View Single Post
Home Theater Forum
Old 04-25-2003, 01:30 PM   #2 of 8
Greg Monfort
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Local Time: 06:58 PM
Local Date: 01-07-2009
Posts: 1,112

Blending to planars/ribbons/horns all dictate a matching farfield acoustic sensitivity and ~flat phase/transient perfect response in the passband (this includes the XO's overlapping BW also), ergo you ideally need a bigger version of what you've already got and high order active L-R XOs. Once you move away from the ideal you have to decide where you're willing to compromise. Most folks who want to keep the mismatch to a minimum just ditch the phase response, limiting its match to the XO point (time aligned/phase aligned).

This leaves us with a wide BW Q = 0.5 sealed, or open baffle (dipole) with a true 1st order or 4th/8th active L-R XOs. In this BW, of these two, the open baffle/active is the better choice, but is larger/more expensive.

I prefer prosound drivers which I assume would be much bigger/more expensive than you're willing to tolerate so others will have to chime in with any potentially suitable consumer grade midbass drivers.

GM



Loud Is Beautiful, If It's Clean
Greg Monfort is offline Quote this post in a PM Send Support Ticket Reply With Quote sendpm.gif
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Forum