I think Brian's decision makes perfect sense. He is purchasing a 47" widescreen television that happens to also have a 53" screen for 4:3 material. I dont see how his 47" of widescreen real estate is any less optimized than a...
On circuit city's website it lists this model as having 2 rear standard component inputs. Most other models it lists as having 2 HD component inputs. Is there really a difference?
I am in the exact same boat as you...same budget, same criteria except I want to make sure it also does not lock into full screen mode when fed a progressive source. I am also considering the Sony 4:3 53" set because it would give a...
I believe alot of people remove them due to the glare they add from reflecting light from the room.....and to give them the most natural looking picture. I am not saying its better without it, just that its an option some people prefer...
I know the Panasonic Tau does it through auto detection, not a manual selection....but still does a good job displaying widescreen content. I am not sure if that is available in 27, or if 32" is the smallest.
Yeah, its frustrating because employees seem to lack even the basic training in these chain stores. They insist it has the squeeze mode, but because of their progressive feed they cant make most of them go to 16:9. The only one I...
I believe its the x52.....and has 4 speakers instead of 2. If you dont have the concern of a rogue little hand touching your screen, it is obviously better to go without the protector. I just dont have that luxury.
In my quest for the largest tv I could get for under 2 grand I have decided to get a 4:3 due to the fact I can get a much larger 4:3 picture and a comparable 16:9 for the same price as a widescreen using the squeeze mode. Here is the...
