HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: Drag Me To Hell - Unrated Director's Cut
Normally horror or slasher films are not on my list to watch but I knew i would enjoy this one.
If it's a funny horror film I'm in and this one was really fun as well as scary.
The shot of an anvil and what happpens after it falls was a riot.
This was a great film and I liked it at 4 stars out of 5.
The audio seemed to be better later in the movie then in the beginning, until about 15-20 minutes in the sound sound seemed to me to be slightly low and even a little scratchy but once the stuff starts to happen it was much better.
Kevin, what do you think the sound needed to be better then 3.5 for you?
I debated giving the sound a higher rating, but wound up just settling where I was. It's simply a matter that the mix is of a kind with most other horror films I've reviewed here - run the low volume, build up the creepy music, empty out the atmosphere and then jab the audience with the cattle prod. It's effective and aggressive, but nothing that felt like I should go to another level with it.
I didn't notice the scratchiness, to be honest.
I agree with you that Raimi shows he knows exactly what he's doing here. If you're a Raimi fan, particularly of his earlier films, you'll have a blast here.
Did they keep the old 1970's and 80's Universal logo at the front of the movie for video? I can't imagine that they'd change it from the theaters but I figured I'd check. Call me anal.
The older Universal opening is on the header for the movie, and the "Visit Universal Studios" placard follows the end credits. Raimi has a great sense of humor.
I am Marti D. Humphrey CAS , the Re-Recording Mixer on "Drag Me To Hell".
I saw your review and noticed on your score of "The Audio" which you gave it a low score.
And then I read your reason above. I am shocked!
Especially when there are other reviews that give it all scores in the 90's or 4.5 stars.
Here is a link to some other reviews:
http://www.cinemasquid.com/blu-ray/movies/details/drag-me-to-hell?movieid=10630&locale=all
This mix was far from "ordinary". It was dynamic with every element given it's proper
balance within the timeline. While it would be nice to get 100's everytime I have trouble with
the reason for your score. Especially if it's on BluRay.
I look forward for your reply.
Marti D. Humphrey CAS
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0401937/
www.thedubstage.com
Go to "The Dub Stage" to see my "Theater"
nevermind, I know what happened now.
Yes, what did happen to my post? did i raise a question about the rating and it gets deleted ?
Marti D. Humphrey CAS
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0401937/
www.thedubstage.com
Go to "The Dub Stage" to see my "Theater"
Or it was another reason, I don't know.
Edited by TonyD - 10/11/09 at 3:36pm
Marti --
Your post was not deleted, nor would it be. When you hit "submit", you should have received a message indicating that, because you're a new member, the post was being held for moderation. This frequently happens with posts from new members that contain links, and it is an automated process.
As soon as I saw your post in the moderation queue, I cleared it. It now appears in its original position. Thanks for understanding.
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal) HTF Rules & Regs My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
It was only because of the post by TonyD asking what happened to "Marti's Post" did I ask.
Thank you for your reply.
Marti D. Humphrey CAS
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0401937/
www.thedubstage.com
Go to "The Dub Stage" to see my "Theater"
Thank you. Looking forward to some more discussion on the sound of "Drag me To Hell".
Take care,
Marti D. Humphrey CAS
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0401937/
www.thedubstage.com
Go to "The Dub Stage" to see my "Theater"
I just logged on to the site and found your response in this thread.
Sorry for not checking it earlier.
I'm sorry that my rating appears as low. I believe I said the mix was "effective and aggressive", of a kind with the film itself. As I said, I debated taking the rating up to a "4" but settled where I was. I didn't think I was giving you a low mark, or disrespecting your work. A low mark for me is "2" or lower. "3 1/2" is pretty darn good. When I get up into the "4" or "5" range, it's usually a different matter for me. I particularly keep that in mind for Blu-ray titles.
We had some discussion about this kind of thing about a year and a half ago here - specifically about watching out about giving out "Highly Recommended" on too many reviews. And I've been mindful of that ever since.
I hear what you're saying about the other reviews at other websites. I try not to base my ratings on other reviews, other than to make sure that I didn't miss something really obvious that everyone else has picked up on. (I've also learned to check the forums here, as there may be discussions already brewing about some titles before I can post the review.) By the same reasoning, I also don't necessarily dismiss an audio mix or a picture transfer just because another website or blogger has a problem. (I'm wary of the current practice of posting screengrabs as part of an attack on a DVD's PQ - since movies, well, MOVE...)
I'm glad to know a member of the show's crew has been able to see the review and can participate in this forum. My first exposure to the film was actually about a year ago, when I worked with one of the ADs. We kept trying to bring her in to help us but she kept telling us she was supposed to work on something called Drag Me To Hell. Which kept getting the response from us of "You're working on WHAT?"
That you for your response. However the point I am making is that you went into this review by saying
Marti D. Humphrey CAS
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0401937/
www.thedubstage.com
Go to "The Dub Stage" to see my "Theater"
In all honesty, I am not seeing the problem here. Your quote from my review includes my acknowledgment of the confidence of craft in this film. I noted this in my review in more than one place, and I noted it again in my response here.
I need to ask if you believe that I would need to be a horror film fan in order to provide a proper evaluation of this DVD. I honestly do not see that as an issue.
I noted the solid work done by your department, as well as everyone else involved in the production. I certainly didn't give the film or the Blu-ray a bad review. If I wasn't giving the Blu-ray an extremely enthusiastic review, that simply reflects my taste - not any reflection on the work on display. This does not mean that I can't be objective about the technical details - please be aware that I have gone through several horror genre films both on Blu-ray and standard definition in the time I have submitted reviews to HTF. The comments you see from me in my second quote reflect that the mix is similar to others of the same vein. That doesn't mean it's a bad mix - it means that this is exactly what you would expect and want from this genre.
I would be happy to hear any comments from the moderators here - if I have misspoke, I'd be happy to correct the situation.
Thanks for your participation and your feedback.
Many people think that an opinion different from their's is an incorrect opinion.
I'm not sure that's what is happening with Marti or not.
You or anyone shouldn't write a review based on what he thinks the people expect him to say.
Welcome to the forum. I understand that you are dissatisfied with the star rating, but we don't police our reviewers. The rating Kevin uses is entirely up to him. In Kevin's last post he addresses your concern about him being fairly able to grade the technical merits of the film despite the genre. I think you may be dwelling too much on the 3.5 stars and what that did to the score at Cinema Squid and not enough on the actual text of Kevin's review, where he is complimentary and speaks favorably of the mix.
Thanks again for contributing to the discussion on this title. While we are on the subject would you mind talking about the sound design on this film?
I will gladly answer any questions about the Sound Design of the Film.
But before I do Adam, have you listened to it carefully, I mean listened to it?
If you have then you will see why it deserves more than a 3.5 stars.
Especially since Kevin states
This is a Remarkable Mix and for Kevin to say
Any more slanted than that?
It just doesn't add up.
How about this Adam, why don't you and Michael watch it (together if possible) and let us here know your HONEST
ratings for the "Audio" part of the Movie.
After that I will be glad to answer your questions.
Thank You,
Marti D. Humphrey CAS
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0401937/
www.thedubstage.com
Go to "The Dub Stage" to see my "Theater"
I found the Blu-ray to have nearly reference audio and video, I also think Kevin's scores for both were a bit conservative. I watched on a 51" screen and saw nothing but a clean, solid, and stable image throughout. I would rate the video 4.5 stars at least, if not 5. Audio at 4.5.
P.S Tarantino has finally bested Pulp Fiction.
Edited by dpippel - 10/18/09 at 12:29pm
Careful man! There's a beverage here!
John Burton
best horror film I have seen for some years - actually frightening - and not sickening like much of the recent "torture porn" (Hostel, Saw, etc.)
Not to single you out (since I see it used all the time) but I hate the term "torture porn" because it's just a quick and easy BS way to dismiss a movie. I have no problem with someone disliking a movie because of explicit violence and gore but to call it "torture porn" is just a way to paint the movies as something terrible and tries to make the movies impossible for anyone to defend. Afterall, what kind of sicko would defend something that's been branded as "torture porn"?




