Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
 
 

Warner Brothers Batman The Dark Knight Warner Brothers Batman The Dark Knight

Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Live Search: 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum




 
Forum Jump

Home Theater Forum > Other Diversions > Computers and HTPC
[ iTunes 7 -- major step backwards? ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-13-2006, 12:00 AM   #1 of 63
DaveF
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 01:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 5,162

iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


I've just installed iTunes 7 for my PC, and my impression after 30 minutes of playing is that this is a major step backwards in usability. Perhaps it takes more time? How's it working for you?

The new music organization / browsing systems are terrible to me. The previous system was a nuisance, but this is worse. I still find Windows Media Player the best: a simple list of album titles is all I really want.

Artwork. Again, I'm amazed that WMP is still lightyears ahead of iTunes for album artwork. It just downloads the artwork when you rip a CD. iTunes has not done that before, requiring manual labor to add artwork. Now, it purports to provide artwork, but first I had to create an iTunes account. That took some creativity and luck to accomplish without surrendering a credit card number. And then, it auto-retrieved artwork for maybe 30% of my CDs. I manually forced it to download for another 10-20%, perhaps. But there are still albums that are know by iTunes, but it won't download the artwork. Or other cases where the ripped album info, generated by iTunes, differs from that in the music store, so it can't connect my files to the store files. How weird. And it's missing many "basic" albums, like all Disney Soundtracks.

Ugh. For the company behind the "it just works" ideology, I'm impressed by how mediocre iTunes is. I like PodCasts feature a lot, but beyond that, I wish I could synch my nano via Media Player. I just like it better.
DaveF is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 01:46 AM   #2 of 63
Adam Lenhardt
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Local Time: 01:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 8,764

Send a message via AIM to Adam Lenhardt
Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


Anyone else finding the new versions of iTunes and QuickTime to be major resource hogs? My system's choking like it never did with v6 and below.



Approximately Adam Reviews
Adam Lenhardt is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 02:56 AM   #3 of 63
drobbins
Dave
Member
 
Location: KY
Join Date: Dec 2004
Local Time: 12:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 1,397

Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


I can't believe they could make itunes worse! I am still using v6, and I never understood why you aren't able to drag-n-drop songs into the ipod. Each time my daughter wants songs added, she has me do it because she can't figure it out. Considering that adding songs into the ipod is one of itunes primary reasons for existing, they really need to make it more user friendly. Sound like I should avoid the upgrade.


drobbins is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 03:08 AM   #4 of 63
Patrick_S
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Local Time: 06:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 2,962

Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveF
I've just installed iTunes 7 for my PC, and my impression after 30 minutes of playing is that this is a major step backwards in usability. Perhaps it takes more time? How's it working for you?

The new music organization / browsing systems are terrible to me. The previous system was a nuisance, but this is worse. I still find Windows Media Player the best: a simple list of album titles is all I really want.

Artwork. Again, I'm amazed that WMP is still lightyears ahead of iTunes for album artwork. It just downloads the artwork when you rip a CD. iTunes has not done that before, requiring manual labor to add artwork. Now, it purports to provide artwork, but first I had to create an iTunes account. That took some creativity and luck to accomplish without surrendering a credit card number. And then, it auto-retrieved artwork for maybe 30% of my CDs. I manually forced it to download for another 10-20%, perhaps. But there are still albums that are know by iTunes, but it won't download the artwork. Or other cases where the ripped album info, generated by iTunes, differs from that in the music store, so it can't connect my files to the store files. How weird. And it's missing many "basic" albums, like all Disney Soundtracks.

Ugh. For the company behind the "it just works" ideology, I'm impressed by how mediocre iTunes is. I like PodCasts feature a lot, but beyond that, I wish I could synch my nano via Media Player. I just like it better.
Dave you can set up the new version just like the old one. While I kind of like flipping through the artwork I’ll stay with the browser that shows Genre, Artist and Album.

I had most of my artwork already in iTunes but for some reason it failed to bring over some the covers I already had.

I haven’t checked to see if this is a resource hog, I'll have to do that one Wednesday.
Patrick_S is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 08:01 AM   #5 of 63
Craig S
Craig Seanor
Member
 
Location: League City, TX (just south of Planet Houston)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Local Time: 12:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 5,923

Send a message via Skype™ to Craig S
Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


Quote:
I am still using v6, and I never understood why you aren't able to drag-n-drop songs into the ipod.
Uh, you've always been able to drag-n-drop onto the iPod, if that's really what you want to do. Just turn off the auto-sync feature.

To me it's easier to just use auto-sync. Just dock the iPod, and wait. Updated automatically. What could be easier?? Why hassle with drag-n-drop??
Craig S is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Old 09-13-2006, 08:04 AM   #6 of 63
DaveF
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Local Time: 01:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 5,162

Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


Quote:
Dave you can set up the new version just like the old one.
Thanks, I'll look for that. I only played with the three view selection buttons.

Quote:
I can't believe they could make itunes worse! I am still using v6, and I never understood why you aren't able to drag-n-drop songs into the ipod. Each time my daughter wants songs added, she has me do it because she can't figure it out.
I believe you can. In iTunes preferences, set the iPod for manual music management. Then drag the music from within iTunes library to the iPod icon (when it's connected).

However, after struggling to understand the iTunes way of life, I found the secret is using PlayLists. To keep new music on the iPod use the most recently added playlist (I believe there's an auto playlist for new music). Have the iPod preferences set to always update that playlist, and the iPod should keep up to date whenever she synchs.

Most of my music management problems derive from PodCasts. iTunes is not smart enough to delete before trying to add.
DaveF is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 09:38 AM   #7 of 63
RichP
Member
 
Location: New York City
Join Date: Aug 1998
Local Time: 02:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 293

Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


Quote:
Originally Posted by drobbins
I can't believe they could make itunes worse! I am still using v6, and I never understood why you aren't able to drag-n-drop songs into the ipod.

You can, and have been able to since version 1. I don't understand how after 6 revisions, some folks still don't understand how to use iTunes.
RichP is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 09:51 AM   #8 of 63
Yumbo
Chris Caine
Member
 
Location: Suva, Fiji
Join Date: Sep 1999
Local Time: 06:20 PM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 2,652

Send a message via AIM to Yumbo
Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


It's brilliant, faster, better cache.


Yumbo is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 10:07 AM   #9 of 63
Scott Merryfield
Member
 
Location: Michigan
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 01:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 9,799

Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


Quote:
Why hassle with drag-n-drop??

Try fitting a 50GB music collection onto both a 40GB ipod (mine) and a 6GB ipod mini (wife's) without drag-n-drop. The only other option is two playlists auto-synched to each ipod, but you still need to move music in and out of those playlists, which is no simpler than just drag-n-drop directly to the ipod.

I downloaded version 7 but have not installed it yet. I was waiting for feedback from others. It sounds like I may want to wait awhile for Apple to release some patches.


Scott Merryfield is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 10:28 AM   #10 of 63
Craig S
Craig Seanor
Member
 
Location: League City, TX (just south of Planet Houston)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Local Time: 12:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 5,923

Send a message via Skype™ to Craig S
Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


Quote:
Try fitting a 50GB music collection onto both a 40GB ipod (mine) and a 6GB ipod mini (wife's) without drag-n-drop. The only other option is two playlists auto-synched to each ipod, but you still need to move music in and out of those playlists, which is no simpler than just drag-n-drop directly to the ipod.
Simple!! Just upgrade both of your iPods to the new 80GB model, and you'll be good to go for quite some time.

Kidding.

I do feel your pain. I actually have a similar situation, with a 90GB+ music library (and growing) and two iPods. I use auto-synched Smart Playlists, and separate the music between the two pods based on genre. So it all happens automagically. I realize that's probably not an option with you & your wife.

To me, the value of using playlists vs. d-n-d direct to the iPod is you can add/delete music out of your playlist at any time, and it will all get synched when you drop the iPod into the cradle.

All that said, we're all different. iTunes is pretty much a "my way or the highway" app (like much of what comes from Apple). For those that prefer not to work with the iTunes paradigm, there are alternatives. Anapod Explorer is the best known and is supposed to be quite good.
Craig S is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Old 09-13-2006, 10:45 AM   #11 of 63
Adam Lenhardt
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Local Time: 01:20 AM
Local Date: 12-04-2008
Posts: 8,764

Send a message via AIM to Adam Lenhardt
Re: iTunes 7 -- major step backwards?


I think it's quicktime that's fucked up. It seems like it isn't preloading enough of the movie into memory, so once it catches up to the point where it's preloaded, it starts to choke. The same thing happens to movies that played fine in the previous Quicktime (Quicktime 7.?).



Approximately Adam Reviews
Adam Lenhardt is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif