Forum NewsForumsHTF Chat Hardware ReviewsSoftware Reviews HTF Events
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum

Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum Forum Search: 
 
Web Search: 
 
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum


 
Forum Jump

Forum Sponsors

Home Theater Forum > Home Theater > Basics
[ Differences in RG-6 cable? ]

Post New Thread  Reply

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-09-2004, 10:09 AM   #1 of 17
Tim Holyoke
Member
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Join Date: Nov 2002
Local Time: 05:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 264

Differences in RG-6 cable?


I usually get my coax from Radioshack since it's the only place that really carries it in my small town. I live in the country, and have satellite, so always got the RG-6 that was labeled "satellite coax." There is also "TV coax." Is there really a difference? I only ask because I have 50' of "TV coax" sitting around and I need 50' for a new satellite run. Thanks a lot for any help.

Tim
Tim Holyoke is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-09-2004, 11:56 AM   #2 of 17
Ryan Leemhuis
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Local Time: 06:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 484

Yes, TV coax is probably RG5 which can't support the bandwidth of a digital signal.
Ryan Leemhuis is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-09-2004, 12:02 PM   #3 of 17
Wayne A. Pflughaupt
Member
 
Location: Katy, TX
Join Date: Aug 1999
Local Time: 05:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 6,487

Send a message via Yahoo to Wayne A. Pflughaupt
There is a difference, Tim. You’ve probably noticed that the “satellite coax” (better know as RG-6) is thicker overall. It has a thicker center conductor, and the dielectric (the white insulator around the center conductor) is a larger diameter than the “TV coax” (better known as RG-59). Those differences are critical to delivering the best signal for satellite. Using RG-59 can degrade picture quality, like giving vertical bars or lines in the picture on some channels.

Broadcast signals work fine with RG-59 or RG-6.

Regards,
Wayne A. Pflughaupt


Wayne A. Pflughaupt is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-09-2004, 04:17 PM   #4 of 17
Tim Holyoke
Member
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Join Date: Nov 2002
Local Time: 05:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 264

Thanks for the replies guys. I should have mentioned in my original question that both were RG-6. After actually looking at the cables, not just the box itself, I found both the "TV coax" and "Satellite coax" had all the exact same numbers (RG-6, 75 ohm, 18 AWG). The only difference was that the satellite one said "satellite" on the cable. So if the numbers are all the same, are they the same? Maybe they just call one "satellite" so they can charge a few bucks more? Thanks again.

Tim
Tim Holyoke is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-09-2004, 04:41 PM   #5 of 17
MikeRo
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Local Time: 10:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 2

Well, if they are both marked as RG6, I would say that either one would work. You can't hurt anything by trying the cable you already have anyway. They probably did mark one as satellite so that they can make a few bucks extra.
MikeRo is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
HTF Ads



Sponsored links



Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-10-2004, 12:06 AM   #6 of 17
Chu Gai
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Local Time: 06:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 7,403

I'd look at the center conductor to see if it's 100% copper or copper over steel. When one is dealing only with frequencies above say 50 MHz, you can use the latter as the signal is largely located on the 'skin' of the conductor and the steel carries nothing. Hence there's no reason to use all copper which is more expensive.
Chu Gai is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-14-2004, 03:23 PM   #7 of 17
Kenneth Harden
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Local Time: 03:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 1,355

Well, at Best Buy, a 6' chenk of RG-6 is $6.99, so it is probably worth it to splurge.

I would like to try a piece of RG-59 and see if there really is a difference.
Kenneth Harden is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-16-2004, 02:35 PM   #8 of 17
Chris Lanni
Member
 
Location: In my Home.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Local Time: 06:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 130

Hi guys...

RG6 is what all of your cable companies run for your cable tv. It is also what is used for satellite television. Usually you will find that there is a seperate ground wire running along the outside of the "satellite" RG6. RG6 has an 18 gauge center conductor, whereas, RG59 has a 22 gauge center conductor. You really do not want anything to do with RG59 as it is obsolete. If you have two cables and they both are stamped RG6 along the side of the wire then they are the same, unless one says quad shield. Then it just has an extra pair of shields.

Gods Love
chris
Chris Lanni is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-16-2004, 02:35 PM   #9 of 17
Chris Lanni
Member
 
Location: In my Home.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Local Time: 06:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 130

Hi guys...

RG6 is what all of your cable companies run for your cable tv. It is also what is used for satellite television. Usually you will find that there is a seperate ground wire running along the outside of the "satellite" RG6. RG6 has an 18 gauge center conductor, whereas, RG59 has a 22 gauge center conductor. You really do not want anything to do with RG59 as it is obsolete. If you have two cables and they both are stamped RG6 along the side of the wire then they are the same, unless one says quad shield. Then it just has an extra pair of shields.

Gods Love
chris
Chris Lanni is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-17-2004, 02:11 PM   #10 of 17
Leo Kerr
Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Local Time: 06:20 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 1,569

RG-59 is obsolete?

Odd that Beldin probably sells more RG59 than any other cable that they make...

Starting next week, our contractors are probably going to start pulling in one or two miles of '59...

Now if you want an obsolete cable, look at RG-117.

Leo Kerr
Lkerr1@alumni.umbc.edu
Leo Kerr is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Old 06-17-2004, 03:07 PM   #11 of 17