[AaronMK]

I am trying to decide on a TV purchase. Right now it is coming down to the LED DLP vs. Plasma question. In short, the LED DLP is a much better screen size value, but I'm wondering if I would not be better off with a plasma display since I don't sit that far away (7' at most, and would move sofa closer for a smaller display).

The big decision is between a smaller plasma (42" Panasonic TH-42PZ77U) or a slightly more expensive LED DLP (56" Samsung HL-T5687S). Models came from budget and reviews (online and Consumer Reports)

The TV will be used for Wii and PS3 (games, DVD, and Blu-ray). I have made 1080p a requirement because I noticed the difference on blu-ray playback, and that is the main reason for wanting a new TV.

More specific questions:
1) For the plasma: I have had my CRT for nine years and never experienced image retention. That is based on mostly watching widescreen movies (ie black bars). Is this a good indication that image retention will not be an issue for me with a plasma?

2) For the LED DLP, is bulb life a real issue? Is that 20,000 hours in the specs the actual viewing time I should expect before having to replace the bulb and what do they usually go for?

3) Anything else I should be factoring in.

Thanks for the assistance!

[Doug_H]

Aaron

If you play a lot of games you will want to avoid the Plasma because of burn in. They have gotten a lot better in that regard but still have issues.

The 20,000 hours is the expected life of the bulb, I am not sure of replacement cost though. These have not been out that long.

I have a 42" plasma in the living room now and I wish every day I had gone with a 56" DLP.

[JustMe]

Size Matters, I have a 56 in DLP and wish I had gone bigger.

[Jon Lidolt]

I have a 52" DLP and am very happy with the image. They generally don't look that great in a brightly lit store, but I find that I prefer the "look" of the picture compared to plasma or LCD when viewed in a normal home environment. To my eyes at least, the LCD picture doesn't reproduce the subtleties very well - I find the picture a bit too garish. Not to mention that over 90% of digital theatre projectors are based on DLP technology.

[troy evans]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Lidolt

Not to mention that over 90% of digital theatre projectors are based on DLP technology.

Yes, that's because DLP is one of the best projector technologies out there. However, it has nothing to do with comparison between LCD or Plasma displays which are different technology.

[troy evans]

Aaron, with current Panasonic and Samsung plasmas, image retension is not as big an issue as it used to be. If you leave a still image on your screen for 10-15 hours, like pausing a game or movie, then yes, you may have a problem. If that did happen the newer plasmas have wash screens that can reduce or remove the effects of even that kind of abuse. DLP is also very nice, picture wise. My biggest bitch with them is the color wheel thing. They can be expensive to replace. Not to mention the mother boards, bulb replacement, etc, etc. For me, plasmas are a lot less to deal with and no where near as bad as people make them out.

[Man-Fai Wong]

Quote:

Originally Posted by troy evans

Aaron, with current Panasonic and Samsung plasmas, image retension is not as big an issue as it used to be. If you leave a still image on your screen for 10-15 hours, like pausing a game or movie, then yes, you may have a problem. If that did happen the newer plasmas have wash screens that can reduce or remove the effects of even that kind of abuse.

But how well can such things work though? I thought plasmas are just lighting up the phosphors much like w/ CRT. If there is *real* burn-in (as in uneven phosphor wear), then there really should be nothing you can do to recover from that, no? Theoretically, the best you can do is use some method to try to apply the same degree wear to the less worn phosphors, but that doesn't actually mean *real* recovery -- it just means you'll end up w/ more even wear, which will still ultimately impact the overall PQ, no?

If uneven wear takes a very long time to develop, then that method of recovery would not be so bad (provided it can be done effectively and in reasonable amount of time).

But do current plasma displays actually employ some other more advanced phosphor technology that don't require such a fix for real burn-in? Do they actually have some real way to refresh the phosphors, not just try to create more even wear?

Quote:

DLP is also very nice, picture wise. My biggest bitch with them is the color wheel thing. They can be expensive to replace. Not to mention the mother boards, bulb replacement, etc, etc. For me, plasmas are a lot less to deal with and no where near as bad as people make them out.

Well, he did mention LED DLP, not just any old DLP that uses color wheel. The LED tech should take care of most of those concerns though again we have to wonder whether they're actually at least as durable as plasmas for comparable PQ output for the life of the displays.

I'm considering LED DLP myself -- and the size-to-$$$ ratio does matter a lot. But yeah, it'd also be good to know how much it costs to replace the LED if/when it should die during the useful life of the display though I get the feeling one will be better off just buying a new display by then (provided the LED doesn't die prematurely).

_Man_

[Man-Fai Wong]

BTW, anyone know what is the rate of decay in light output for LED DLPs? Samsung lists 20K hours for their LEDs, but do you actually get nearly 100% output for the entire 20K hours? OR does it drop a whole lot (to say 70%) after about halfway into its lifetime?

_Man_

[troy evans]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Man-Fai Wong

But how well can such things work though? I thought plasmas are just lighting up the phosphors much like w/ CRT. If there is *real* burn-in (as in uneven phosphor wear), then there really should be nothing you can do to recover from that, no? Theoretically, the best you can do is use some method to try to apply the same degree wear to the less worn phosphors, but that doesn't actually mean *real* recovery -- it just means you'll end up w/ more even wear, which will still ultimately impact the overall PQ, no?

I believe you are correct. My only experience with the screen washes was when a friend burned an image into his plasma. After leaving the screen wash on for about 3 hours we put up the all white screen to check for any retained images. There was no visible retension afterward. So, the technology does work. At least on his Panasonic plasma. I own a Samsung plasma. I've had it for 14 months with no problems at all. I watch widescreen movies all the time and have yet to see any image retension. This whole burn-in thing is really nothing new. The same thing happened with old CRT displays. People didn't notice it as much because they were watching smaller screens at around 19" to 32" that had limited resolution. Now, we have 40" and up with high resolution and the image retension is more noticable, but, not new.