do 1080P?
|
Robert, I can't speak for Dave, but you might want to read this thread over at AVS. Look at post #11 and some that follow.
Edit: Fixed link (sorry)
- Walter
Fidelity to the source should always be the goal for Blu-ray releases.
Last edited by Walter Kittel : 06-20-2006 at 06:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 06:45 PM
|
#4 of 13
|
|
Crawdaddy
Administrator
Location: Michigan
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 01:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 18,319
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Walter Kittel
Robert, I can't speak for Dave, but you might want to read this thread over at AVS. Look at post #11 and some that follow.
- Walter. |
Walter,
Your link doesn't work for me.
Crawdaddy
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 06:53 PM
|
#5 of 13
|
|
Member
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2001
Local Time: 06:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 2,442
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
Hello Robert,
Was refering to the Samsung not doing 1080p. That is my understanding that it only outputs 1080i. If that is wrong please correct me.
- 1080p High Definition Supporter
- Lossless Audio Supporter
 - Current Library: 221 DVD's / 69 HD-DVD's / 149 Blu-ray's (218 HD Titles)
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 07:15 PM
|
#6 of 13
|
|
Crawdaddy
Administrator
Location: Michigan
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 01:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 18,319
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Walter Kittel
Robert, I can't speak for Dave, but you might want to read this thread over at AVS. Look at post #11 and some that follow.
Edit: Fixed link (sorry)
- Walter |
I'm not sure what's posted in that thread is correct?
From what the manual is saying, the player outputs 1080P.
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 07:30 PM
|
#7 of 13
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 12:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 4,810
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
True, but I believe that there is an intermediate 1080i step inside the player that renders the Samsung player equivalent to connecting a 1080i output player to an external deinterlacer. This is what I thought Dave might be referring to, but you know what they say about asumptions.  Nevermind.
- Walter.
Fidelity to the source should always be the goal for Blu-ray releases.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 09:17 PM
|
#8 of 13
|
|
Member
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2001
Local Time: 06:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 2,442
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
Hey Robert,
I don't own that machine so I am going on hearsay only. I would love to know if the Samsung displays a true 1080p or if it doesn't ? I am waiting for other blu-ray players to be available. I just cant get myself to want to buy a Samsung even though its a blu-ray. I guess the disc's are now available so I look foward to a review from you Robert.
- 1080p High Definition Supporter
- Lossless Audio Supporter
- Current Library: 221 DVD's / 69 HD-DVD's / 149 Blu-ray's (218 HD Titles)
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 09:29 PM
|
#9 of 13
|
|
Member
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Join Date: Jul 2001
Local Time: 06:25 AM
Local Date: 11-19-2008
Posts: 2,442
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
Well according to the Samsung owners manual it does both 1080p and 1080i so I guess I was incorrect to belive that it was 1080i.
Was taking my information from this thread:
- 1080p High Definition Supporter
- Lossless Audio Supporter
- Current Library: 221 DVD's / 69 HD-DVD's / 149 Blu-ray's (218 HD Titles)
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 10:59 PM
|
#10 of 13
|
|
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 11:25 PM
Local Date: 11-18-2008
Posts: 5,493
|
Re: Sony vs Pioneer Elite Blu-ray Players
So far it does look like it uses the Broadcomm decoder chip that cannot do 1080p. There is a de-interlacer (don't know how good it is) that handles the 1080i signal off the decoder.
Keith from Sigma Designs had said one of the first Blu-Ray players would not handle pure 1080p off the discs and this seems to be the one.
The Pioneer, for sure, uses the new Sigma Designs decoder which allows native 1080p/24, 1080i, 720p, etc. to be output from whatever is contained on the disc. The Sony may also use this chip too.
However, it may be that the Panasonic and later the PS3 that will also have HDMI 1.3 outputs.
|
|
|
|
|
06-21-2006, 03:31 AM
|
| |
