Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum

Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum Forum Search: 
 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum


 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Archives > DVD Reviews Archive
[ HTF REVIEW: Ed Wood's Necromania ]

Post New Thread   

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-16-2004, 08:12 PM   #1 of 51
Michael Elliott
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Local Time: 08:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 4,025

HTF REVIEW: Ed Wood's Necromania





Ed Wood’s Necromania







Studio: Fleshbot Films
Year: 1971
Rated: NR
Film Length: 54/51 minutes
Aspect Ratio: Standard (4:3)
Audio: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: None
Retail Price: $19.95




I must admit it’s a great honor to be able and review a film by the one and only Edward D. Wood, Jr. at this very site. Over the past twenty years a large cult following has surrounded the director thanks in large part to a book written by Michael Medved but in the last five years a bigger cult has gathered thanks to Tim Burton’s 1994 masterpiece Ed Wood, which took a look at the man many consider to be the worst director of all time.

For starters, anyone with knowledge about Wood or the type of films will tell you that this so-called book doesn’t have the slightest idea about bad movies. In fact, I’d go as far to say that these guys hadn’t even seen many of the movies they mentioned in the book and I’d go even further by saying their amount of viewed films is apparently very small. Those who only know Wood by the Burton film are again missing out on a lot of details. There was no meeting with Orson Welles, no standing ovation for Plan 9 From Outer Space and there was no end to Wood after the making of that film.

While Wood’s greatest achievement was Plan 9, the man would continue to make films, either as director or screenwriter up until his death in 1978. This here is proof that most fans of Burton’s film didn’t know that and that the “book” didn’t see any of these other films. Had this book seen any of these other movies then they’d realize that Plan 9 was a lot better than the likes of the Wood directed Night of the Ghouls, which was filmed in 1961 but not released until five years after Wood’s death because he couldn’t pay the lab bill. Wood screenplay’s included those of The Bride and the Beast, Married Too Young, One Million AC/DC and the infamous Orgy of the Dead, which really is the worst film ever made.

Those are some of Wood’s better known titles but then there was Wood’s other career of making adult films, sometimes softcore and sometimes hardcore, which he did for many years. Several of these films were written under a fake name so it took some time for people to discover that Wood actually wrote them. A few of these films have gone missing for quite some time and sadly, they’ll probably never be discovered but thankfully, through hard work and luck, Wood’s final feature film, 1971’s Necromania has finally been found in its complete form. Previous released at a cut 48-minutes, this here features the full 54-minute version, which contains some scenes, which were lost for many years.

No matter where you first heard the name Edward D. Wood, Jr., perhaps people should do a bit more viewing before bashing this man and labeling him the worst director ever. There’s a reason people watch his movies and there’s a reason Hollywood would make a film about him. I’m certainly not saying Wood was a good director because he wasn’t. He was a bad director but he did have something others didn’t have. For some reason, Wood made films that people could actually watch and get a kick out of. There had to be some talent in Wood for him to be able and get this. If it wasn’t talent then you still can’t call him the worst director. Seriously, have you seen any films by Al Adamson or Jerry Warren? Before labeling Wood as the worst director or Plan 9 From Outer Space the worst film ever made, please check out Jerry Warren’s Frankenstein Island for starters. Then follow that up with hundreds of others, which really makes Wood look like Orson Welles.

Now, enough talk about the man and now let’s take a look at Necromania.

Danny and Shirley, a young couple suffering sexual problems, shows up at the house of Madame Heles (pronounced “Heals”) in hopes that the witchdoctor can cure them. The problem is a rather hard on in the fact that Danny is having a problem rising to the occasion, which has left Shirley unsatisfied and gives her thoughts of ending the relationship. The Madame won’t show up until midnight but thankfully there’s a few other guests on hand who will try and tackle the hard job of saving the young couple.

Necromania was shot in the matter of days (if not one day) with the budget of $7,000. The film was shot in two versions, one hardcore version (54-minutes) as well as a softcore version (51-minutes), which is the one most people has seen thanks to various bootleg markets. The three minutes difference in running times is that of hardcore sex. We get a few money shots but there really isn’t that much of a difference in the two. The soft version features mostly kissing and while I’m sure it would get an NC-17 rating today, it really isn’t too graphic. This new uncut version does feature an extended ending as well as some more graphic sex.

I was fairly shocked to see how well this movie was directed. Yes, it doesn’t take too much talent to film sex scenes but Wood actually keeps the film at a nice pace as well as keeps the so-called story going. We don’t get any of the typical Wood craziness and the cast isn’t nearly as bad as those in previous Wood films. For the most part this is just a sex film but thankfully we get some tasty Wood dialogue, which is a real hoot and again, the dialogue is actually good instead of the bad stuff that usually just makes us laugh at its dumbness. The girl has some wonderfully funny insult lines thrown at her boyfriend, which are quite clever in their own way.

Other interesting moments to Wood fans will be a short cameo by Criswell’s coffin, which was previous used in Night of the Ghouls. Another charming moment is a small dedication from the director to his favorite star Bela Lugosi who has his name mentioned at the start of the film. Wood, being a huge fan of Lugosi makes a nice little turn to throw his name out there, which is nice to see. The sex scenes are not erotic but we do get some very funny dubbing, which never matches up to the lip movement. I won’t get into graphic detail but while one woman has her mouth full, the words coming out is rather funny. Other funny moments include various sound effects used for laughs as well as a nice music score, which helps things move along.

Necromania isn’t a classic Ed Wood film but I’m sure fans of the director will want to check it out. There’s enough zany moments to keep Wood fans entertained and it’s also interesting to note that the film is pretty well made considering this was probably the smallest budget Wood ever worked with and that’s saying a lot.


VIDEO---The film is shown in the Standard (4:3) ratio, which is the correct way the film should be viewed. I’m not really sure how theaters framed these types of films back in the day but it’s clear the film would be missing way too much information if it were matted. Plus, it’s not like any of the shots are framed any certain way and it seems the cameraman just set the camera up and got out of the way. I haven’t seen any of the previous releases of this film but I did watch the softcore version, which is included as an extra. This version is the same thing that has been released by other labels and it’s clear that this new version contains a better transfer.

The soft version features all sorts of issues from faded colors, watermarks, scratches, speckles and various other issues, which are mostly cleaned up in the hard version. The hard version still features plenty of faults but it’s clearly better after you’ve seen both versions. The biggest advantage to the hard version is that the colors are a lot more detailed and you can actually make out various scenes in the movie. Wood fans know that he loved pink clothing and the colors of that pink are on display in the hard version and it’s easy to see. In the soft version the pink colors are either washed out or overly dark to where they seem purple.

Again, this transfer isn’t nothing to show off your Home Theater to but then again, I’m sure you know that. The transfer features several issues but considering this film was lost as well as shot for $7,000, you really can’t expect anything better. Plus, it’s a lot better than previous versions out there.

AUDIO---We get a Dolby Digital Stereo track, which does its job just fine but again, don’t be expecting something to show off your Surround system. The dialogue is clear throughout without any cuts, scratches or hiss. A little hiss can be heard in the opening credits but that’s it. The music score also sounds very well without any problems.

EXTRAS---You get a small booklet, which tells a brief history lesson about Ed Wood and these notes are repeated on the DVD itself under the “production notes”. The biggest extra however is the inclusion of the 51-minute “soft” version, which has been released on VHS by various bootleg companies. This here marks its first official release.

OVERALL---Many folks have been waiting for this lost film to be discovered and here it is in all its glory. I’m sure those who hate Wood’s work will hate this as well but those who enjoy “B” movies and Wood should really get a kick out of the film. It’s certainly not in the same class as Plan 9 From Outer Space or Glen or Glenda? but there’s enough interesting aspect for a recommendation. Fleshbot has released a very nice package for Ed Wood fans. The inclusion of both versions is a major plus that should make Wood fans very happy.

The disc can be ordered HERE


Release Date: Now Available
Michael Elliott is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-17-2004, 03:00 AM   #2 of 51
Don Solosan
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Local Time: 06:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 430

The book people should read if they have an interest in Ed Wood is Rudolph Gray's Nightmare of Ecstacy. Medved is way off base. Sure, the man turned out some stinkers (so has Spielberg and Lucas), but his better stuff (Glen or Glenda, Bride of the Monster, and of course Plan 9) offers plenty of goofy, loopy fun -- something you can't say for Manos: the Hands of Fate or thousands of other movies -- unless you catch them on the Satellite of Love.
Don Solosan is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-19-2004, 05:18 PM   #3 of 51
Richard Gallagher
HTF Sony/Columbia Reviewer
 
Location: Fishkill, N.Y.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Local Time: 09:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 518

You wouldn't know it from the DVD, but the stars of Necromania are Rene Bond and Ric Lutze, who were prominent fixtures in the California porn community in the early seventies. Madame Heles is played by Maria Aronoff, better known as Maria Arnold, who appeared in lots of soft-core films during the seventies.



Rich Gallagher
Richard Gallagher is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-19-2004, 05:45 PM   #4 of 51
Ernest Rister
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Local Time: 07:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 4,039

"Over the past twenty years a large cult following has surrounded the director thanks in large part to a book written by Michael Medved..."


You mean The Golden Turkey Awards? I read that in High School. Pretty amusing.


"For starters, anyone with knowledge about Wood or the type of films will tell you that this so-called book doesn’t have the slightest idea about bad movies. In fact, I’d go as far to say that these guys hadn’t even seen many of the movies they mentioned in the book and I’d go even further by saying their amount of viewed films is apparently very small."

I'm no fan of Michael Medved, but I think this is unusually harsh. The Golden Turkey Awards was in no way a serious exploration of cinema, nor was it interested in biography or dramaturgy -- it was a piece of fluff, an entertaining look at some of the most notorious bad movies and performances in American film. Ed Wood's films - especially Plan 9 From Outer Space - certainly qualified for inclusion.
Ernest Rister is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-19-2004, 08:38 PM   #5 of 51
Michael Elliott
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Local Time: 08:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 4,025

Quote:
I'm no fan of Michael Medved, but I think this is unusually harsh. The Golden Turkey Awards was in no way a serious exploration of cinema, nor was it interested in biography or dramaturgy -- it was a piece of fluff, an entertaining look at some of the most notorious bad movies and performances in American film. Ed Wood's films - especially Plan 9 From Outer Space - certainly qualified for inclusion.


Wasn't THE OMEN also included along side PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE?

This book, along with the Tim Burton movie, sold ideas to a public that might not have the background of some of this stuff. Had the public or Medved had the knowledge then this book would have been written off as a joke or a book with a very poorly selected group of titles. I grew up reading and watching Medved and he most certainly took that book to be serious and quite often on his show (Sneak Previews) compared current bad films to those he wrote about. If the book was meant as a joke, Medved certainly didn't play it off that way and quite often the other critic with him (Jeffrey Lyons sp?) took shots at it.

People who have seen these movies would probably write the book off but those who haven't seen them might just take that list seriously. Since many miss the joke, I'm sure the majority takes that list as being the worst films ever made.
Michael Elliott is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-19-2004, 09:05 PM   #6 of 51
Ernest Rister
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Local Time: 07:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 4,039

"Wasn't THE OMEN also included along side PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE?"

In The Golden Turkey Awards? Not that I recall - it's been 20 years - but I think The Exorcist II was in it. Have you ever read "the book", Michael? I'm not even sure if The Golden Turkey Awards is "the book" you're talking about because you haven't yet mentioned it by name. If you are talking about The Golden Turkey Awards, then "the book" is pure fluff, like an Entertainment Weekly article. They just poke fun at some notoriously bad movies.

"People who have seen these movies would probably write the book off but those who haven't seen them might just take that list seriously. Since many miss the joke, I'm sure the majority takes that list as being the worst films ever made."

The movies in that book are among the worst films ever made. The Terror of Tiny Town, Night of the Lepus, John Wayne as Genghis Khan, etc. And that list includes Plan 9 From Outer Space. I'd agree that there are films out there that are technically "worse" than Plan 9, like the mean-spirited Manos the Hands of Fate, and snuff films and low-grade porn -- but Plan 9 rates a mention because it is so spectacularly awful. My best friend's family and I watch it every year, and we laugh ourselves silly. "Modern women. They've been like that all down through the ages." Gotta love it.
Ernest Rister is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-19-2004, 10:58 PM   #7 of 51
Michael Elliott
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Local Time: 08:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 4,025

Yes, I've read The Golden Turkey Awards and I believe they wrote The 50 Worst Films before that. These films also included THE OMEN, IVAN THE TERRIBLE, LAST YEAR AT MARINBAD and BRING ME THE HEAD OF ALFREDO GARCIA. Just about every film buff and major critic wrote these books off and Harry in later years admitted that they hadn't seen all the films they listed. They were going on what they had heard, which is my exact point why the book shouldn't be taken seriously.

PLAN 9 might be an easy pick but I wonder if the Medved's saw Wood's other films like BRIDE AND THE BEAST, ORGY OF THE DEAD or JAILBAIT. Wood wrote the first two. Then there was AIRPORT '75 and ORCA but had they seen any of the other JAWS ripoff's or were they picking on this because it was popular. THE EXORCIST 2, while bad isn't nearly as bad as some rips like BEYOND THE DOOR but I doubt they've seen this or EXORCISM or EXOCISMO. ROBOT MONSTER is an easy pick but is it worse than CAT WOMEN ON THE MOON? The same director but RM is popular enough to pick up on.

Wood was never known as the "worst director ever" until this book. This book made him a known person and then Burton's movie made everyone know him. If this people didn't know better than they might take this fiction as the truth and both the book and movie are far from it.
Michael Elliott is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-20-2004, 10:51 AM   #8 of 51
Ernest Rister
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Local Time: 07:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 4,039

"They were going on what they had heard, which is my exact point why the book shouldn't be taken seriously."

I've never heard of anyone taking The Golden Turkey Awards seriously.

Harry Medved wrote "50 Worst Films of All Time", which includes The Omen.

The Golden Turkey Awards was written by Michael Medved and Harry Medved, and it does not include The Omen, but it does make fun of many, many bad movies. Published in 1980, it was sort of the "Mystery Science Theater 3000" of its day -- and just as Ed Wood received some ribbing from Joel and his robot friends, Ed Wood got roasted in the Golden Turkey Awards. Arguments about which film is "the worst" of all time and which director is "the worst" of all time are subjective, but I think most people would agree Ed Wood is among the worst directors of all time and Plan 9 From Outer Space is among the worst films ever made.
Ernest Rister is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-20-2004, 04:12 PM   #9 of 51
Jack Shappa
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Local Time: 06:08 AM
Local Date: 08-30-2008
Posts: 391

Quote:
The problem is a rather hard on in the fact that Danny is having a problem rising to the occasion


Heh, interesting typo in there!

- Cryo
Jack Shappa is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 11-20-2004, 04:51 PM   #10 of 51