View Single Post
Old 09-23-2004, 09:45 AM   #7 of 96
Lou Sytsma
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Local Time: 07:54 AM
Local Date: 12-05-2008
Posts: 4,949

Send a message via AIM to Lou Sytsma
Hmmm let's see

SFX:
not fair the LOTR movies have the advantage of more recent technology and the SW OT still stands up fine for me.

Story: SW - good guys vs bad guys
LOTR - good guys vs bad guys
It's a flavour thing - I prefer LOTR

Acting: No comparison LOTR by parsecs

Direction: See Acting

Dialogue: Not even in the same galaxy - LOTR

Score: toss up. SWs has a bold, brash, highly identifiable one, LOTR has a much more complex and layered one.

Intangibles: This is where SW picks up most of it's steam and it's has nostalgia on it's side as well. LOTR has the advantage of pedigree - being based on a classic book.

SW runs with a preteen sensibility. LOTR aims slightly higher.

SW ends with a weaker 3rd picture. LOTR starts strong, sags in the middle - just a bit, and finishes strong.

Final verdict: LOTR edges out SW as my favourite trilogy.

The Matrix is a nonissue for me because the sequels are far below the original.



Every man is my superior, in that I may learn from him.
Lou Sytsma is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket Reply With Quote sendpm.gif