Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris Huber
We'd always like to put the full amount in each year, because the compounding later on would be better. However, 10k a year is a bit of a stretch. Would it be better to have 1 account and be able to always contribute the max, or is it better to keep both accounts and maybe be able to only stick 3-4k in each year?
|
If I understand the question correctly, you seem to think that putting the money in a single account give a better return due to compound interest. This isn't true.
Let's say you put $100 in an account that earns 5% and leave it there for 10 years. You end up with:
100*1.05^(10)=$162.89
Now lets say instead of doing that you put 2 lots of $50 in two separate accounts earing 5%
2*(50*10.5^(10))=2*($81.44)=$162.89
So you see putting it all in one pot is the same as putting it in two different pots with the same interest rate. So just putting all the money in the same account doesn't increase the amount of compound interest.
Getting two accounts however lets you spread the risk more so is wise from that perspective.
My wife and I have two Roths with different risk profiles. We have maxed them out until now but with having a child, we'll see for next year.
If you understand this perfectly well then please accept my apologies.