Craig, we can of course speculate
ad nauseum but history shows that the current phenomenom of longform music programming (concert films and video compilations) being produced, financed and/or distributed by (an) entity/entities other than the record label to which the artist is signed (
e.g.,
Rush In Rio,
Tina Turner's Live In Amsterdam) is not the way these kinds of titles were produced and distributed in the past.
Yes, Image Entertainment used to be many studios' licensee for release of LD movie titles, but on the music side of the business, that's not typically the way it worked. It has been the rising strength of "independent" tour promotion companies like Clear Channel and the rise of corporate sponsorship of tours (an area in which Madonna was a, um, pioneer) that has facilitated a change in this regard.
Be all that as it may, regardless of how feasible it may seem
now, it is highly unlikely that, back
then at the time of the
Blond Ambition Tour, Warner would relinquish all rights to the video release of a major tour by one of the label's biggest artists.
Back when I had a bigger jones to figure out why so many Pioneer Artists music LDs had yet to show up on DVD, I sent Pio a letter (which I'll dig out of my chron file and revise the post with the names of some titles when I get home). I finally got a Pioneer contract administration staffer on the phone after vigorously following up on the letter. Pio's position was not that they just had LD rights, but rather all optical media disc rights. I'd bet you all the sand in the Mojave that that was
not Warner's position. Just because Pio sponsored Madonna's tour does not mean that they would own the video rights in all media, any more than Image being licensed to release feature films on LD by the studios does not mean that Image owns the rights to the film proper.
As diminished as Pio's stature has become in the DVD world compared to their prominence in the LD market back in the day, if they had clear chain of title to a title as big as
Blond Ambition, they would have released it by now. Speculative to be sure, but I surmise that there was a rights battle here that perhaps saw Warner threatening legal action if Pio released a
Blond Ambition DVD. Stranger things have happened in this business for Warner to then turn around and not release the title themselves for whatever
fakakta reason.
I think it has to do with the changes in the broader music business and the perception that longform music programming, what with its generally very short shelf life, is just not as viable now
as far as the labels are concerned. From Rush to Vince Gill, there are so many artists I had LDs for that have not seen the light of DVD.
-p