Roogs,
I'm with Michael...we just gotta know
If you're not pulling our leg

then that certainly would be the best apples-apples comparison possible if one wanted to compare compression-algorithm to compression-algorithm. I state that because it's very possible that *many* of the sound-quality issues listeners consistently hear between various "formats" like DTS or DD may have many factors that come into play in practice other than compression-algorithm.
Some questions do remain given what you describe: Were identical bit-rates used during compression? What was the resolution of the source PCM digital multitrack signal? Was that resolution preserved (I understand that DD can encode up to 20-bit words) or downconverted to the 16-bit level for either or both codecs? Were any additional processing steps employed or avoided? DD has a host of manipulation tools like dialog normalization and EQ etc. that often get used inadvertantly by mastering houses without much expertise.
Private Messaging enabled?
