|
|
 |
|
11-17-2003, 06:25 PM
|
#1 of 85
|
|
Nick So
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Local Time: 01:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 5,429
|
Quick question: What years consist of the 21st century?
Im writing a paper, and I was wondering what year is the 21st century? is it 2000-2099? And the 20th would be 1900-1999 is this correct?
Thanks
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 06:36 PM
|
#2 of 85
|
|
Member
Location: W. Des Moines, IA
Join Date: Dec 2000
Local Time: 04:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 2,362
|
There was no year 0 (zero), so each centuries begin with 1.
00:00:00 on 01 January 2001 through 23:59:59 on 31 December 2100 would be your answer.
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 07:22 PM
|
#3 of 85
|
|
Nick So
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Local Time: 01:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 5,429
|
Ah, okay, so we would be currently in the 20th century...
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 08:19 PM
|
#4 of 85
|
|
Member
Location: W. Des Moines, IA
Join Date: Dec 2000
Local Time: 04:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 2,362
|
No. We are in the 21st. 1-100 was the first century, 1901-2000 was the 20th and 2001-2100 is the 21st.
It is similar to thinking of your age. If you are "10 years-old," you are currently in your 11th year:
0-1= first year
1-2= 2nd
2-3= 3rd
3-4= 4th
4-5= 5th
5-6= 6th
6-7= 7th
7-8= 8th
8-9= 9th
9-10= 10th
now= 11th
Did that make any sense?
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 08:20 PM
|
#5 of 85
|
|
Member
Location: Wylie, TX
Join Date: Dec 1998
Local Time: 04:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 2,185
|
No, we're in the 21st century. 1 to 100 was the first century. The second began with 101 ending in 200. So you go by the ending year. 1901 to 2000 would therefore be the 20th century. Does that clear it up?
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 09:38 PM
|
#6 of 85
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Local Time: 02:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 3,296
|
Just like 1582 only had 355 days, I would suggest that the 20th century only had 99 years. The third millenium, the 21st century, and the decade after the Nineties -- decades, centuries, and millenia should coincide, shouldn't they? -- all started on January 1, 2000. I remember the fireworks
I know this rankles some purists, and their argument is certainly logical. I'm just trying to give them a logical way to accept things as they are
Nick, in your paper you might mention this is a point of some contention.
//Ken
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 09:54 PM
|
#7 of 85
|
|
Bryan
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Local Time: 05:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 2,666
|
Quote:
|
decades, centuries, and millenia should coincide, shouldn't they? -- all started on January 1, 2000. I remember the fireworks
|
Just because someone calls a dog a duck doesn't make it a duck.
The 21st century did not start until January 1, 2001. There's no reason to pretend it didn't just to please the ignorant masses. That would be like us accepting Pan&Scan just because the mass of J6Ps prefer it over OAR. Wouldn't it just be easier to go along with J6P? Yeah, but we'd rather educate them as to what is correct.
I don't mean to sound bitchy, but changing facts like this just because it may be 'easier' really gets under my skin. 
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 10:21 PM
|
#8 of 85
|
|
Member
Location: The stars at night.....
Join Date: Jul 1999
Local Time: 04:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 5,718
|
Quote:
|
That would be like us accepting Pan&Scan...
|
All right Bryan! A home theater analogy!
Of course you're correct, but that "2" and all the zeros just made most peoples brains shut down.
I remember being on the streets of downtown Austin that night, amazed that tens of thousands of people knew the lyrics to, "The Road Goes On Forever." One year later ( the real new century and milleneum) did not draw a a fraction of the crowd.
|
|
|
11-18-2003, 02:13 AM
|
#9 of 85
|
|
Cees Alons
Administrator
Location: Amsterdam, Holland
Join Date: Aug 1997
Local Time: 11:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 18,182
|
Quote:
|
Just like 1582 only had 355 days
|
To put it more correctly: the period that "they" tagged the year as '1532' lasted for 355 days.
But the 1532nd year after the point in time they designated as the birth of Christ lasted exactly as many days (or seconds) as the 1531st and the 1533rd.
Oh, and why shouldn't people be allowed to make a lot of noise when the century is spelled with a 2 (more precise: a 20) for the first time? Has not necessarily anything to do with what century it is (since whenever), doesn't it?
Cees
|
|
|
11-18-2003, 03:42 AM
|
#10 of 85
|
|
Nick So
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Local Time: 01:09 AM
Local Date: 10-08-2008
Posts: 5,429
|
Oh, the paper isnt about time, i just had to describe a period of time, and i just gone blank as to what century we were in :p)
|
| |