Burn In is not such a big issue any more. Lastest studies I've studied indicate so
Technologies such as "orbiting" or micro-pixel
movement were created to decrease the possibility for burn-in
TV tested:
From IDC:
... Most potential buyers scared off by the notion of plasma "burn-in" are more focused on the damage caused while pausing a football game or their favorite show on TiVo for a few minutes while running around the house. Our tests show that current plasma technology can tolerate a full 48-hour session on pause, and then resume its original state with no permanent effects after a 24-hour video loop. Thus, while it is unlikely that a consumer of a current generation (or later) plasma TV will even notice any image retention caused by 5 or 10 or even 60 minutes on pause, it is most definite that any such image retention will disappear over the course of subsequent TV watching.
1-5 rating score - 5 -most noticable
Results:
After the 48-hour test, all LCD and microdisplay rear projection televisions scored a "1", as there was no indication of any image retention after the
test period. Plasma, on the other hand, did show clear signs of image retention, with all displays scoring a "5" after 48-hours of displaying the video game menu.
However,after running a movie loop on each plasma display for 24 hours, ISF testers could not perceive the previously retained images while watching video on the plasmas after the 24 hour "fix". As such, plasma's image retention score went back down to a "1".
>> Brian , I hope this helps you a bit...
That being said -- from your choices, I'd lean with the Samsung for DLP as they are the furthest along in their DLP generations.
**HLP4663W 46" DLP projection
Tico
tico@tvauthority.com