View Single Post
Home Theater Forum
Old 02-19-2004, 03:58 PM   #3 of 12
John Garcia
Member
 
Location: San Jose, Ca.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Local Time: 02:25 AM
Local Date: 11-23-2008
Posts: 11,228

I always liked the Minis for the price, a fine speaker. I have to completely agree with your assessment of the 20s being brighter than the Minis. The highs on the 20s, with their Aluminum tweeter, are definitely approaching harsh to me with brighter material, and the upper midrange is more "in your face" - more detailed, but not entirely pleasing to me. I like the softer nature of the tweeter on the Monitors, but they do sound a tad muffled in the lower midrange (v2s, the v3s have improved a bit with the new drivers), especially when you compare them to studios in the same setup. I am a fan of soft dome tweeters and 'Digm doesn't do those anymore.

Given the choice between the two for mains, I would pick the 20s without question. For surrounds, Minis. Many people say the same thing about Minis vs Titans, that the difference is too small, but I had both for a long time, and I can tell you the difference is very noticable, and I'd say you will find the same is true over time with the Minis vs 20s.



"The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so." - Mark Twain

HT: Marantz SR-8300, MA500 monoblocks x 2, 5X GR Research A/V-2s, Adire Audio Tempest sub, Denon 2900, Oppo 980H, Toshiba HD-A2, RC2000MkII remote, Panamax 5100, Panamax Max2 sub, Slim PS2, PS3 60G + 320G USB

Bedroom: Marantz PM-7200 Integrated, GR Research A/V-1s, Sony 222ES SACD, RC3200 remote, Panamax M8EX

Audio: Audioquest * Video: Bluejeans


My DVDs My HT
John Garcia is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket Reply With Quote sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum