|
|
 |
 |
 |
08-05-2005, 04:16 PM
|
#1 of 20
|
|
Member
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada
Join Date: Jul 2005
Local Time: 05:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 39
|
Plasma selection: Phillips PF9956 vs. Samsung R4272 vs. Panasonic 42PX500
Ok, This newb needs some help from you veterans.
I have finally decided to get a 42" HDtv for my family room. Can't stand the DLP (I see the rainbows, and feel a flicker), loved the LCOS and could get by the the LCD RP, but finally realized that I need wide viewing angles, given our room. Plasma seems to be the best choice for me, given the viewing angles and ambient lighting. Our family viewing will be 50% SD, 30% DVD, and 20% HD. However, my viewing, which matters more ;-), will have more DVD.
Based on my budget, I have short-listed the Phillips PF9956, the Samsung R4272, and the Panasonic 42PX500. The Panasonic is about US$300-500 more than the other two. Been reading here for a while, but trying to make a decision between these is not easy. I found a strong following for the Panasonic at this forum and at AVS. This is what I have gathered till now, and would love more details.
The Panny has the pluses of deep blacks and great overall PQ. The Sammy has 13 bit processing (debatable if it makes a difference), is cheaper (~$400), 2 yr waranty, and has more inputs. I cannot find any opinions on the Phillips.
The picture quality may be an issue with the Sammy, but I haven't been able to get any confirmed opinion on that. I do not want fake contouring (clay face) - picture quality is important to me. "Not-deep" blacks will NOT be an issue once the plasma is in my house and I do not have any other to compare it to.
Can someone please elaborate more on these or other issues? How bad is the clay-face on Sammy, and on the panny? Thanks.
|
|
|
 |
 |
08-05-2005, 04:35 PM
|
#2 of 20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Local Time: 02:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 971
|
From a reliability and customer service standpoint, I would go with the Panny. I've not been impressed with the QC on either of the other two companies products of any type.
Mort
|
|
|
08-11-2005, 11:02 AM
|
#3 of 20
|
|
Member
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada
Join Date: Jul 2005
Local Time: 05:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 39
|
Thanks Mort,
Based on your comments, and the strong following at these forums for the panny, I bought the 42PX500 yesterday. It is being delivered today.
Now, I'm trying to read up on initial precautions and startup info. Am also trying to decide whether to get an upconverting dvd player or let the PX do the scaling.
Need to do more searching and reading...
Any pointers to links and threads would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
08-11-2005, 02:50 PM
|
#4 of 20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Local Time: 02:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 971
|
First, get one of the tune up disks. I've not played with the latest version of the Panny, but prior models all come out of the box with the picture set in torch mode. If nothing else, turn down the brightness and contrast for at least the first 100 hours of use.
Congradulations....you're gonna love it.
Mort
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 02:20 PM
|
#5 of 20
|
|
Member
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada
Join Date: Jul 2005
Local Time: 05:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 39
|
Spent a few hours yesterday setting up the new Plasma. For now, I have lowered the brightness, contrast, and color to -2, and sharpness to 0. I know that this is probably much softer and overkill for the break-in period, but I don't mind being a little extra careful for the first few hours. I will keep increasing in slowly until the 100 hours mark, and then I might set my optimum levels using Avia or something.
One interesting side-effect of this lowering levels is how good the lo quality signal look, even home-recorded VHS tapes at SLP speeds.
The only regret I'm having is the 42" size; after watching a couple of movies this weekend, I'll decide if I want to up it to the 50 inches.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 02:44 PM
|
#6 of 20
|
|
ISF Calibrationist - HT Expert
Join Date: Mar 2000
Local Time: 03:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 3,445
|
Greetings
Unfortunately, this set cannot be professionally calibrated. It is pretty much what it is OOTB with little potential for being more than what it is.
Regards

Michael @ The Laser Video Experience
THX Video Systems Instructor
ISF Calibration Instructor
Lion A/V Consultants Network
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 03:57 PM
|
#7 of 20
|
|
Member
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada
Join Date: Jul 2005
Local Time: 05:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 39
|
Hi Michael,
So what you are saying is that there is no need for me to try and dig into the service menus?
Will DVE be of any use?
Thanks.
|
|
|
08-12-2005, 04:45 PM
|
#8 of 20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Local Time: 02:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 971
|
I own Avia, DVE and S&V tune up, and while they are all pretty good, for my plasma display I found Avia to be the easiest to use that rendered good results. Actually, before even using the disk(s) I tried the Steaming Rat method. After getting the disks I found that the Rat method was a 95%+ match for what the disks provided. None of the disks (at least the vintage I bought 2 years ago) are really taylored for plasmas...they lean more towards RPCRT. Anyway...this is a little long but worth the read.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...hreadid=261309
Mort
|
|
|
08-13-2005, 07:43 AM
|
#9 of 20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Local Time: 09:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 8
|
Harp: For a Philips review on a plasma go to Sound & Visions website and look under "archives" and then equipment reports - then look under the number 6 - this is from the November 04 issue - the model here is PF9966 - not sure what the difference is. Another good site to look at for all manufacturers is "Home cimema Choice" - this is out of the uk but it has more reviews than anything you will find in North America. If your are considering the philips check and see if it has pixel plus for standard definition programming and compare this to the other sets as all of these sets have great pictures on hi def and dvd but are usually poor on standard definition.
Hope this helps
Mike
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 03:47 AM
|
#10 of 20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Local Time: 02:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 4
|
Hasn't plasma reach the end of the road? Looking at the samsung web site on your 4272, I can't see how can this be possible:
==>>60,000 Hour Panel Life (27 Years @ 6 hrs a day)
Doesn't the color fades out after 2 years or so?
As well, when you pause a screen for say 30 minutes, the "burn in" glues to the screen, and that's the end of your plasma.
So I honestly thought LCD has stepped in to replace plasma.
|
|
|
09-11-2005, 01:15 PM
|
#11 of 20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Local Time: 09:21 PM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 23
|
I bought the 50" about 3 weeks ago and I'm flat out in love. The color and detail, especially for HD, is just sick. The only complaint that I have about the TV is the remote. I'm not a fan of it, but it's serviceable.
|
|
|
|