Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum

Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum Forum Search: 
 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum


 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Archives > DVD Reviews Archive
[ HTF REVIEW: The Longest Yard (2005) - Widescreen Collector's Edition ]

Post New Thread   

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-19-2005, 01:03 PM   #1 of 24
Scott Kimball
Member
 
Location: Portland, Maine, USA
Join Date: May 2000
Local Time: 07:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 1,617


The Longest Yard (2005) - Widescreen Collector's Edition





Studio: Paramount

Year: 2005

Rated: PG-13

Length: 113 Minutes

Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1

Audio: Dolby Digital English 5.1, English / French 2.0

Subtitles: English, Spanish

Closed Captioned

Special Features: Featurettes, Deleted Scenes, Blooper Reel, Music Video

Suggested Retail Price: $29.99 USD
Release Date: September 20, 2005


Somehow, this poorly scripted, acted, and executed remake of the classic Robert Aldrich film actually made money. This, despite largely negative reviews.

The film follows the same plot as the original, while delivering none of its soul. After drunken, former NFL quarterback Paul Crewe steals his girlfriend’s car and leads the police in a high-speed chase, he gets thrown into a maximum security prison to serve a three year sentence. The warden, fully aware of Crewe’s credentials, orders him to put together an inmate football team as practice fodder for the guard’s league. Crewe and his players use the opportunity to settle the score, so to speak, against the cruel prison guards.

One has to wonder what studio executive envisioned Adam Sandler as a former pro NFL player. I’d believe Paul Reubens in the role as much as I believe Sandler. Not only is Sandler not up to the part physically, but he has absolutely no authority in the role.

Chris Rock is on hand merely to crack off-color jokes, most of which aren’t funny. He plays the role of “Caretaker,” originally played by James Hampton. And Burt Reynolds is on hand as Nate Scarboro - a role played by Michael Conrad in the original film. The role of the warden, played by Eddie Albert in the ‘74 version, is played by James Cromwell.

The original film was all about the experience. Humor was an afterthought. The improvisation in the original film made the characters seem real, and the chemistry was impressive.

This remake has people sleepwalking throughout their parts, while reading essentially the same script as the original, peppered with updated jokes that seem forced and only serve to take your attention from what matters... and what matters is handled so poorly as to diminish it to the point of not caring.

As in the original film, the best sequences are in the game footage in the final act. Of course, in this case, it’s all relative. The best parts of a bad film can be the highlights of the film and still not offer anything original or exciting.

This is an entirely forgettable film - and that is its saving grace. After 113 minutes of this playing out on your screen, you can move on, secure in the knowledge that there is nothing here that will stick with you. The only thing you have to show for it is a loss of two hours of your life.

I read Roger Ebert’s review of this film as it played in theaters. I recall that the entire review was an explanation for what amounted to his temporary insanity when he gave the film a marginal thumbs up on his syndicated television show, Ebert and Roeper. It is a sad commentary when a review of a film spends more time explaining itself than the film - and that review is more memorable than the film itself.

The Video is presented in an aspect ratio of 2.35:1 and is anamorphically enhanced. Like the film, the transfer leaves a bit to be desired.

The print is clean and free of damage

The picture is less than sharp, and yet suffers from halos at high contrast borders as a result of edge enhancement. Shadows are a bit muddy, colors are a bit inconsistent in hue and saturation, and brighter scenes suffer from a a bit of clipping in the bright whites

It’s not a terrible transfer, but it certainly could have been better - and one usually expects better of a new film.

The Audio is brought to you in a rousing and active Dolby Digital 5.1 mix. Provided is a nice and open soundfield with active surrounds, good frequency response, and solid low frequency effects. Dialog is always crisp and intelligible. There is good panning across the front soundstage for offscreen action and dialog, and appropriate use of surround effects. While rap isn’t my thing, the music is strongly represented.

Special Features

The special features are not anamorphically enhanced.

First Down and Twenty-Five to Life
This is a 20 minute fluff piece, including on-set interviews with cast and crew. Certainly not earth-shattering in content. Traditional self-congratulatory stuff here, with a hint of “making-of” material.

The Care and Feeding of Pro Athletes
Would you believe a five minute piece about who eats more on-set? That’s what this is. That’s all it is. Really.

Lights, Camera, Touchdown
The most interesting featurette, also about 5 minutes long, is all about how the football scenes were cast, choreographed and shot. It’s the only featurette really worth you time.

Extra Points with Commentary by Peter Segal
5 quick featurettes, with commentary, about how specific visuals were achieved. The problem is, most of these are under 30 seconds. There isn’t much danger of gathering useful information in under 30 seconds. The last of the five is a bit longer, and talks about creating the appearance of a huge crowd out of about 100 extras. That one flirts with being informative.

Deleted Scenes
Nine in all, with a “Play All” feature and optional director’s commentary. All together, these add up to just over 6 minutes of content. I do always appreciate a director’s commentary on deleted scenes - and one is provided. Still, only six minutes split between nine scenes doesn’t allow to the director to get into much depth on the cuts.

Music Video “ERRTIME” by Nelly

Here comes the Boom

Clips from the film cut to music. Under 3 minutes.

Fumbles and Stumbles
Almost 4 minutes of bloopers - a pretty decent blooper reel.

Previews for other coming attractions

(There is no trailer for The Longest Yard)

Final Thoughts

A dog of a film with an uninspired video transfer can’t be saved by the meager special features. The dvd does include a nice Dolby Digital 5.1 track, however.
Scott Kimball is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-19-2005, 04:15 PM   #2 of 24
Jordan_E
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Local Time: 04:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 2,257

I'm probably going to rent this one simply for the Train Wreck vibe it has going; I don't want to, but something is drawing me to this mess.




And you believe, at heart, everyone's a killer...
Jordan_E is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-19-2005, 09:53 PM   #3 of 24
Andrew Radke
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Local Time: 07:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 1,081

Send a message via ICQ to Andrew Radke Send a message via AIM to Andrew Radke Send a message via MSN to Andrew Radke Send a message via Yahoo to Andrew Radke View Member's FaceBook Profile
I actually loved this movie. I haven't yet seen the original, so I have no basis for comparison, but on its own, I can't deny that I really got a kick out of this.

It's more or less what I'd expect from a Sandler film. In other words, plenty of slapstick and a dose of vulgarity. I went into the theater with low expectations, but I was pleasantly surprised with how funny this really was. To make a long story short, I'm definitely picking this up tomorrow.



625 titles and counting......

2008 HTF DVD Challenge
Andrew Radke is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-20-2005, 03:58 PM   #4 of 24
Jordan_E
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Local Time: 04:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 2,257

Andrew, you should watch the original, if only to see Burt in the role of Paul Crewe, and then see if you can believe Sandler in the same role ever again. The original was raw, more vulgar than anything a PG-13 movie could muster, and simply one of the best football movies ever made.

BTW, rented the remake today and will be spinning it tonight.




And you believe, at heart, everyone's a killer...
Jordan_E is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-20-2005, 09:03 PM   #5 of 24
EnricoE
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Local Time: 01:24 AM
Local Date: 09-07-2008
Posts: 322

Quote:
Previews for other coming attractions


which are?


EnricoE is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-20-2005, 09:58 PM   #6 of 24
Steve Tannehill
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Local Time: 06:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 5,281

Quote:
Quote:
Previews for other coming attractions


which are?


Short ads to try to entice you into seeing another DVD or movie, but that's not important right now.

(With apologies to Leslie Nielsen in Airplane)

- Steve

P.S.: "A hospital? What is it?" "It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now."
Steve Tannehill is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-21-2005, 12:05 AM   #7 of 24
TonyD
Member
 
Location: where ever my wife lets me
Join Date: Dec 1999
Local Time: 07:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 9,868

Send a message via AIM to TonyD View Member's Myspace Profile
Quote:
One has to wonder what studio executive envisioned Adam Sandler as a former pro NFL player. I’d believe Paul Reubens in the role as much as I believe Sandler. Not only is Sandler not up to the part physically, but he has absolutely no authority in the role.

Chris Rock is on hand merely to crack off-color jokes, most of which aren’t funny. He plays the role of “Caretaker,” originally played by James Hampton.

The original film was all about the experience. Humor was an afterthought. The improvisation in the original film made the characters seem real, and the chemistry was impressive.

This remake has people sleepwalking throughout their parts, while reading essentially the same script as the original, peppered with updated jokes that seem forced and only serve to take your attention from what matters... and what matters is handled so poorly as to diminish it to the point of not caring.

bold added by me because this is exactly what i was thinking.

i've had my fill of rocks' "off color" humor, enough with the racial humor already. get a new act.

origional was a drama that had funny moments here and there.
this one is trying to hard to be funny.

the origional had more of a sense of tension, or something could go wrong.

the death of
Spoiler:
rock/caretaker
in this one seemed out of place.

just rent the first one, a better movie and a classic football movie at that.



My "B" button rarely works.
My measley attempt at a Blog--> What Did He Say?
Movies watched 2008 Watching a Mits 73831 DLP Arnold is here
TonyD is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-21-2005, 06:55 AM   #8 of 24
Scott Hamilton
Member
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Join Date: Jun 2003
Local Time: 07:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 162

Of course like all remakes they made it too PC don't want to offend anyone.

I can't believe Burt was is this horrible remake, this movie should have not been remade. Why remake a perfect cast and acted movie?

Buy the original and don't waste your time, even on a rental on this waste of time.


Scott Hamilton is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-21-2005, 10:51 AM   #9 of 24
Rhoq
Member
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Join Date: Mar 2004
Local Time: 07:24 PM
Local Date: 09-06-2008
Posts: 640

Send a message via AIM to Rhoq View Member's Wii Address