Quote:
|
This all seems so complicated
|
Part of the problem is that the technical-terms get turned into marketing terms and loose their meaning.
Example: A "Progressive Scan" DVD player does not exist. The "Progressive" means that the video lines are sampled/drawn in natural order instead of interlace. "Scan" refers to the scan-lines/electron-beam on your television tube as it 'paints' a picture. But the term "Progressive Scan" has stuck.
Let's try and explain things:
Quote:
|
I might not need a progressive DVD in order to watch movies at their best quality because my TV might do the deinterlacing for me
|
All current HDTV's will take a standard, interlace video signal (called "480i") and do at least 2 things to it:
- De-Interlace the rows of video (make it progressive)
- Do 3:2 pull-down detection/compensation (movies and video have different Frames-Per-Second rates and this is how film is converted to video FPS).
This is also exactly what a Progressive Scan DVD player will do.
So why is a Progressive Scan DVD considered 'better'?
Because the DVD player does all the work with the
Digital information straight from the disk so it has better control.
A ordinary DVD player with a HDTV will:
- Read the Digital information from the DVD
- Convert the information to Analog
- Send the video (480i) out the wires to the TV
- The HDTV takes the Analog signal and has to CONVERT it back to digital.
- Use the converted digital information to De-Interlace and do 3:2 pulldown
- CONVERT the digital information to analog for display
See those 2 extra conversions - it's like taking a photo-copy of a page, making another copy from the copy and reading. The "copy of the copy" is readable, but it's not as clear/sharp/clean as the original.
This is why in general, a Progressive-Scan DVD player will do a 'better' job with the same HDTV than a non-progressive unit: the extra conversions are skipped.
Does this help?