View Single Post
Home Theater Forum
Old 09-11-2003, 11:43 AM   #4 of 37
DaViD Boulet
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Local Time: 06:34 PM
Local Date: 10-12-2008
Posts: 9,550

Roogs,

I'm with Michael...we just gotta know

If you're not pulling our leg then that certainly would be the best apples-apples comparison possible if one wanted to compare compression-algorithm to compression-algorithm. I state that because it's very possible that *many* of the sound-quality issues listeners consistently hear between various "formats" like DTS or DD may have many factors that come into play in practice other than compression-algorithm.

Some questions do remain given what you describe: Were identical bit-rates used during compression? What was the resolution of the source PCM digital multitrack signal? Was that resolution preserved (I understand that DD can encode up to 20-bit words) or downconverted to the 16-bit level for either or both codecs? Were any additional processing steps employed or avoided? DD has a host of manipulation tools like dialog normalization and EQ etc. that often get used inadvertantly by mastering houses without much expertise.

Private Messaging enabled?



Be an Original Aspect Ratio Advocate

Supporter of 1080p24 video and lossless 24 bit audio.
DaViD Boulet is online now Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum