Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum Forum Search: 
 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum



Reviewed (10/11/08)
Home Theater forum blazes ahead with reviews that are designed to help you make the right viewing choice! This week Ken McAlinden reviews Albert Lewin's MGM adaptation of Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, a highly awaited release that gets notable recommendation. Todd Erwin gives us two reviews of the recent "Indie" releases, Harold, starring Spencer Breslin -and- Dororo, a live-action comic book adaptation directed by Akihko Shiota. TVShowsOnDVD this week include 30 Rock: Season 2, The Sarah Silverman Program Season Two Volume One, Lil' Bush: resident of the United States Season Two, and Mission Impossible: The Fifth Season. Finally, new Blu-ray reviews include Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, The 40-Year-Old Virgin and Poltergeist.
 
TV and HDTV Programming (10/11/08)
Warm up your cool fall season with new premiers this week that include Little People Big World (PICTURED, 5th Season, 10/13, TLC); Samantha Who? (2nd Season, 10/13, ABC); My Own Worst Enemy (10/13, NBC); Eli Stone (2nd Season, 10/14, ABC); Time Warp (10/15, DISCVRY); Parking Wars (2nd Season, 10/15, A&E); David Alan Grier's Chocolate News (10/15, COMEDY CENTRAL); Crusoe (10/17, NBC) and Real Simple Real Life (10/17, TLC). Season Finales this week include The Cleaner (10/13 A&E); The Rachel Zoe Project (10/14, BRAVO); Project Runway (10/15, BRAVO) and Destination Truth (10/15 SCI-FI). You can discuss all your favorite programs with other HTF members in our TV & HDTV programming forum

 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Home Theater Hardware > Display Devices (TVs/Projectors)
[ SCREEN SHOTS: 4 Brands Of Component Video Cable Compared.... ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-15-2005, 10:46 PM   #1 of 31
Rich H
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Local Time: 01:55 AM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 295

Hey guys, I did this on another forum and people seemed to enjoy it (and the results were fascinating), so I thought I'd bring it here too.

I am posting a link to a gallery of screen shots. The shots compare the performance of 4 different brands of component video cables in my system. These are DVD images on my Panasonic 42" ED plasma. I used freeze-frame images and switched between the 4 brands of cable, taking a screen shot of each.

In the gallery, for each DVD image, you'll find 4 uncompressed file screen shots - one of each cable brand image - and then those same screen shots "ZOOMED IN" or enlarged via photo editing software, so you can look for more fine details.

Before I reveal which brand is which, this will be a "blind test" poll with each brand only represented by A,B,C or D. Please view the shots and then post your vote for the Cable that seemed to produce the best images. (Cable A, B, C, D..or if you can't tell a difference between them please say so). Also, please post any comments you have about the images. I will reveal the identity of each cable in the screen shots after the poll (maybe after a day or so).

I've found two methods are good for comparing the shots. One is to click on the first shot in a sequence (make sure ORIGINAL SIZE is indicated below the image, if not select original size and all subsequent shots will open up in original size). Then, to the top right of the image just click on "Next" to switch to the next screen shot. Alternatively you could open up the shots in separate browser windows...or whatever.



Here Is The Link To The Cable Comparison Screen Shots

Obviously there is nothing definitive about this, but I figured I'd share the fun (pain, actually) of my own comparison with the folks here.

The 1 Meter Length Component Cables I used were these 4 brands:


XLO ER DVD3 Component Cables. ($170 Canadian)



Ultra Link Challenger Home Theater Series. The cheapest cables at $40 CDN a meter.


Canare V3-3C Component Cables. These cost me about $70 CDN to have professionally made locally.

Nordost Optix Video Cables. Top of the line boutique cables. These are always reviewed as about the top performance you can buy for video cables. 1 meter costs $360 CDN.


BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION

As a long time audiophile and more recently videophile (hideous labels, but what the heck) I am well steeped in the issue of Cable Wars: how much if any difference do various brands of cables make in terms of perceptible differences in performance. I've done the rounds with audio cables and power cables many times, including blind testing. It's only been the past couple years that I've started comparing video cables. The part of me that is an inveterate tweaker wants cables to make a difference, because I always want more performance out of my system. My rational, scientific side says the basic facts of engineering say that, any competently made cable, appropriately deployed (e.g. at a length at which it performs properly, and not in an abnormally "noisy" interference environment) SHOULD look indistinguishable from another competent cable. My wallet also does not want to see a really expensive cable outperform one I can afford.

I had to re-cable a bit of my system recently and whished to purchase 17 ft of cable from my video switcher to my 42" Panasonic Plasma. I wanted a known quantity, a professional-grade cable well made. After agonizing of the specs of RG6 cables from Belden and Canare I ended up "letting go" of my specs infatuation in order to get the more flexible Canare LV-61S cables. These seemed a good choice because they have some bending and twisty routes, including attaching to my plasma, which I move about on it's articulated arm mount. I also had a 4 foot length of Canare V3-3C (included in the test images) made up to go from my DVD player to my Inday Video Switcher. While the specs aren't as impressive as the Canare and Belden RG6-based cables, my Canare cables are in engineering terms supposed to easily meet the needs of HD transmission (at the lengths I'm using) and be way over-kill for Progressive DVD. After all, this is the stuff - Canare and Belden - typically used in the professional studios that are actually making the content we view.

But of course each boutique cable manufacturer makes it's claim to how their cable affects the images on your display. "Clearer, sharper, richer color than the other brand." We see reviews mentioning "smoother, lower picture noise, more vivid reds, more dimensional etc." Now, it would be one thing if these claims were associated with really, really long runs of cable (for instance, you might start looking for trouble with some cables after the propagation of one video wave length which I think is about 66 feet). However, these claims are generally made for comparisons between short lengths of cable - 1 or two meters for instance. At which point many Electrical Engineers will tend to scoff that one would see any performance difference between decent cables.

So, out of curiosity I did my own little shoot out between the fairly low cost Ultra Link cables up through to the most lauded Nordost video cables to see if I could see a difference. I didn't have anyone to help me so it wasn't a blind test, just me trying to spot differences. Now, it might be protested that DVD on a 42" ED plasma wouldn't be good enough to spot cable differences. I would counter that with: The cable makers and reviewers make claims that one WILL see differences on set-ups like mine. Secondly, the resolution of 480p (progressive scan DVD) is way below any frequency limitations one should find in a decent cable. And it's not like an ED plasma doesn't have enough resolution - it has plenty of resolution for the limits of DVD.

Now, while the screen shots represent 4 brands of cable at about 1 meter length each, my own testing went beyond that to testing my 16 ft length of Canare against those shorter-length cables too, and also testing my Inday Video Switcher for any visible degradation. At one point I compared my DVD playing through the meter of Canare V3-3C cable, into the Inday switcher, out the 16 foot length to the plasma, against the Nordost 1m length of cable directly into my plasma. Unfortunately I'll have to elaborate on what I saw after the Poll is done here.

Have fun.


Rich H is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 12:56 AM   #2 of 31
Brad E
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Local Time: 06:55 PM
Local Date: 10-15-2008
Posts: 300

Thanks for taking the time to set this up. How did you take the pictures? Did you have the camera on a tripod?

I did notice slight (very slight) differences from cable to cable. But I could not distinguish which one was the best, or the worst.

My conclusion: Cables are cables, they are essentially the same.
Brad E is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 05:05 AM   #3 of 31
Parker Clack
Parker Clack
Owner
 
Location: KC MO
Join Date: Jul 1997
Local Time: 08:55 PM
Local Date: 10-15-2008
Posts: 38,713

Send a message via ICQ to Parker Clack View Member's FaceBook Profile
I am like Brad in that I really didn't see THAT much of a difference but out of the images that you have displayed I prefer C.

Parker
Parker Clack is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 08:29 AM   #4 of 31
Mike Ki
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Local Time: 08:55 PM
Local Date: 10-15-2008
Posts: 49

I think that C looks the best by far. Please let me know what type of cables those are as I will be purchasing my component cables soon.
Thanks Mike
Mike Ki is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 11:46 AM   #5 of 31
Brian Fellmeth
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Local Time: 01:55 AM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 949

Cable C looks best and the others are all the same.
Brian Fellmeth is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 12:51 PM   #6 of 31
Dick Boneske
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Local Time: 01:55 AM
Local Date: 10-16-2008
Posts: 127

Thanks for taking the time to do this test. I've seen similar tests done for audio cables (especially speaker cables), which can get just as expensive as video--some people spend 30-40% as much on cables as they spend for their loudspeakers. If they would look inside their amplifiers' speaker output circuit and wiring inside their speakers, they would be astounded to see 18 gage or smaller hookup wire. To some of you it may make sense to run 12 gage or larger wire between your amplifier and speaker, but a blind test like the one Rich did here may surprise most people.

As for your results with video cables, Rich, it seems to me that evaluating picture quality on a 19" or smaller computer screen is impossible. For those that think "C" is the best quality picture, it would be interesting to see what they would say if you changed the order around before revealing the cables used.

I predict there will be no discernable difference with any of the cables no matter what the screen size. It would have been interesting to throw in some Radio Shack or other low-cost cables for comparison, also.

Let's hope this prompts some people viewing this forum to spend their money on items that actually make an improvement, like a better monitor.



Dick
Dick Boneske is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 04:52 PM   #7 of 31
Andre D
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Local Time: 08:55 PM
Local Date: 10-15-2008
Posts: 70

Send a message via AIM to Andre D
I see no difference between the 4 screen shots. Also, if I do have to look that closely at each of them, the difference is not worth paying for. When someone talks to me about seeing or hearing a huge difference between cables, I just agree with them to shut them up. I do understand that everyone has their own opinion when it comes to cables. This is one argument that will never cease.
Andre D is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 07:01 PM   #8 of 31
PerryD
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Local Time: 08:55 PM
Local Date: 10-15-2008
Posts: 845

I agree that C looks better, mainly due to sharpness, and B looks the worst, again due to sharpness. I could not tell any difference in color quality. I only compared the New York city scene.
PerryD is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 01-16-2005, 08:27 PM   #9 of 31
Scott Sox
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Local Time: 08:55 PM
Local Date: 10-15-2008
Posts: 5

I picked C as the best and A as the worst. Differences were slight and it took some effort to see them. In day to day use I really don't think it would matter.
Scott Sox is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post